Another WSJ banger about why the poors aren't doing more

⁨1577⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨bytesonbike@discuss.online⁩ to ⁨aboringdystopia@lemmy.world⁩

https://discuss.online/pictrs/image/4616ae71-c5fb-48a1-8b12-88228e0b6fec.png

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
“In many ways, this age group is in a better place financially, on average, than their parents were at this age. The problem is that they don’t seem to know it.”

Yeah? What ways are those?

Is this one?

““Our expectations are so much higher today,” says Melissa Kearney, an economist at the University of Maryland whose research focuses on children and family. “Generations before us didn’t expect to have large houses where every kid had a bedroom and there were multiple vacations.””

We just shouldn’t expect to have mansions for our many many kids? Fuck you. I don’t have kids, am experienced in a well paying career and I can’t afford a house at all unless I go somewhere that I can’t five the kind of work I do in. That’s not even considering the lack of kids many of us have, because we can’t afford them.

Fuck this out of touch shit. I’m so sick of these people who already got theirs telling the people who can’t do the same that it’s their own fault. This fucking article goes further than that suggesting it’s worse than our daily because we’re better situated somehow.

Avocado toast ass argument. This country needs more guillotines.

source
- kibiz0r@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Yeah, they cherry-pick that average income is up vs previous generations, adjusted for inflation.
  
  Okay, but… cost of living has gone up. Not just for the things that existed 40 years ago, but also from the new things that are necessary for maintaining a career, like broadband internet and a smartphone.
  
  They had a guy in the article that owes 200k in student loans! This is not apples-to-apples.
  
  And also, so what if it’s up in average? Inequality is the worst it’s ever been. They barely sneak an asterisk in to address that, too.
  
  source
  - Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Average income isn’t even useful because the only salaries that have gone up are CEOs.
    
    source
  - merdaverse@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Average real income (adjusted for inflation) has been pretty steady in the last 50 years for the bottom 50% bracket. The higher up you go in the income bracket the higher the growth becomes. The real income of the top 0.01% has grown by 670% in that same time. So you can see where all that extra wealth generated from 2x productivity boost has gone. Trickle up economics.
    
    Source with nice graphs
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - ameancow@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    
    They had a guy in the article that owes 200k in student loans!
    
    Everything else can be argued when it comes to growth/wages, but by far the single most crippling issue we have in the US is massive debt to survive, and once you’re in debt, you often never get out.
    
    We had a term for this in the middle-ages.
    
    History repeats over and over.
    
    source
  - HubertManne@piefed.social ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    yeah average means we have mcmansions now. Let me know when modal is up compared to inflation. Or average of the second and third quartile (rich is where most of it is at but poorest its to easy for it to rise without effectively doing anything for them)
    
    source
- Scubus@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Your parents had one dollar, you have three. Much rich. Nevermind the fact that your parents one dollar was the down payment on a car and you cant afford a bowl of lettuce.
  
  source
  - Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I remember reading this in an Uncle Scrooge comic when I was a kid. For context, Uncle Scrooge was explaining how money works to his nephews. The gist was “it’s not how much money, but how much it will buy that counts”.
    
    I learned that lesson from a Scottish cartoon duck.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - waspentalive@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    They had $1.00, but the bread was 50 cents. The 30-somethings have $3.00, but bread is now $5.00, just saying how many slips of green paper a has compared to b is useless when those slips buy less and less.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Aaaaah nooooo they actually used the words “arrested development” which is the name of the show that this quote comes from:
  
  It’s one banana, Michael. What could it cost, $10?
  
  www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nl_Qyk9DSUw
  
  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrested_Development
  
  source
  - djdarren@piefed.social ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    These days that’s not far off the truth.
    
    source
- Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  It’s not out of touch, its deliberate gaslighting.
  
  source
  - blargle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    It would be gaslighting if the intended audience was the young people it was talking about. But they aren’t the ones reading the Wall Street Journal.
    
    It’s right-wing propaganda designed to confirm the existing biases of boomer haves (their real audience) toward gen-z have-nots (the smeared out-group)
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Are those smaller houses in the room with us?
  
  Lmao, like in 95% of the US people can’t build anything but single family houses.
  
  source
  - Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I don’t know about the entirety of the country, but I do know that around me, the only affordable homes being built or sold are for people 55 years and older. It’s like a slap in the face when you’re looking for somewhere to live and oh, whoops, you’re 20 years too young!
    
