Successful_Try543
@Successful_Try543@feddit.org
- Comment on Roman propaganda is crazy! 4 weeks ago:
Promiscuity of women was a big no-no for Romans.
- Comment on The act was significant for giving women the vote for the first time. But that’s not all it did 4 weeks ago:
You should probably mention that it’s about the UK.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representation_of_the_People_Act_1918
- Comment on You get a Pope! And you get a Pope! 5 weeks ago:
To add some context to the comment of @RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip :
- Comment on My favorite aspect of politics in the Holy Roman Empire and the Early Modern Period as a whole is just how pedantic it all was 5 weeks ago:
For those wondering: King of Prussia would imply that the monarch would claim power over enire Prussia, i.e. not just the part belonging to their Duchy, but also Polish Prussia belonging to the Crown of the Kingdom of Poland. Thus, Frederick I chose the title King in Prussia when promoting his duchy to a kingdom
After the first division of Poland and acquisition of Polish Prussia (Western Prussia) in 1772, Frederick II titled himself King of Prussia.
- Comment on Two queens, two very different Tudor marriages 5 weeks ago:
- Elizabeth oy York, daughter of Edward IV, married Henry Tudor (Henry VII).
Catherine of Aragon, mother of Mary I, was married to Henry VIII from 1509 until the annulment in 1533.
- Elizabeth oy York, daughter of Edward IV, married Henry Tudor (Henry VII).
- Comment on She's beautiful 1 month ago:
Somebody obviously likes big and wide empires
- Comment on Switzerland’s solar railway has been a success. What happens next? 2 months ago:
