Zwuzelmaus

@Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Testing vs Prod⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩:

  No testing environment in my home lab so far.

  But on the other hand, no planned builds either. Just fiddling around til it works.

  I am currently planning for new hardware, and then doing it all with build scripts there, as fully automated as possible. The whole setup, from scratch. But for that I need to do some learning first.

  So the new hardware is going to be it’s own test environment for a good while, until it turns into production.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Sell your photocamera. Quick.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨“It Wouldn’t Be Surprising If, in Two Years’ Time, There Was a Film Made Completely Through AI”: Says Hayao Miyazaki’s Own Son⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  There are still some films worth looking.

  But will there be any then?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨An AI avatar tried to argue a case before a New York court. The judges weren't having it.⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  say universally the same avitar is applied to everyone while on trial.

  The one and only “good” AI. Trustworthy for everybody?

  I do not believe in that.

  First you would need to decide on the one and only company to provide that AI. Then someone must prove that it is good and only good. Then it must be unhackable (and remain so while technology evolves).

  All of this is hardly feasable.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨An AI avatar tried to argue a case before a New York court. The judges weren't having it.⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  the only thing that’s attempted to be bypassed, are biases related to his appearence and speech.IMO this concept could be the real future of trials if done right.

  How do you know if it is done right or wrong?

  It is fake, and it is a manipulative kind of fake.

  You assume some honorable purpose, but that isn’t the only possible purpose.

  Even “bypassing biases” would be a kind of manipulation, and you can never know what other manipulation is going on at the same time. It could exploit other biases. It could try other tricks that we are not evil enough to imagine, and it would be “better” at it than any real human.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Does a tiny motion tracking mouse thing exist at all?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  With your Bluetooth you might get to a precision of a centimeter or a few millimeters.

  But the computer mouse wants a precision of 1/100 of a millimeter. That’s why it has that optical sensor.

  I don’t think you’d have any fun that way.