Is birth citizenship that common? Won’t work here in Germany for example…
Having a baby? Use this one weird trick!
Submitted 10 hours ago by Genius@lemmy.zip to [deleted]
https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/3a25502a-a3cd-4006-9f3b-09417d71e0ee.webp
Comments
whome@discuss.tchncs.de 3 hours ago
Dozzi92@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Literally zero European countries do it. It seems to be in the Americas only, and Chad and Tanzania. The concept that this is some human right apparently only applies to he US.
LorIps@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
None in Europe
Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Well your kid won’t get citizenship, but you’ll be able to afford to birth them.
Kualdir@feddit.nl 9 hours ago
merc@sh.itjust.works 3 hours ago
coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe 6 hours ago
What if I go to the gray countries? Do I despawn?
BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 hours ago
You can’t go there until the next expansion.
WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 5 hours ago
They have deathright citizenship. You automatically become a citizen if you die in their territory.
neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
Green: unlimited birthright citizenship Red: Limited birthright Citizenship Gray: (At least from my own country, Switzerland): No birthright citizenship
Kualdir@feddit.nl 5 hours ago
Either no data or they do not have birthright citizenship
rustyfish@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Chad it is then.
Kualdir@feddit.nl 9 hours ago
What a chad move
Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 9 hours ago
Chile would be good. It has a fairly strong passport, which I believe is stronger than the USA one in 2025 (before Trump), since it can still travel to the EU visa free.
alxmg@slrpnk.net 2 hours ago
You got a very loose concept of “nazi”
Kualdir@feddit.nl 2 hours ago
You are aware I’m talking about birthright citizenship here yes?
spicytuna62@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
I told my wife we’re going on an extended vacation in Kenya. She sounds stoked.
cmbabul@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
I need to tell my brother to vacation in Uruguay this winter
expatriado@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
among latam countries, probably the best one to move to now
taiyang@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Might I suggest a second good reason for South American countries— when nuclear war hits the US, and it will, the southern hemisphere has a shot of surviving a nuclear winter. Billions will die but mostly in the northern hemisphere, even after accounting for fallout spread.
Ofiuco@lemmy.cafe 4 hours ago
México is on it’s way to fascism so… Might want to check somewhere else
AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Didn’t they just elect a fairly liberal president?
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 hours ago
Doesn’t work in most countries. Being stateless isn’t very fun.
Geodad@lemm.ee 7 hours ago
US citizenship comes from the mother, if born abroad. The baby would automatically be a US citizen, possibly have dual citizenship.
Takumidesh@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Most countries don’t have birthright citizenship.
LyD@lemmy.ca 4 hours ago
The mother or the father, and it depends on circumstances. The rules are more strict when the father is the US citizen.
ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
Haha, that’s not how it works outside the US.
HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
*for the most part.
Some places it does.
ChilledPeppers@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Come to Brazil!
Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 hours ago
TIL the rest of the Americas don’t exist
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 6 hours ago
As much as people are criticizing the proposed changes to this concept in the US, yes, this is true. In many countries that are arguably more free and democratic than the US even, this is not the way citizenship works and the post comes off as uninformed.
jaybone@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
And weren’t they talking about getting rid of “birth right” citizenship in the US? So that might not even be how it works in the US anymore.
4am@lemm.ee 6 hours ago
They can’t without a constitutional amendment. They might still try to argue that the current constitution says something it doesn’t; they might just extrajudicially say “fuck you” to it.
But the only ones talking about it are assholes and - to be clear - not a majority of Americans.
Corigan@lemm.ee 5 hours ago
Also airlines won’t let a pregnant woman travel at that point
0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
Is that true? Sounds kind of discriminatory.
mEEGal@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
sounds more like they don’t need a medical emergency mid flight aka 10km above the ocean
kiagam@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
If a doctor clears you, they can’t deny it.
Dozzi92@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Sure they can. “My doctor said I can!” Well, they say you can’t. Why would a doctor’s note get you on an airplane?
Juice@midwest.social 3 hours ago
Hah! Good luck finding one
kiagam@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Which is really only used in the americas. Europe/Asia doesn’t use it, except in specific circumstances where the child wouldn’t be eligible for citizenship elsewhere.
lorthirk@feddit.it 3 hours ago
Not in Italy
AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space 10 hours ago
Don’t choose Germany, though, we (and a lot of nations, actually) still for some reason have citizenship-by-blood/heritage laws more or less straight out of the 19th century, not citizenship-by-birthplace laws.
BurnoutDV@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
As a German myself I would like to here some arguments why citizen by the place you happen to be at birth is better?
AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space 9 hours ago
Basically: Resident enfranchisement. It’s weird, when people born in our country and having lived here their whole life can’t vote outside of local elections. My own father, for example, had a Dutch background, and was never allowed to vote in federal elections until his death. (Neither he nor I even spoke/speak a single phrase of Dutch)
Yes, things have gotten somewhat better and easier with applications for citizenship, but that there are hurdles like that to begin with, is a bit… weird.
aleats@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 hours ago
Both jus soli (citizenship by birth) and jus sanguinis (citizenship by blood) exist more for historical reasons than because one is better than the other. Both are simply a way to try and make citizenship a more clear-cut thing, because it’s as close to being a made-up thing as you can get, especially in cases such as parents having a different nationality to the child (which is even more confusing when both parents are of different nationalities).
Jus soli is more common in the Americas due to various factors, including an incentive towards immigration from richer countries during colonial times and the various movements towards emancipation of the enslaved peoples a few centuries later, but the fact remains that neither system is any more arbitrary than the other. Jus soli is often favored because it simplifies things like immigration and asylum seeking and reduces statelessness, which is still a significant issue that affects millions of people worldwide, mostly around war-torn areas.
As mentioned in another response, enfranchisement is also a very important issue that jus soli resolves, although a significant part of it is also due to other, unrelated citizenship laws that may not necessarily conflict with jus sanguinis.
LesserAbe@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Why would citizenship be based on who your parents are?
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 hours ago
Citizenship by blood can be discriminating to children of immigrants. Say, you’re born in USA and spent all your life in there, would be spit on the face not considering you as a citizen
jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 8 hours ago
No European country has unrestricted jus soli for nationality. Ireland was the last one to restrict nationality by-soil to children of long term legal residents, which is the same as Germany.
grue@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
I wish. My ancestors moved to the US from Germany in the 19th or early 20th century, but I’m pretty sure I’m not eligible for German citizenship.
st33lb0ne@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Here`s the fun part… you dont need an anker baby to come live in the EU. I think alot of countries here would welcome Americans who had enough of Trump
Bruncvik@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Ireland: Proof of residency for 3 out of the last 4 years before the child gets an Irish passport. It’s enough to present utility bills or paychecks for that period. I did it, and my kids only have Irish passports (even though they’d be entitled to both) until they are old enough to make their own decision in this matter. Or Trump decides to expand his golf course to the entire island.
Raiderkev@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Goon holidays are the best kind of holiday
sirico@feddit.uk 10 hours ago
Best we can do is free health care
kerrigan778@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Uh, very few countries have birthright only citizenship.