    Is the baby boomer generation even buying those places? My experience is only anecdotal, but I don’t know a single baby boomer who’s moved to a seniors-only community. It’s something my grandma did, but my parents? They’re moving to a state with a lower cost of living and getting a bigger house than the one I grew up in. 😑
    
    Meanwhile, my best chance of having an affordable apartment requires winning a low income housing lottery. Yes, a literal lottery. That’s what decides if I’ll be living in my car or not next year (or, dread of dreads, doing what my mom keeps telling me to do and uprooting my entire life to move to a southern state like she’s doing. I told her that if I have to move, I’d rather move out of the country. I also told her that I don’t want to live anywhere where I may be left to die if I end up with an ectopic pregnancy. She’s too detached from reality to understand.)
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- bcgm3@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Just more propaganda from the haves to the have-nots. Everything that sucks about your life is directly related to your personal lack of willpower, your unwillingness to hustle, your inability to see the ways the market moves and pivot in just the right way and at just the right moment. No, don’t look at your neighbors, stop noticing all the other crabs in the bucket, this is your shortcoming. This is because you suck. Work more hours, sacrifice more of your connection to nature and friends and family, stop asking questions. What is life if not servitude? What is existence if not submission? Stop thinking and start doing what you’re told. Don’t look up. Don’t you EVER look up.
  
  source
- merc@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  
  I can’t afford a house at all unless I go somewhere that I can’t find the kind of work I do
  
  I think this is a key point.
  
  The average house prices in major cities has gone up ridiculous amounts. But, if you look at the average national house prices it isn’t as dramatic. The problem is, that there are a lot of jobs that only exist in those expensive, major cities. It doesn’t much matter if a house in the suburbs of Detroit is dirt cheap if your job doesn’t exist anywhere near Detroit.
  
  So, you have places where the housing prices are reasonable, but nobody earns a really high wage because it isn’t one of the major metro areas in the country. Then you have places where the jobs exist but housing is completely out of reach.
  
  Also, it seems to me like the big issue is that while some goods have become cheaper and cheaper over the years, the ones that have become prohibitively expensive are the important ones. Like, look at Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Food price inflation and overall price inflation have been about the same since the 80s, but since 2020 that’s not true. Since then food has become much more expensive relative to the inflating dollar. Then there’s housing (a.k.a. “shelter”) that has been outpacing inflation by a massive amount since Reagan’s time, but even worse since 2020. The only thing that has become cheaper in at the bottom of Maslow’s pyramid is clothing. But, the kind of clothing that’s cheap is “fast fashion”. It’s not basic “shelter” type clothing. Maybe that has become cheaper, but enough clothing to survive was never a major expense.
  
  The next tier up in Maslow’s hierarchy is safety needs: personal security, health and wellbeing, financial security, safety nets. This is probably the area that has been hit the hardest. Because of America’s messed up healthcare system healthcare costs are getting more and more expensive. Financial security is also a joke for most non-boomers. The US has no safety net to speak of. And personal security, in the era of Trump, I think a lot of people feel much less secure.
  
  There are things that are part of the consumer price calculation that have been getting cheaper. But, if you can’t meet your basic needs, that really doesn’t matter. Sure, my grandpa would have been absolutely amazed with the entertainment I can get on a screen. Compared to a black and white TV a modern TV is incredibly cheap, amazingly high quality, the selection of things to watch is astounding, etc. But gramps had a steady job, a guaranteed pension, reasonable medical costs, a house that could be bought for a couple of years of salary, etc.
  
  source
  - IronBird@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    remove all speculation incentives from housing, fuck remove all speculation incentives full-stop, and maybe all these rich cunts will actually do something with their $ (like build homes) instead of jerk themselves off while watching lines go up.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Well said. I would add to the healthcare point that the system for providing insurance through an employer is a way to tether people to a job without having to offer benefits like pensions. Why would a company need to entice a person to stay with a strong benefits package that includes the possibility of being able to retire of they can be either crippled with medical debt, chained to a job to reduce the chance of being crippled by medical debt, or both?
    
    I am under no illusion that things were utopian for previous generations, but the idea that things are better for people broadly, and not worse in insidious ways through continual assaults on working conditions, workers rights, and ability to generate net worth is… frustrating.
    
    source
- FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  I just want to explain that the author did say that. This was a quote from a University of Maryland professor. The very next paragraph of the article starts with:
  
  "To be sure, financial averages are just that. A sizable share of this generation is worse-off than their parents were. Young men in particular are struggling in the labor market. And some of the traditional goals of adulthood really have become more difficult to achieve. "
  
  source
  - Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I have a burning hatred for this article, and you get to be the recipient of my rant about it, but I don’t mean any of this as an attack on you. I don’t think it will read that way, but I want to say it ahead of time, because I am inspired to do a much more full analysis of why this article, and its author, are bullshit.
    
