chat is this satire
Peter Thiel’s bestie going mask off
Submitted 8 months ago by andros_rex@lemmy.world to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/e05c5059-6b09-408d-85d3-5fcf6d13247d.jpeg
Comments
axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 8 months ago
tastetheplague@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
“Profoundly negrous” is fucking crazy man.
hellomoto@lemmings.world 8 months ago
Right, like he’s so comfortable with this language. He’s well into living on another planet where phrases like this are common place.
dellish@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I thought he meant naggers.
6stringringer@lemmy.zip 8 months ago
Picking up on what has been put down. We get a groove goin’. Show me yo face. Nah, Nevermind. These bass ackwards step chumps will hopefully undefine. _
ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
I… what does that even mean?
Kurious84@lemmings.world 8 months ago
No idea. I do think billionaires are a serious problem and shouldn’t be allowed. Dont care how many business they start. They have the power to buy elections and play games with our entire world so fuck em.
LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 8 months ago
He is a racial narcissist (and racial fascist) who has narcissistic delusions about race that are his projections of his own insecurity. He gets narcissistic supply from people responding to his delusions as if they are real. Which is why narcissists crave proximity and control so much and are fascists, because their biggest goal in life is to cater and caretake their delusions, not to actually think or do things or be progressive. It’s about the appearance of those things because it was always about narcissistic supply in the first place.
Most white men who are racial narcissists believe in:
- physical narcissism, which they believe black men are superior to them due to eugenics from chattel slavery, including a belief that they are stronger, their dicks are better and they are better at sex (this is a REALLY big deal to them, more than you would realize). This is also why white supremacists wanted to EAT and DID EAT black slaves. It’s also why they have to push narratives that black people are ugly, phrenology, etc. It’s why they are so physically cruel to them - they overabuse them because they are physically insecure.
- intellectual narcissism, which they believe they are superior to black people because of chattel slavery/owning them (aka sadistic and psychopathic abuse, not intellect) and the various white supremacy lies. This is why they don’t like DEI. Again, remember this is projection- it’s their own deepest insecurities they vomit out constantly through delusions.
Then these delusions can be applied to others not even in that group, because it was never based on reality to begin with. That’s why he’s calling white people the n word, he simply wants supply and it doesn’t matter if what he says makes sense or is rational.
Tldr; Curtis Yarvin believes his own dick is small, he is bad in bed, he is weak, and he is stupid
ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
Where I’m lost is does this mean he thinks billionaires are too overly physically prowessed, or because they are insufficiently intellectual?
Dasus@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Sure, yeah, but none of that explains what billionaires being “negrous” means? Like something something connect them with the same negative attributes that they keep going on about?
Can white billionaires be “negrous”?
grrgyle@slrpnk.net 8 months ago
Fascinating. I never understood why the cuckolding fetish (fixation? obsession?) came with such a strong overlap with, I guess, race play? Feels like a charitable way to put it.
I didn’t believe it at first, but any quick web search will show that cuckolding largely is about the races of the people involved.
Which makes a lot more sense if seen through the framework you just described.
rozodru@lemmy.world 8 months ago
ok I’m going to TRY to explain his thinking but I’m likely going to come off as racist trying to explain it.
What he’s saying is there are those who earned their wealth via hard work and all that other bullshit and others that just got it handed to them or give off the impression that they’re insanely wealthy when “they’re not”.
this is what he likely means when he says “n-word rich”. Because this morons impression of wealth in the Black community is via watching music videos and watching reality TV. He’s watched way too many youtube vids about such and such Black music artist or athlete who wears all this “bling” has all these cars and a huge mansion with nothing in it but meanwhile said person is broke. that’s what he means by “n-word rich”.
he could have just said “The problems the majority of billionaires aren’t actually billionaires. They just think they are.”
dariusj18@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Some people like to rebrand the n-word as a non-racial term. Pretending that it is not tied to skin color or racism but behavior.
