TrickDacy
@TrickDacy@lemmy.world
- Comment on Innocent African-American child George Stinney executed after being falsely accused of murdering two white girls | 1944 26 minutes ago:
"it’s not racist if I think it’s true!"
- every racist ever
- Comment on I felt so betrayed when I found out Germany isn't called Germany in Germany 2 days ago:
No shit?!
- Comment on Day 538 of posting a Daily Screenshot from the games I've been playing 3 days ago:
I always have a day once in a while where I feel like I don’t have time to do even the most basic things I have to do. And I’m not a particularly busy person, it’s just something that is bound to happen once every couple months.
- Comment on Outside during the US Capitol during the January 6, 2021 attack on the building 3 days ago:
I wish these terrorists could have their pardons reversed. Those shitbags being pardoned makes a mockery of the concept of justice.
- Comment on Day 538 of posting a Daily Screenshot from the games I've been playing 3 days ago:
I don’t have kids but there’s not a chance I could play games every single day for more than a couple months even if I made it a goal.
- Comment on idk how to title this one man 3 days ago:
What in the absolute fuck is this shit?
- Comment on Microsoft just open-sourced bitnet.cpp, a 1-bit LLM inference framework. It let's you run 100B parameter models on your local CPU without GPUs. 6.17x faster inference and 82.2% less energy on CPUs. 3 days ago:
Microslop*
- Comment on YSK that Chris Hughes, one of the founders of Facebook, says the company must be dismantled 3 days ago:
15 years too late
- Comment on If I go crazy will you still call me Superman? 4 days ago:
Silvergun Superman - stone Temple pilots
- Comment on I've never been in a situation where me having a gun would have made things bettter. 5 days ago:
I read this three times and I’m still pretty lost as to what you’re hinting at
- Comment on Global outrage as X’s Grok morphs photos of women, children into explicit content 1 week ago:
Username checks out
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
People who don’t understand anything should actually just not say anything. Blocked.
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
There’s nothing empathetic about telling strangers heroin isn’t all that harmful
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
It’s not my fault, when you don’t read more than the first sentence
This isn’t about me. It’s about spreading ideas. If you haven’t noticed, not every child reads for hours before drawing a conclusion about the world.
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
“it’s true that a lot of people can handle heroin” is the only message you have successfully sent. All the rest of that won’t be read, and even if it is, it’s still not as insightful as you seem to think.
Some kid might destroy their life because of what you wrote. You’re not only unconcerned with that, you think you’ve somehow been helpful. 🤮
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
Well hopefully mods do their job and remove your pleas that children try heroin. I’m done here with the pretending we’re having a nuanced conversation about societal problems which you didn’t bring up at all until you had your back against a wall.
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
that’s why I think education is so important,
So then you retract your statements that make it seem like opiates are something one can safely experiment with. Good.
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
Why isn’t everyone becoming a junkie?
Because firstly, not everyone has access to those drugs, and secondly, anti-drug messaging has been somewhat effective. Ask 50 random people if heroin should be legal, probably 48-49 say no.
everyone having trouble of getting rid of an opiate addiction, tried to mask some other problems with it.
This is victim blaming, even worse than before. Fucking yikes.
So, why do they do it?
There definitely are people really susceptible to addiction and decided to try it once and never stopped. Because there are a lot of mixed messages in the world about drugs. Many movies and musical acts romanticize drug abuse. Also, life is hard, people are looking for an escape. The last thing we need is people spreading the message that heroin “isn’t that bad”. Young kids are sometimes on this platform and are susceptible to a toxic message like that.
You make it seem like I’m a tee-totaller or something and I’m not. I’m just against the message that hard drugs “aren’t that bad”. It’s harmful. Less people should try highly addictive drugs, not more. Just because some people can “handle it” doesn’t mean it’s a good idea to promote.
