SchmidtGenetics
@SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
- Comment on [deleted] 2 days ago:
So you need to pay to unlock the full potential of the vehicle?
- Comment on [deleted] 2 days ago:
Lol, too cheap to provide the right tires, so let’s make a cartel agreement to hobble our vehicles. Yeesh.
Thats worse than the American reasoning.
So I just want to point out, that’s it’s not unusual for people to convert while discussing. 250 is very close to the metric equivalent (it’s rounded to it for this reason) of 160 miles. Which conversely is also double the sped limit of most states, which is what governers are usually mandated at.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 days ago:
That’s an American law, so vehicles weren’t faster than police vehicles, there was ways to remove the governor though.
- Comment on Chinese SSD Manufacturer UNIS Flash Memory Unveils World’s Fastest PCIe Gen5 SSDs, Featuring Speeds of Up To 14,900 MB/s 6 days ago:
So computer illiterate don’t think it’s a smaller number
- Comment on Chinese EV maker BYD says new fast-charging system could be as quick as filling up a tank 2 weeks ago:
… where do you think the battery’s would be stored and charged…? Either on a structure above ground, so drive up on it, or underground and it would already be excavated…
- Comment on Chinese EV maker BYD says new fast-charging system could be as quick as filling up a tank 2 weeks ago:
You are*
…….
- Comment on Chinese EV maker BYD says new fast-charging system could be as quick as filling up a tank 2 weeks ago:
They don’t because no one would pay double the price for a worse vehicle dude….
People are free to import and buy them, what don you think is stopping them…?
- Comment on Multiple Tesla vehicles were set on fire in Las Vegas and Kansas City 2 weeks ago:
What…? Lots of vehicles are sold online without dealerships, where’s this an actual rule?
- Comment on Chinese EV maker BYD says new fast-charging system could be as quick as filling up a tank 2 weeks ago:
Okay, and factually their labor and parts are cheap. Your own source even says that this a major factor.
And you do realize every country subsidizes auto makers yeah? How much did the USA and EU countries do in same time frame…?
- Comment on Chinese EV maker BYD says new fast-charging system could be as quick as filling up a tank 2 weeks ago:
Read your own source maybe?
For its part, China has declared the EU subsidy probe a protectionist maneuver by Europe, saying that its automakers are winning because they make better products. Of course, even the study’s author say that the rapid adoption of green tech in Europe in particular is due in large part to cheap goods coming from China.
- Comment on Chinese EV maker BYD says new fast-charging system could be as quick as filling up a tank 2 weeks ago:
They can drop the battery out from underneath….
It’s not like you are gonna man handle the battery yourself in and out of these dude.
- Comment on Chinese EV maker BYD says new fast-charging system could be as quick as filling up a tank 2 weeks ago:
They aren’t manipulating, shits just cheaper to make over there. So they can make more profit and still charge less.
- Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages 5 weeks ago:
These same discussion happened with photoshop and “brush tools” why are those acceptable to make it less labor intensive, but this isn’t?
- Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages 5 weeks ago:
What have you debunked?
The same “repeating” can be said to you, and is probably why you’re projecting more fallacies onto me.
Ant “debunking” you’ve done, is to justify your bias that certain tools to replace humans are okay. And that’s obviously a hypocrital take, so what’s your real issue here? Just like anyone else, the term “ai” is just a trigger and you don’t like it? It to have it poured to your already “acceptable” tools make you go “REE”?
These same conversations were had with luddites like you when spellcheck came out, than PS, than grammarly. And guess what? They’re acceptable in everyday use.
The same will happen with AI as people treat more like a tool than a toy. Than jackasses like you will be left behind again, but then try and justify it like you are beee when the next one comes out.
Hypocritical Luddites like you are just the worst kind of fucking people.
- Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages 5 weeks ago:
Says the hypocrite that says one tool that replaces humans is okay, but not another.
Okay buddy, just because you can’t make a coherent argument or come up with a legitimate reason why one’s acceptable doesn’t make me slow. If anything just shows how flawed and fucked your reasoning is.