    I do not think it’s accurate to say the author is not arguing that this generation is at fault. The quotes that were chosen, the data that was emphasized, and the piece’s structures all point toward a kind of “soft-blame” thesis. That thesis being that thirty-somethings could have reached traditional milestones but didn’t, mostly because of their own choices and/or unrealistic expectations. The author never seriously pushes back on that implication.
    
    Let’s look at what she actually includes and what she doesn’t challenge. Here are some examples of implied agency (“it’s their choice”):
    
    1. Choosing high-cost cities despite better options.
    
    “He’s paying $1,700 in monthly rent to live with roommates in Brooklyn.”
    
    “When it became clear his dreams of homeownership were not achievable in New York, he recently got help from his parents to close on a fixer-upper in his hometown of Easton, Pa.”
    
    “She knows her salary would go farther in her hometown of Philadelphia, but she prefers to stay in L.A.”
    
    These aren’t framed as traps. They’re framed as conscious choices. The author could have emphasized the structural necessity of clustering near job opportunities or family networks, but she doesn’t. Instead, she highlights that both subjects prefer expensive metros, implying that their cost-of-living struggles are at least partly self-inflicted. It also implies they could move to lower cost of living areas and not suffer a wage decrease as well - it’s not so straightforward as is strongly implied.
    
    2. Refusing to downsize or cut luxuries.
    
    “Inflation has raised the price of small luxuries, such as her Spotify subscription, but she doesn’t want to give them up.”
    
    The “small luxuries” quote feels deliberately included to make readers think, so you can afford Spotify but not a mortgage? Avocado toast. The author does not counter that framing by mentioning that skipping a subscription will do next to nothing to make home ownership feasible; she leaves the quote to speak for itself, which effectively endorses the idea that younger adults’ priorities are the real issue.
    
    3. Idealistic standards in relationships.
    
    “He’d also rather stay single than compromise on the wrong fit.”
    
    Again, the author does not provide commentary pushing back on this. There’s no line like, “This desire for compatibility reflects how the marriage market itself has changed.” Instead, she lets the reader infer that they’re single because they’re picky.
    
    4. Framing “freedom from old pressures” as the problem.
    
    “Growing up with less pressure to follow the same narrow route to adulthood… has raised the bar for what these milestones look like.”
    
    This line subtly redefines the freedom to choose different life paths as the reason people are stuck. It is not framed as an adaptation to changing circumstances, but rather as an indulgence that prevents commitment. It comes across as an inversion of sympathy: what sounds like neutral observation actually functions as a subtle criticism.
    
    5. Self-focus over family formation.
    
    “Motherhood, she says, is a ‘nonstarter.’ ‘Kids become the first priority,’ says Fuller. ‘I’m still figuring myself out as a priority.’”
    
    There’s no attempt to contextualize Fuller’s choice within the structural realities that make parenthood materially and logistically prohibitive. No weight given to things like the extreme cost of childcare, stagnant wages relative to housing, inadequate parental leave, limited healthcare coverage, and the lack of systemic support for working families. The author’s choice to close the entire article on this quote gives it enormous rhetorical weight. The final word is that adulthood is being deferred because people are self-absorbed or uncertain, not because society made parenthood impossible. Remember the power given to the final word here, because I’m going to do it too - partially as an example supporting this point.
    
    What you pointed out were the author’s attempts to hedge around that main argument, and here’s why I find those hedges disingenuous. While the author does acknowledge economic hardship a few times, those moments feel more like token gestures than genuine balance. The references are brief, mostly numerical, and each one is immediately undercut by a counterpoint that shifts attention back to personal attitudes and choices.
    
    1. “The conventional explanation… is that they can’t afford to grow up… Yet this doesn’t quite explain what’s going on.”
    
    This sentence dismisses affordability as the dominant factor before showing any serious data that it might be. It sets up the rest of the article to downplay structural forces.
    
    2. “It’s true that 30-somethings have had a run of tough economic luck… But the numbers paint a more complicated picture.”
    
