jsomae
@jsomae@lemmy.ml
- Comment on No JS, No CSS, No HTML: online "clubs" celebrate plainer websites 2 hours ago:
Passing information between two simultaneously existing entities? Get outta here! All cultures use the Jung collective unconscious to store knowledge!
- Comment on It's a tragedeigh 4 hours ago:
In my daily dealings with fellow queers™, I find most people say “LGBT” in casual speech instead of other variations of the acronym, occasionally adding the “Q”, but I’ve never heard somebody casually drop a “LGBTQIA+.” I think we all know that LGBT is inclusive; that, or there’s a silent ellipsis at the end.
- Comment on It's a tragedeigh 5 hours ago:
To be honest, I think we should just switch to using “queer” at this point. The Q covers everything.
- Comment on They are so dumb they want to piss everyone off for a lousy 15 minutes 5 hours ago:
I don’t really understand what’s being implied here. Isn’t 30 > 15?
- Comment on Judge Rules Training AI on Authors' Books Is Legal But Pirating Them Is Not 1 day ago:
It seems the subject of AI causes lemmites to lose all their braincells.
- Comment on Judge Rules Training AI on Authors' Books Is Legal But Pirating Them Is Not 1 day ago:
Please read the comment more carefully. The observation is that one can proliferate a (legally-attained) work without running afoul of copyright law if one can successfully argue that
cp
constitutes AI. - Comment on spicy one 1 day ago:
Yeah, fair enough, I do agree that this is largely driven by capitalism, and if we didn’t have a capitalist society we would hopefully be going about this more cautiously. Still, I feel like it’s a unique enough situation that I would consider it its own x-risk.
- Comment on Yes, this is what people did back then 1 day ago:
That makes sense, and “just” is a filler word in English. I can see why in another language like German this would work fine. But in English, at least to me, this seems exceptionally clunky. The simplest explanation is simply that “just” isn’t generally used in a context where “what” is been elided, but maybe there’s a deeper reason why it sounds odd to me.
- Comment on Yes, this is what people did back then 2 days ago:
you’ve omitted “just.” If “just” were not in the sentence I would have instinctively filled it in with the missing words you’ve suggested. But I can’t reconcile “just” with any parse.
- Comment on spicy one 2 days ago:
Ok, so to be clear, you’re saying that AI x-risk is already partially or even mostly bundled under “We end stratified society and power disparity, or we die.”?
- Comment on spicy one 2 days ago:
Not to mention skynet. It always bothers me when people leave AI out of lists of x-risks. I guess it’s because a popular sci-fi movie predicted it would happen, so nobody takes it seriously. Or perhaps it’s just because AI is so unpopular now, nobody wants to devote any time to thinking about the ramifications of it becoming smarter.
- Comment on YouTube Will Add an AI Slop Button Thanks to Google’s Veo 3 3 days ago:
Hate slop, but I also approve of anything that makes it easier to wrest IPs away from Hollywood. Feeling conflicted and pessimistic.
- Comment on Yes, this is what people did back then 3 days ago:
I didn’t say xor.
- Comment on Tesla In 'Self-Drive Mode' Hit By Train After Turning Onto Train Tracks 3 days ago:
Self-driving not being reliable yet is one of the biggest disappointments of the last decade.
- Comment on Yes, this is what people did back then 3 days ago:
Am I stupid or is this sentence unparseable?
- Comment on Why is the progress pride flag so poorly designed (especially the intersex progress pride flag)? Will it be redesigned? 3 days ago:
I’m responding to the claim that everyone on the progress flag is already included on the pride flag. I am not expressing an opinion about whether a flag should or should not represent whatever group of people. Am I wrong that the person I am responding to implied that this?
- Comment on Why is the progress pride flag so poorly designed (especially the intersex progress pride flag)? Will it be redesigned? 3 days ago:
and…?
- Comment on Operation Narnia: Iran’s nuclear scientists reportedly killed simultaneously using special weapon 3 days ago:
the word “kill” is typically used in warfare, not murder, so I’m not sure why you would say in this instance that it was written as though it wasn’t an act of war.
- Comment on Why is the progress pride flag so poorly designed (especially the intersex progress pride flag)? Will it be redesigned? 3 days ago:
Even if that were what he’s doing, I would still avoid using it as I’m a supporter of the public domain on principle. If something is essentially public domain, it should be fully public domain.
- Comment on Why is the progress pride flag so poorly designed (especially the intersex progress pride flag)? Will it be redesigned? 3 days ago:
Not sure why you would ask that. I’m responding to this claim:
It was meant to include everyone under the rainbow so trans people and others are already included.
- Comment on Why is the progress pride flag so poorly designed (especially the intersex progress pride flag)? Will it be redesigned? 4 days ago:
pride flag indeed.
- Comment on Why is the progress pride flag so poorly designed (especially the intersex progress pride flag)? Will it be redesigned? 4 days ago:
The progress flag is copyrighted by one Daniel Quasar, and he sporadically exercises his copyright on people who use the sell designs involving the progress flag. Or so I’ve heard. Anyway, for this reason, I avoid using it.
- Comment on Why is the progress pride flag so poorly designed (especially the intersex progress pride flag)? Will it be redesigned? 4 days ago:
Was it meant to represent black and indigenous people?
- Comment on Why is the progress pride flag so poorly designed (especially the intersex progress pride flag)? Will it be redesigned? 4 days ago:
This is the very reason I’m surprised. These flags come and go by the winds of memetics; so why is it that this design is somehow able to propagate so well despite being so clearly visually incoherent?
I’m not necessarily complaining, I’m just astonished that it caught on. Like imagine if a really discordant and structureless song became super popular.
- Comment on Study finds persistent spike in hate speech on X 4 days ago:
Constantly means habitually. I can’t even begin to formulate an apology for persistent spike though.
- Comment on What's the best way to respond to a family member who says the COVID vaccines are being used to depopulate? 5 days ago:
It’s to my benefit if other people take the time to fix their broken and bigoted family members. I wouldn’t recommend someone sever times. Just because you have had experience with stubborn people who can’t change doesn’t mean most people are like that.
- Comment on What's the best way to respond to a family member who says the COVID vaccines are being used to depopulate? 5 days ago:
good idea, i’m sure they’ll get better on their own
- Comment on A Completely Natural Conversation in the NYC Reddit 6 days ago:
Just so everyone knows – in case you hadn’t heard – you can save 30% on your car insurance by switching to Geico.
- Comment on What the fuck 6 days ago:
I’d be at a loss if I saw that, too.
- Comment on I'm gonna mute this one 1 week ago:
who here said both sides same?