Woman want another child is called productive.
Man want their nut to be kicked again is called masochist.
Where’s the equality in that? Finding pleasure in pain shouldn’t be shunned, get your nut kicked today!
Submitted 2 days ago by Uri@infosec.pub to [deleted]
https://infosec.pub/pictrs/image/5f01f6f1-2b9c-4052-a6ff-c702ceff12ac.jpeg
Woman want another child is called productive.
Man want their nut to be kicked again is called masochist.
Where’s the equality in that? Finding pleasure in pain shouldn’t be shunned, get your nut kicked today!
That’s because having a baby gets you a baby. Getting hit in the nuts doesn’t suddenly make a baby. I mean, depending on how it happens I guess.
So one is painful for a few minutes, the other gives you a long lasting debuff. That’s really not helping your case.
If there’s a single person in the world who does not understand this I will be concerned
That’d be part of why they’re single, I guess
i understand how having a baby gets you a baby. i don’t understand hiw that’s a desirable outcome
You don’t HAVE to get kicked in the nuts anymore than you “have to” kiss your partner. It’s called foreplay. But it’s pretty common?
I mean getting hit in the nuts makes someone a baby 😎
More of a fetus really. At least position-wise
Fair
it makes the man a crying baby so that’s something right?
I’d way rather get kicked in the nuts than have a baby to deal with.
women’s brains literally give them amnesia regarding the pain of childbirth, so they want another because they aren’t traumatized and don’t really remember the negative side because it’d be evolutionarily disadvantagous to be averse to procreating
getting kicked in the nuts has so such evolutionary pressure, so male brains don’t help out when it happens lol
Yeah people get played by their biological urges and evolutionary psychology throughout the entire process. Even newborn babies are programmed to scream intermittently so that the parents are never well rested, and this is theorized to be to prevent the parents from producing another baby in quick succession who takes attention from baby #1.
Even newborn babies are programmed to scream intermittently so that the parents are never well rested
As someone who has taken care of three newborns, that’s not a requirement. If you put the infant on a regular two/three-hour feeding/changing cycle, they don’t reflexively cry unless they’re in some kind of physical distress.
The trick is to execute that schedule, which is itself extremely exhausting, especially if you’re exclusively breast feeding. When you’ve got two or more people handling feedings (with formula) then the baby is chill and parents get more sleep and everyone is much happier.
Also, ffs, this is why both Mom and Dad need maternity leave. The job is 10x when one parent is working solo.
Just entertaining the thought here -getting kicked in the nuts might be even more evolutionarily disadvantageous, which could help explain the absolutely ridiculous sensitivity. Then again, I’m not a biologist
So wouldn’t that mean that child birth is less painful? Because pain receptors and memory are also evolutionary traits?
only if you care about the average over time. otherwise no, it’s still just as painful. whether the pain is remembered is irrelevant to the feelings in the moment
Isn’t that the same with any pain? I mean I can’t remember how much it hurt when I broke bones or got hit but I remember it hurt a lot. You do get something out of the birth that is worth the pain (big assumptions everyone feels that way) you do not get anything out of being kicked in the nuts or anywhere else (unless it is a kink).
The woman who birthed my child didn’t remember anything of the actual process, the pain is so bad the brain just kinda blocks it out after the fact apparently. I’ve read this is fairly common. One thing I do remember is how bad my hand hurt after all that squeezing, I needed like a whole two ibuprofen to fix it, talk about killer.
I believe it’s a hormone thing because otherwise nobody would have a second kid. Apparently the hormones kick in and make you forget the pain while also giving you a big hit of dopamine so that you connect having a kid to being happy.
Oxytocin is a big one, but I’m struggling to remember the others. I remember that one cuz of a psych class where the professor brought it up as an event that mothers would associate as having some of the highest levels of it. Its considered the bonding hormone, so makes sense we’d bond with our babies so drastically to keep us motivated to care for them after they ripped our lower body apart lol
Are you OK now man?
Clearly this man is watch the most vanilla of porns.
They got is nut
That guy should watch Jackass. Johnny Knoxville became famous for specifically that.
The thing that having a child and jackass have in common is that both led to net positives for the people involved. Jackass guys got rich, mothers that like having kids get another kid. The only way it doesn’t make sense is for people who don’t understand that having kids is rewarding for some people.
There are so many guys who have asked to be kicked in the balls again.
This person has never been to a fucking kink party then has he?
I’ve seen a video of a guy putting his nuts between 2 glass plates held together but 4 screws, 1 in each corner. The women proceeded to tighten the screws with a ratchet until the guys nuts were basically blue and he had to tap out.
Don’t ask me why I watched the whole thing.
Why did you watch the whole thing?
Or watched jackass.
CBT has entered the chat
I’m guessing the ratio might be wildly different.
Harhar
Why is there a giant turd on his shoulder
If you never shat on a ripped naked dude’s shoulder, you’re missing out on life
I don’t know how this is relevant but I upvote anyway
Because you don’t gain anything from being kicked in the nuts.
Speak for yourself.
I don’t gain anything from being kicked in the nuts
We don’t
You gain pain, and if you are unlucky a slew of side effects.
Yep. If you had to go through excruciating pain just to nut. You’d gladly take a kick or two.
Funny how often childbirth is brought up to describe how much more painful something else is, usually by people who have never given births themselves.
Guys who are into cbt: are you sure?
Daniel Craig and Mads Mikkelsen in black and white, looking very handsome
Daniel: this better not awaken something in me
To be fair there are men who are into ball busting. They would actually legit be asking to be hit in the nuts again.
The logic is sound, but the math doesn't check out.
I know it’s supposed to be a joke but this is such a common but braindead take
There’s things I would get kicked in the nuts for. Like another cup size
I do think that in a truly just world, anyone who preaches Quiverful child baring should be kicked in the nuts at least once for every child they claim they want to have.
Fucking Quiverfull. Eugenics bad, but I really hate those fucks.
Hell, line em up, tell them to grab ankles, and I’ll take care of it with a pair of pruning shears.
Neither scenario touches the torture I endure the morning after pepper-heavy, spicy Mexican food.
Ya’ll have some weird GI systems…
Obviously weak bloods are excluded
Kidney stones > kicked in the nuts.
I have heard kidney stones is more in the vein of child birthing.
I mean now when we all talk about things we really don’t know much stuff about.
While there are actually more painful things than childbirth (some people who gave birth can attest), getting kicked in the nuts is clearly not one of them.
Nutblows don’t give you dat sweet sweet oxy
The comments are totally going to rlbe reasonable with this one😅
Interesting logic though 😅
that’s because they asked to get kicked in the nuts by saying shit like “getting kicked in the nuts is more painful then giving birth”
meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Objection!
Exhibit A: Jackass unrated 3 pack DVD box set
WraithGear@lemmy.world 2 days ago
The fact it’s a three pack is just… chefs kiss