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
I could also possibly live years of my life walking in the middle of streets with fast driving cars. But it still would be an absolute fact that it’s a senseless risk to take
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
There is nothing about acknowledging the dangers of highly addictive substances which says we should punish their users. You definitely shifted blame off the substance itself. Which is quite odd to me, unless your goal is to encourage people to use those drugs.
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
It’s a lie to suggest opiates aren’t dangerous and any issue with them should be blamed on anyone else involved. They are incredibly dangerous. It’s absurd I have to even say that.
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
You left an edit that basically blamed people for their mental problems, in service of defending the most dangerously addictive drug maybe to ever exist.
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
I know several people whose lives were entirely wrecked by opiates. This is a dangerous fucking pack of lies that should get you banned for spreading. This is several times worse than spreading anti vaxx rhetoric.
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
That’s an overly kind description of it. I’ve never known anyone to use more than a little opiates without completely obliterating their life, or coming extremely close to doing so.
- Comment on Where's my JUUL? 1 week ago:
Plenty of people use opiates and opioids medically and recreationally to no ill effects.
A dangerous lie that is insane to have not been downvoted dozens of times minimum.
- Comment on Maybe the RAM shortage will make software less bloated? 1 week ago:
They’re a fucking coward. And they’re wrong. That’s why they deleted all their windows-simping comments here.
- Comment on me and who 1 week ago:
Stop fucking posting fake shit that helps republicunts
- Comment on Maybe the RAM shortage will make software less bloated? 1 week ago:
I’m not contradicting myself and I understood all that. You didn’t get what I was saying.
I was simply saying that you want something I’d never want. Has nothing to do with a distaste for email. Has to do with adding stress to my life while also using my system resources. And I was pointing out the only non-stress difference is I have to click once to open my email and it loads very fast. I wouldn’t see any value in what you see as a minimum requirement. I’d actually go to a lot of trouble to disable that if it were on by default lol
It sounds like you’re a person who not only uses chrome but also dozens or hundreds of tabs. I’m opposite to all that. I stand by my claim that Linux performs far better and I suspect I’d think so even if I wanted to run a lot of ram hungry apps at the same time tbh, because I just haven’t experienced literally anything you’re saying.
- Comment on Maybe the RAM shortage will make software less bloated? 1 week ago:
Interesting take…
Another relevant twist of the knife on the Linux side is thunderbird not having a tray icon
What would you need one for?
What is the purpose of an email client that doesn’t stay running 24/7?
Genuinely confused here. To receive email? What’s the purpose of leaving it running all the time? The only difference in the setup I have and what you seem to want is that instead of clicking an email icon on the dock and waiting ~1second, you want to see a notification in the tray? Given that email is 90% noise no matter how many things I unsubscribe from, the last thing I want is a constant stream of notifications on yet another device.
I feel like specifically because I run Linux all my apps launch faster so yes I prefer to close them when not in use. Feels a lot cleaner for my mental model. Don’t get me wrong, I often run 6-8 apps at a time if I need to. But even then I don’t think I go much beyond 8 GB of ram used, unless I’m gaming.
- Comment on Maybe the RAM shortage will make software less bloated? 1 week ago:
It sounds like you have a lot of experience with running out of memory that I don’t have. I’m curious – how much ram do you have in the laptop you switched to windows? I don’t think I’ve experienced running out of memory recently. Been running Linux for like 3 years now and I’ve always felt every possible aspect is far snappier. Regarding ops comment about windows being the ram problem, I think they just were referring to it using a lot of ram, which it does. You’re calling it a few Mb and that’s just not accurate. I can’t say for sure what exact difference it was for me, but years ago I compared windows 10 to pop os. I think the difference was not far from a GB. And we can split hairs about what specifically occupies ram. Services, kernel, third party apps. The fact is that windows culture is different in a very bad way. You have to opt out of apps running on startup constantly, manually checking settings under an “advanced” tab often… I vastly prefer the culture of bloat being opt-in in almost every case. There are dozens of reasons I prefer Linux but the fact that it just runs faster without effort specifically to make that happen, is atop the list.