dev_null

Same here, and currently Let’s Encrypt is a central point of failure for my stuff. I don’t use any Cloudflare services, so adding it as a fallback for Let’s Encrypt seems like a good option to have.

Ohh, looks nice too. The more the merrier I guess.

How is that worse than now? Right now Let’s Encrypt is a single point of failure, if I can setup my certs to go Let’s Encrypt and then if Let’s Encrypt is down go to Cloudflare, then surely that’s better than not getting a cert at all when Let’s Encrypt is down.

It’s more redundancy. Am I missing something?

I’m not taking away your right to scrutinize it any way you want, I’m just offering a simpler explanation that you are free to disagree with. While I can disagree with his opinion, I don’t believe it’s anything but his actual opinion, as he has historically always held on to his technical opinions even when they burned bridges and were unpopular.

And yet he publicly speaks against and attacks these companies all the time. But just this once he isn’t?

Or, maybe, it’s just his genuine opinion?