    That “but” flips sympathy into skepticism. The article follows that turn by citing Labor Department data claiming that median wages for full-time workers ages 35–44 have risen 16% since 2000 (from about $58,500 to $67,600, adjusted for inflation) and Federal Reserve data showing a 66% rise in wealth for 30-somethings between 1989 and 2022 (from roughly $62,000 to $103,000). Those figures are plausible but not clearly sourced, and they rely on broad aggregates rather than detailed, verifiable cohort data. More importantly, the article treats these averages as evidence of improved financial footing without accounting for inflation in housing, childcare, healthcare, tuition, debt, transportation, or general cost of living which are the real choke points for this generation. In that context, the interpretation is under-contextualized at best and misleading at worst: aggregate gains say little about actual affordability or distributional reality.
    
    3. “To be sure, financial averages are just that.”
    
    That’s a classic hedge. It is a single sentence acknowledging inequality, that is immediately followed by more emphasis on choice and mindset. It exists to claim objectivity but doesn’t alter the argument or really acknowledge factors that do not support the thesis I suggested above.
    
    4. “A sizable share of this generation is worse-off than their parents were.”
    
    True, but she immediately pivots back to “still, growing up with less pressure…” This concession is rhetorical cover. It gives the appearance of balance while keeping the causal blame with the subjects’ attitudes.
    
    The reason that all feels so disingenuous to me is that the issue isn’t just what the author says, but how the piece is built. Every quote chosen blames individuals (high expectations, luxuries, refusal to compromise) and is left unchallenged. She gives experts who blame attitude (Reeves, Kearney) far more space than anyone who would highlight structural barriers. When she finally acknowledges real problems she calls them “complicated,” softens them with “averages,” then shifts back to “expectations.”
    
    If she truly disagreed with the “it’s their fault” narrative, she could have included economists who emphasize wage stagnation relative to cost of living, systemic childcare shortages, or the collapse of affordable housing. She didn’t. That omission is itself an argument. So yes, technically the article hedges against my initial read of it, but I think it is fair to suggest that those hedges are thin disclaimers attached to a piece that, in practice, amplifies the exact worldview it pretends to interrogate:
    
    “Young people say they can’t afford to grow up, but actually they can; they’re just pickier, more self-focused, and less willing to sacrifice.”
    
    That’s the message readers are left with, because that’s where the author ends the story and anchors every example. The quotes weren’t balanced. They were curated to support a moral narrative of generational fault, and they are never truly refuted, which is functionally the same as agreeing with them.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- Witchfire@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  My partner and I thrive in a two bedroom. One room for sleep, and one studio/guest room (we’re both artists). Apparently that’s too much to ask.
  
  source
- HubertManne@piefed.social ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  house with every kid having a bedroom? Having anything. The smallest condo without the constant fear of losing it is all I see anyone “expecting” Don’t get me wrong I complain how my janitor father could afford what is nowadays a dilapidated mansion and is completely unachievable but I don’t expect to be able to get that. I mean. I very much would like to.
  
  source
- Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  It sure does.
  
  source
- AlexLost@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  You have access to more things, but less means to actually access them. These people are way out of touch. Heck, most of them think illegal immigrants actually get a free ride while they have e to pay for everything. Can you be more obtuse?
  
  source
- kureta@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  we are rich but we don’t know it. we’ll that’s… rich.
  
  source
atro_city@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
How are so many people still on Xitter?

source
- the_q@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  The same way people are still on heroin.
  
  source
  - atro_city@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Xitter is addictive?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  People are fine with nazis as long as it benefits them or they don’t have to change.
  
  source
- bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Dude its terrible. I tell my friends they need to get off and theyre like " but why doh? Me like it. " Ugh.
  
  source
- simplejack@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  A chunk of people still use it to provide a counter narrative to the right wing propagandists. Kind of like when Buttigieg or Newsom go on Fox News.
  
  source
  - atro_city@fedia.io ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Do we though? It's on a platform owned by an autistic fascist, racist, and supremacist.
    
    source
- SatyrSack@quokk.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  God dammit, Sarah
  
  source
- FridaySteve@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Especially when the entire experience can be recreated in any rudimentary AI chatbot. It’s not like there are any human users left on Twitter anyway.
  
  source
etherphon@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Most of us just realized long ago the game is fucking rigged so what’s the fuckin point.

source
- Kolanaki@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Been saying all this shit since 6th or 7th (stupid meme not intended) grade when I saw the writing on the wall. It’s fucking annoying that only since the COVID lockdowns does it appear anyone else started seeing it, too.
  
