I was thinking about those outfits celebrities wear that mess with flash photography equipment, and I was watching a dude on TV just now whose shirt pattern was going apeshit because of the camera, and I wondered if there could ever be a pattern or material that, when filmed, caused the camera irreversible damage. And if that were physically possible, I wondered if intentionally showing up to camera-heavy events wearing said shirt would constitute a crime on my part.
It’s just a shirt after all. It’s not like I’m grabbing a camera and smashing it on the ground. But at the same time, I know it will have that effect, so I’m accountable. But it’s not like my shirt is emitting damaging laser beams or anything, it’s entirely passive.
Also, is there anything like this scenario in real life/law?
phonics@lemmy.world 1 month ago
if you invent some passive way to damage tech by just being in its vicinity. not only would it be illegal. it would be a super weapon.
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 1 month ago
A weapon to surpass metal gear?
MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Snake?!
Snaaaaaake!!!
neidu3@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Å weapon to defeat metal gear
CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 1 month ago
How they gonna find out? No cameras to witness it
phonics@lemmy.world 1 month ago
eyes
hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 1 month ago
bro’s got the level 9 EMP aura