Dasus
@Dasus@lemmy.world
- Comment on Huge study finds no evidence cannabis helps anxiety, depression, or PTSD 2 days ago:
You need more CBD (cannabidiol) in your cannabis.
- Comment on This robotic hand has such sensitive touch that it can grasp objects as fragile as a potato chip or a raspberry without crushing them 3 days ago:
“I’m not reading your comments. Or the Wikipedia links. Because reading is dumb! >:(”
I don’t understand how people like you don’t realise how it seems to admit to willfully being ignorant online.
Just because you can’t read more than a single sentence without looking at your phone doesn’t mean we all do. Some of us enjoy reading and writing. And that “some of us” does not contain you. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Comment on This robotic hand has such sensitive touch that it can grasp objects as fragile as a potato chip or a raspberry without crushing them 4 days ago:
onto your keyboard and reply with human words instead of having a clanker do the work for you. It’s obvious with your lazy replies
Gee, thanks buddy. I remember like 20 years ago when people used to super snide much in a similar way as you are now. Only it was “it’s obvious you have wall hacks” because I listened a little bit better than they did. It feels just, so good.
Who the fuck would use an AI to write forum replies? You, probably. Or someone you know. See you accuse me of being friendly with machines when you call yourself “a real machinist.”
Your dumbfounded “I’ll not open your Wikipedia links without explanation”-ignorance is the reason I come to forums like these. I enjoy watching you get upset and project a ton. :)
- Comment on This robotic hand has such sensitive touch that it can grasp objects as fragile as a potato chip or a raspberry without crushing them 4 days ago:
Time enjoyed is time not wasted.
- Comment on This robotic hand has such sensitive touch that it can grasp objects as fragile as a potato chip or a raspberry without crushing them 4 days ago:
Oh noo, he insulted my profile picture and said to go be elsewhere. :(
Such brilliance of rhetoric, the mind is positively dazzled in your presence!
- Comment on This robotic hand has such sensitive touch that it can grasp objects as fragile as a potato chip or a raspberry without crushing them 4 days ago:
Ofc you won’t, you’re a real machinist. Duh.
- Comment on This robotic hand has such sensitive touch that it can grasp objects as fragile as a potato chip or a raspberry without crushing them 4 days ago:
No, you’re not. You’re just wrong on the internet.
- Comment on This robotic hand has such sensitive touch that it can grasp objects as fragile as a potato chip or a raspberry without crushing them 4 days ago:
Lol what a fucking strawman.
- Comment on This robotic hand has such sensitive touch that it can grasp objects as fragile as a potato chip or a raspberry without crushing them 4 days ago:
It’s not magic.
- Comment on Bring Back the Burned CD— They’re a love language. And a reminder of the hope we once had. 4 days ago:
CDs and had this phone stuck up my ass
Kids will think you’re joking, but the vibration on those things was a proper… well, vibrator.
Nothing like getting a text from your crush with your phone in your crotch for her/him having indirectly caused you sexual pleasure.
(Also we did actually have contests on who’d throw their phone the highest without failing to catch it. And the throw were easily 5-15 meters high. And lots of misses. But not a single disabled phone. Small scratches on the covers maybe, but you could also buy new covers so it was no problem.)
- Comment on Normal 6 days ago:
That was a relatively recent invention
Idk man I think the paleolithic predates ancient Egypt.
Most date from the Gravettian period (26,000–21,000 years ago).[1] However, findings are not limited to this period; for example, the Venus of Hohle Fels dates back at least 35,000 years to the Aurignacian era, and the Venus of Monruz dates back about 11,000 years to the Magdalenian, and the Catalhoyuk figurine[2], 8000 years old.
- Comment on My kind of Doctor 1 week ago:
- Comment on fuck it, just paste your clipboard in the comments 1 week ago:
“Animals are something invented by plants to move seeds around. An extremely yang solution to a peculiar problem which they faced.” -Terence McKenna
- Comment on cigs w/o u 1 week ago:
But he was always sucking on his fags and he paid for them fair and square.