  source
  - HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I mean, I’m not going to turn away allies just because they woke up later. I might be a little suspicious, but allies are allies.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Covid showed many people it didn’t have to be this way. The ppp loans that were appropriately used to pay staff that had to quarantine. (Lots of them were abused.) The extended unemployment benefits, some states expanded Medicaid, the roll out of work from home on a vast scale. I feel you though. I’m 45, and as a 20 year old it was clear the system was rigged.
    
    source
  - explodicle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Most people don’t care until it impacts them personally. I don’t love it, but it’s just how people work. I hate that the accelerationists may have been right.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- passwordforgetter@lemmy.nz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  I think I figured out I was never going to make it back in 2015 - 2017. When I was in my mid twenties. I rented shitty shared flats with tenants I didn’t like (one even stole property from me) and I also lived in a crack den, a place they sent people to, after they served their prison sentence. Meth and whores from time to time. Lots of passive-aggressive crap in the TV room that tenants obviously learned from prison. I heard that in prison people fight over what to watch on TV, so people were anal about rules in that crack den. They lived like they were still locked up.
  
  source
dellish@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
In Capitalist America, milestones bypass you!

source
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Have you thought about buying a house instead of an avocado???

source
- jj4211@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Hey, they aren’t so tone deaf as to think avocado toast is all that stands between this generation and home ownership.
  
  It’s actually starbucks coffee: fortune.com/…/corcoran-group-ceo-says-just-as-tou…
  
  source
  - Buddahriffic@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    And if they stopped, some shitty writer will write an article whining about gen evil killing the hot served coffee industry.
    
    source
  - IndustryStandard@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    That is based and factual. Everyone needs to boycott Starbucks.
    
    source
fartographer@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
I didn’t skip my loan payment, I bypassed it. You’ve made me bypass numerous meals over the years.

source
- ininewcrow@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Or better yet … more and more people will start to realize that it’s cheaper in the long run to just skip your loan payments. Even if you lose everything, how much more can you lose?
  
  And when enough people lose, the banks and corporations start losing as well. So it’s in the best interest of the banks to keep everyone afloat as long as possible to keep up the illusion that the system is still working.
  
  It’s a precarious balance between making people believe that they need to stay in the game and stopping them from thinking that the game is rigged.
  
  source
  - hateisreality@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    They’re going to make debtor prison a thing, put people to work to pay it off at prison wages.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - Korhaka@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Only debt I have is a mortgage and I don’t like having that either but there isn’t really a better choice. Landlords are scum so at least I don’t deal with them anymore.
    
    source
ghosthacked@lemmy.wtf ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Imagine renting or getting a mortgage in this shitty society with no job security.

source
- ameancow@lemmy.world ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  I’ve been laid off four times in my adult life.
  
  I had a mortgage, I couldn’t keep it. See above.
  
  source
  - LadyButterfly@reddthat.com ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Fucking hell that’s rough
    
    source
- xorollo@leminal.space ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Imagine?
  
  source
UnculturedSwine@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Whoa, I feel like I jumped back in time 10 years when these corporate meat-riders were blaming us for their beer businesses failing while simultaneously telling us the reason we’re struggling is that we’re being irresponsible with our money. The “arrested development” is the USA’s disillusionment with capitalism.

source
- ieGod@lemmy.zip ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  I think lack of accountability is a common trait among americans in general though. Everything is someone else’s fault. The individual is sacrosanct. They can do no wrong.
  
  source
- Rekorse@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Everyone’s a future billionaire here, seemingly. “Fuck you get money”, should be the official motto.
  
  source
aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
lol. buying a house? having kids? I can barely afford to EAT, let alone bring another person into the world.

source
- 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  And yet both legacy and new media unironically tells you to pull yourself up by your own bootstraps
  
  source
  - aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    like the rich dude who said he could make $1M in one year, from homelessness. He cheated, and he still only made $60K
    
    source
- BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Many couples are putting off marriage because they both have student loans, and they don’t want to make their credit even worse.
  