People have always used tools to replace humans. So this decry NOW over ai is what’s bullshit. They shouldn’t enable to use PS brush tools either. Same process, same outcome, the ai can actually be able to do more and remove labor. But now “that’s” not okay. This is what me and other users are pointing out.
But your “ai bad” bias, has made you ignorant to any actual discussions.
- Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages 5 weeks ago:
You seem to be missing the point that’s been made here since your ignorance is “ai bad”.
A tools a tool, any tool can be abused. So it’s a very hypocrital view to say these tools are acceptable, but make up arbitrary reasons why those ones aren’t. That’s what’s being done here, and why people are trying to shift the conversation focus to the “tool itself”.
Since even photoshop, grammarly, or any other non-ai tool is labour a usable too.
If we want humans doing stuff, why is a brushing tool acceptable? It’s not a human doing the work. So yeah the views here are extremely hypocritical.
- Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages 5 weeks ago:
Ah, so this kind of tool is allowable, but not another? Pretty hypocritical thinking there.
A tools is a tool, any tool can be abused.
- Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages 5 weeks ago:
Ah, so this kind of tool is allowable, but not another? Pretty hypocritical thinking there.
A tools is a tool, any tool can be abused.
- Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages 5 weeks ago:
Why do you think grammarly is a thing dude…?
People ALREADY use an llm for spellcheck, and it’s acceptable, yet this crosses a line…?
It’s always funny what people will find acceptable, but also balk at when it’s fundamentally the exact same thing.
Of these devs want to claim “no ai” and everything is human, than they can’t rely on spellcheck either. Both are automated tools no?
- Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages 5 weeks ago:
A tool is a tool dude. Why are you trying to justify one over the other?
- Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages 5 weeks ago:
What do you think grammarly is dude?
- Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages 5 weeks ago:
Then you better give up spellcheck and autocorrect.
- Comment on A crate for puppy 5 weeks ago:
You live in one yourself, they get one away from you.
- Comment on Meta claims torrenting pirated books isn’t illegal without proof of seeding 1 month ago:
In Canada it’s legal to download and watch content for personal use, so it’s when it’s shared that it becomes an issue.
Just like you could record anything with a vcr, you just couldn’t share it with your friends.
- Comment on Countries across the world use more land for golf courses than wind or solar energy. 1 month ago:
Can leave it as a public park instead of a private endeavor that the public can’t access.
- Comment on I miss when you could get a flagship phone that could fit in your hand 1 month ago:
??? Multiple people have told you the same thing……
Sounds like you don’t want to admit that you fucked up.
It sounds a lot like you’re the one who is ignoring definitions to bitch and moan 👋
Well sounds is a lot different than being factually incorrect and obtuse like you….
- Comment on I miss when you could get a flagship phone that could fit in your hand 1 month ago:
Phones in general are bigger, in each of those examples, smaller models also exist.
So how does that support your point? Lmfao.
- Comment on I miss when you could get a flagship phone that could fit in your hand 1 month ago:
??? Plenty of people are pointing the same thing out
It’s just you swinging this dude, and I’ve provided proof that you’re wrong, you’ve cherry picked a single definition and I provided multiple separate sources. As well had to explain how the minimalists phone still wouldn’t by definition ever be the “flagship” of its small and has no features.
- Comment on I miss when you could get a flagship phone that could fit in your hand 1 month ago:
As I explained previously, you’re cherry picking definitions to support your point.
Multiple other definitions that I provided you contradict that, and saying the same thing doesn’t suddenly make it true.
- Comment on I miss when you could get a flagship phone that could fit in your hand 1 month ago:
They used to make small flagships.
When, you keep saying that, but flagships have always been large and fancy. Can you provide an example? Because what it seems from every explanation you’ve made in this thread, you just don’t know what the term flagship means…
Sounds like you just need to learn words properly, the only one wrong here is you using an established term incorrectly and are conflating a small phone as a “flagship” which has NEVER been the case. Please provide an example of a flagship being small and compact, I would love to see how you came to fuck this well established term up so horrendously.