And do you have any idea how high fags are taxed in this day and age?
It’s not like when I was a boy. I was sucking fags left and right without a care in the world about paying for them. Granted pretty often they were the cheaper sort that you got from cruise-boats, tax free.
Pic related, it’s one of those boats for cruising. I’ve also heard them referred to as “fuckboats” but honestly it’s more the tax-free that pulls in people.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
To each their own, but I’ve never changed an opinion because of the quantity of people who believe I was wrong.
Somewhat relevant or not:
pcgamer.com/…/company-that-makes-generative-ai-po…
(still doesn’t affect LLM’s being trained of stolen material by entities who get upset when you share even a mb of their IP illegally, and LLM’s being powerhhungry fuckers, but I believe some of those smaller and more economic models could perhaps be worthwhile, and some NPC LLM set in skyrim shouldn’t need as much training as Gemini trying to be omniscient)
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
“I’d purposefully avoid talking about gun control”
Found the American.
Gun control works as surely as antibiotics do and people denying it are brainwashed yanks >99% of the time
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
We’re not even close to the thread max, you’re just desperate to run away.
Because just like all the other kids, your letting your ego control you. Quite manly of you, really. Usually it’s teenage boys who have these tantrums. I genuinely wish you’re at most 25 and not an actual adult, because if you are, you’re gonna have a real tough time with your life. Although I don’t think I need to worry too much about it, since the worst insults you can imagine are “garglebargle” spam and “you’re probably a virgin”. Like what is this, 8th grade? :D
So, no more “lol look at how many paragraphs you’re writing” because I actually like writing, whereas you’re “wasting your time” as you put it.
Doesn’t matter how much you cry, you still say you believe in things which have no scientific support. And that just drives you mad realising how everyone is laughing at you, so you’re *itching" to run from the thread. But you can’t, since your ego won’t let you. :((
Men seem to be the better shooter than women, especially when shooting handguns.
gracefulinsights.space/blog/who-shoots-better
Now isn’t that weird? I can just imagine how furiously you’re googling something to find against it, but can’t and I can almost hear the steam whistling in your ears. Too bad, deary, won’t change the facts of life. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
Ah yes, back to pretending like you were never serious at all, even though that also implies you weren’t serious about women being better marksmen, even though you can’t actually admit to that.
Why do you kids never believe me when I say I’ve seen this tantrum you’re having hundreds of times?
Like I said, it’s alright for you to be religious and not understand science. Many people are. And your agreement isn’t needed, as you’re showing everyone. :)
Maybe it’s because you have a hard time reading actual hard science, and need someone to simplify it for you…?
This is seemingly an American woman, so you’ll feel comfortable with her language.
Most shooting instructors, both men and women, will happily tell you women are better shooters than men, followed by anecdotes to support their claim. But is this really true? Since I am a researcher, I do not believe in anecdotal evidence. I want the hard scientific facts. So, I did a little research on this topic sharing here with you what I found
Summarizing the findings of all these studies, I came to the following conclusions: Men seem to be the better shooter than women, especially when shooting handguns.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
Saying stuff doesn’t make it true, and willfully refusing to accept science showed at you makes you a religious person who will be sorely mocked.
I mean, you are publicly shaming yourself with this tantrum, but on top of that. :)
- Comment on Hackers Expose The Massive Surveillance Stack Hiding Inside Your “Age Verification” Check 1 week ago:
I’m literally just in the comment section now to post a gif saying something along those lines but you beat me to the comment so I’m just gonna post a gif here Image
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
I don’t think you know what the word means, tbh.
You can check my history, dozens of kids there having tantrums exactly like yours, where they can’t talk about what they said earlier in the thread. Start avoiding. Then a little bit of “lol you waste your time writing paragraphs” to let me know how you’re actually disliking this. Again I’m not. :))
I’m getting “tons of enjoyment out of it” or whatever you said a day or two ago.