  Worse, one might have loans, but not the other. Would you want to marry someone knowing you have to take on $100K in debt?
  
  source
Cargon@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
The WSJ is a right wing rag, unfit for toilet paper. No one should be surprised they publish half wit musings.

source
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
And anyone with the potential for a future, destroyed it all as soon as they became an adult by taking on a mountain of student loan debt, only to be told that the career they paid a fortune for is being largely replaced by AI.

source
stickly@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Pretty funny that the article and the reply both implicitly assume adulthood is owning things or doing certain activities. Adulthood is being able to navigate life through adversity. Every young person I know treading water with unstable income and no support is way more ‘grown up’ than boomers complaining about having to cut back on retirement cruises.

source
Reality_Suit@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
The answer is so easy:: make doing things affordable, and people will do things… anything, it doesn’t matter. Do you want people to have kids? Make having kids affordable. This is unregulated capitalists’ fault. Plain and simple.

source
- shalafi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Bingo. I think capitalism’s just dandy, but no economic system is going to work for the people if the governmental system refuses guardrails. At this point America isn’t merely declining to put rail in, we’re removing the few we had.
  
  For the capitalism haters, capitalism is not what your are experiencing. You are experiencing oligarchy.
  
  source
  - kibiz0r@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    It is capitalism we’re experiencing, but it’s treating capitalism as the only tool in the toolbox and structuring an entire culture around it.
    
    Markets work great for some things. Not everything. Currency works great for some things. Not everything.
    
    Anonymous transferrable shares of ownership, and all of the abstract financial instruments that spin out of that one simple mechanism… are honestly not very good for many things at all, but they’ve become the primary assets that our economy optimizes for.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
deathbird@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
The milestones have become outcroppings on a sheer rock face. Gripping like hell to one while searching for the next one. Stretching, grasping, searching, missing.

No rope.

source
- pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Oh I’m gonna involve a rope
  
  source
  - Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Use the guillotine
    
    source
givesomefucks@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
It’s actually a good article that gets into all that…

www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/…/ar-AA1wMMaJ

The fact that someone dumb enough to still be on Twitter only reads headlines shouldn’t surprise anyone.

source
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
The only growing emotionally that needs to happen is for the American people to grow some class consciousness.

source
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
A murdoch tabloid says as much.

source
Formfiller@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
It’s because we’re all accepting this unfair system even though the social contract has been broken. The first step is to stop accepting this system.

source
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
This image popped into my mind upon reading the headline; I hope my meaning comes across:

gentlemen

source
Boozilla@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
WSJ motto: always be punching down.

source
heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Speaking of never being an adult, what about addressing the nazi trolls in politics?

source
Boozilla@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Let me guess: the article doesn’t mention how the CEO-to-worker pay ratio has grown like cancer over the years.

source
Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Sounds like a shitty gaslight attempt

source
bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
I just enjoy doing fun things and enjoying life so ill never grow up. I’ll be playing video games, playing music, and breaking rc cars when im 90.

Still enjoy cartoons too. I guess I really had no siblings growing up so I like to entertain myself. Why do people get old and boring? Never understood it myself. Get old, not boring.

source
the_q@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Like it’s been a choice whether to grow up or not.

source
thax@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Here’s a link to the article: archive.ph/oM5UV

I don’t take issue with any of the points presented. As one from the Oregon-Trail generation, I fit the profile, but I’ve largely opted out of chasing milestones. To me, it always seemed rather tone deaf. You see, I grew up in a pseudo-religious household, one that replaced “god” with “family” but pushed similar ideals and wore similar horse blinders. As such, I set out to learn about the world. By college age, I came to see that, well, it appears that we are rather fucked. If the Earth is in a state of overshoot, then it’s only a matter of time before the wheels fall off. And, with each new data point, it’s looked increasingly like a number of the effects would come to fruition in my lifetime. I’m not anti-natalist, but I’ve not been confident that I could create a life for children that protects them. I do want the human race to survive, and I’ll strive to help my community in the ways that I can, but I’m not one to don earmuffs and make low probability decisions. “Don’t look up” is not an option for me, as I’ve been looking throughout my life.

We are experiencing the effects of overshoot, so it’s reasonable, in my opinion, to opt out and live in full awareness. Yes that spells the end of human systems as they currently exist, but that’s how it goes. We’ve fucked around, and now we shall find out.

source
iAvicenna@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Are we having a deep dive into Elon and Trump’s life?

source
hateisreality@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
I think they feel the AI and Planitr (I don’t care if I’ve got the spelling wrong) with ICE will keep people in line

source
kureta@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Which economists warn? What do they warning about? I’m really getting tired of this.

source
PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Boomer Trumper father is about to find out how he fucked himself by backing a felon after he lost his directorship job at 70 years old. No one is going to hire him now. And he is not ready for retirement. By miles.

source

-> View More Comments