Sorry girls are better shots and you cant handle that. Its just objectively true.
Sorry, hunny, we’ve been over this. Something you believe but science says isn’t true isn’t “objectively true”, it’s “subjective delusion”, ie religion. (Although organized religion is sort of objective delusion as well.)
I know you don’t even register it when you see science but for the umpteenth time:
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068418/
Pistol and Rifle Performance: Gender and Relative Age Effect Analysis
Conclusions: The main conclusions of the study are: (1) the men’s pistol performance is better than the women’s even though RAE is not associated to the shooting score in any case; (2) men and women performed equally in the general analysis, but their performances were different depending on category and event with no RAE influence.
What’s that sentence?
men’s pistol performance is better
On a scales of 1 to PMS, how annoyed are you…?;>>
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
I wonder how old you are.
Usually it takes a day or two for you to realise how childish you’re being, just because you felt a bit silly when someone pointed out something you think is true was a myth.
But you’ll get there. Now it’s just a childish compulsion to answer, because you think you’ll get “the last word” ie “win” a thread if you can be the last comment in it, no matter what preschool word-salad you vomit. It doesn’t work that way. You’re just publicly making an idiot of yourself. I’ve seen this literally hundreds if not thousands of times. It always ends the same.
Because I like writing and am not delusional nor super upset (or "butthurt as the kids say.) None of which seem to apply to you. So now you’re just digging your pit deeper and deeper. Enjoy. ;>
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
Another miss with the preschool insults.
Your aim really doesn’t seem to be as good as you made it out to be.
I can show you my gold marskmen medals from the army though, but again, that wouldn’t mean men nor women are better marksmen. Just that I got gold scores in the army.
As I kinda doubt yours. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
By definition, you are, though.
You said you don’t care there’s no science to prove “girls are better marksmen anyway”, yet when it’s pointed out to you, you get a tantrum. Much like religious people when you point out how ridiculous they are.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
I have no need to “let it go”.
I’m on forums because I like it. How did you put it… “it riles people up and gives me a ton of joy.”*
My mom is also dead btw. Dad went last year grandma and mom this year. So idk, since you’re religious you’re probably gonna feel all bad about making jokes about dead people.
I find it hilarious that I can quote you back at you, while all you can do is spam nonsense. It’s not like anyone’s going to notice you’re desperately avoiding mentioning why you’re even in the thread to begin with. Can’t mention that you said “women are better markmen anyway”, especially not with how the votes stand on those.
You keep getting madder. I just enjoy writing. ;>
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
Oh so yeah you don’t believe women are better marksmen. Good that we cleared that delusion of yours right up. :)
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
So, refusing to answer whether everything is a shitpost and you’re not actually a better shooter than men in general?
A whole paragraph. Do you feel like you’re “wasting time”?
Real mature looking profile btw. (I didn’t check it, but I’d assume, with comments like that.)
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
You know everyone can see you spamming nonsense, right?
Just because there’s no science to prove women are better marksmen, you take that as a personal offense so bad you just can’t let go. I’ve seen this exact tantrum hundreds of times. Last time a day or two ago.
It always goes the same way. You can’t address why you’re in the thread and try mocking people on forums for… using forums for writing things… while at the same time writing things like “k lol” or “didn’t read lol”. I fail to see how you think it’s a positive thing, but anyway, that’s what usually happens.
We’ll see how much you follow the pattern
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
More incoherent bullshit. I love it when I prove someone’s quite wrong, you know, scientifically speaking, and then they get so upset they just can’t let go unless they think they “get the last word.”
I don’t think like that, but I meet this daily. I have to say, usually it’s from men, because women tend to not let their egos control them.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 week ago:
Ah, but you get so angry from someone posting that you regress into a child who writes
So it was “shitposting” when you said you shoot better than guys? Yeah I kinda saw that coming. No wörries.