Wolf@lemmy.today 8 months ago
That’s what I thought he was saying at first, but that still doesn’t even make any sense though. You are either a billionaire or you are not. I don’t know of anyone who goes around claiming to be a billionaire when they are not, and I could probably name a few who are but never mention it.
Also why would it be a problem? Is he saying there is not enough of a wealth gap? That’s demonstrably false.
And what’s with the nature and function bit?
Sounds to me he’s just spouting hatred to be provocative without any real point.
6stringringer@lemmy.zip 8 months ago
😱
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 8 months ago
There is no mask when you’re already ‘Peter Thiel’s bestie’
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Curtis Yarvin is an endashger.
theacharnian@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
The most benevolent reading of his idea here is that the rich are shallow and are content with the base material satisfactions afforded them by wealth, as opposed to using their wealth for some kind of greatness.
That’s it. That’s the whole idea.
So this is the wise sage of the dark enlightenment? This is the intellectual colossus shaping the thinking of the new tech elite?
There is nothing there. Any random village priest (or small town pastor for you yanks) has more intellectual depth in their Sunday sermon than this.
Fontasia@feddit.nl 8 months ago
www.instagram.com/reel/DMLJh0SRz9o/ this is my favourite review of the latest Superman and I believe says it even more directly than the tweet
Wolf@lemmy.today 8 months ago
I thought the movie was ok, but it triggering right wing nutjobs is hilarious.
answersplease77@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Omg! this was unexpectedly good!! I almost stopped watching after the first minute thinking it’s another “hollywood movie nerd” talking about imaginary superheros that fly and shoot lazers from their eyes… Then suddenly my guy “the hollywood movie nerd” switched to real mode really quick just before you thought you could sleep on him! This guy! that was awesome!
FrostbittenDuck@lemmy.zip 8 months ago
I’m pretty sure you won’t get banned for using the hard R on Twitter anymore, so what is the actual point? I mean, even if you did, avoiding the actual word wouldn’t trick anyone into thinking you mean anything but what you do.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 months ago
peter thiels bestie, was allegedly defenestrated last year, his boytoy , not his husband.
answersplease77@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Did he elaborate further on what that means? Seriously, where’s the original tweet? there’s no way nobody ask this racist twat in replies to explain to layman non-philosophers like us what is n-word rich billionares, and what he sees as a problem with his best friends Peter Thiel and Elon Musk? does he mean they they are leeching lazy mutants on society? does he meam they exaggerate or waste their wealth where it should not go? Is he criticizing them or is he actually with classism and billionares but just wants them to get their act together and invest in better things? is that something of the billionare-class shortcomings or does he oppose America’s form of capitilism which lead to their existence?
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 8 months ago
Of course he meant Nerdier billionaires! Silicon Valley must go!
lipilee@feddit.nl 8 months ago
Can someone explain to me, a european, what nigger rich means?
parlaptie@feddit.org 8 months ago
Yikes dude, even Peter Thiel hat the good sense to censor the slur.
lipilee@feddit.nl 8 months ago
And i guarantee you that he’s still more racist than i am… but okay, my comme t is removed now, and nobody cared to explain the actual source of the term, i learned from it anyway.
rikudou@lemmings.world 8 months ago
We in Europe tend to not be afraid of words and censoring them feels pretty pointless. It’s just a word, it’s the context that gives it meaning, which in this case was educational. If you go calling people slurs then obviously the context changes, but on its own it’s just a word.
Jankatarch@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Racist slur.
EarthshipTechIntern01@lemmy.world 8 months ago
The appropriate words to put in there are Nigglers. Cause they are all niggler-rich. They niggle away at us: pay me for this pay me for that. They didn’t do any work or produce anything but a stranglehold on their workers (niggling away their/your hours for niggled pay).
Lynch the Nigglers. Billionaires & corporations. Lynch em all.
iamdisappoint@reddthat.com 8 months ago
Em dash! AI wrote this trash… /s
lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 8 months ago
Am I the only one reading n—ers as nooners?
WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Obviously he means naggers.
YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 8 months ago
Nodders. A term of endearment for people with narcolepsy to use asking themselves.
buddascrayon@lemmy.world 8 months ago
At what point do we start tagging him with “racist sympathizer Peter Thiel”?
sith@lemmy.zip 8 months ago
Is there any point in doing that? All these guys are openly racist, anti-democracy and anti-america. Enemies of the state by definition (a state which is almost entierly under their control by now). We’re way beyond calling out on racism.
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
And all my neighbors are still on board with Trump. Drives me nuts.
MrSulu@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
En masse, as soon as we can.
theneverfox@pawb.social 8 months ago
You know what… You run with that. I have no idea wtf it means, but if you stay pointed at the billionaires…
Well, a piece of shit launched at my enemy isn’t my friend, but I’m not going to get in it’s way either
bravesentry@feddit.org 8 months ago
he apparently has no problem with the billionaire part of their existence, so no. fuck him.
theneverfox@pawb.social 8 months ago
Don’t interrupt your enemy’s enemy dumbass
I’m not saying they’re your friend, just don’t interrupt the fight. Use it. Let them fight
Don’t interrupt two enemies who are making a mistake, don’t be a fucking idiot. Use the opportunity, win.
That’s all that matters - win and never forget why you did it
phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Our problem is niner billionaires?
Or is he referring to black people while being a giant dildo?
If so, I have a serious question? How many black people out there are billionaires? Seriously, of all billionaires in the world, how many are black? I mean, I’m sure there are some but I have never heard of them.
of all problems with billionaires, skin color seriously seriously is the least.
Phegan@lemmy.world 8 months ago
He is really fucking dumb, in addition to, being an absolute piece of shit.
arsCynic@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
Moron. Next please.
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 8 months ago
CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 8 months ago
Oh Curtis Yavin, JD Vance’s favourite political philosopher.
blackwateropeth@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Hahaha, what the fuck does that even mean??? What a clown
WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
From Meriam-Webster’s entry on the word
Did the definition of n----r change?
There is a widespread belief that the original meaning of n----r, as defined in dictionaries, was “an ignorant person,” and a related belief that current dictionary definitions describing its use as a hateful, racist epithet are a recent change. We do not know the source of those beliefs, but they are not accurate. The word was first included in a Merriam-Webster dictionary in 1864, at which time it was defined as a synonym of Negro, with a note indicating that it was used “in derision or depreciation.” There has never been a definition like “an ignorant person” for this word in any subsequent dictionary published by this company. Nor do we know of such a definition in any earlier dictionary.
There’s been an attempt among white racists over the years to try and redeem the hard-r N-word. They’ll say that it originally meant just an ignorant or foolish person in general, not only black people specifically. But this is a historical fiction. It’s always been used as a slur against black people. It was originally a complete synonym for “negro.” If you asked Yarvin, and he didn’t just admit outright to being a flaming racist, he would likely justify it by making a claim like this. He would claim that he’s saying these billionaires are just corrupt and foolish. He would say that it’s OK to use the word, as he’s not referring to black people, just ignorant and lazy people in general. He would say he’s using the non-racist definition of the n-word. But again, this is a historical fiction.
Sometimes racists will cite words like “niggardly”, meaning cheap or stingy, as an example of how the n-word could be used in ways not applying just to black people. Niggardly is a word that sounds like the n-word but actually does have a non-racist history. They’ll try to link niggardly to the hard-r n-word. But what they ignore is that the word niggardly has a completely different etymological root. Niggardly shares roots with words like niggling, tracing back to the 13th century nig, meaning simply a stingy person. The n-word however, as Meriam-Webster notes, derives directly from the Spanish negro.. Racists will connect the n-word to words like niggardly, niggling, etc., citing their real history as non-racist words, and say that the n-word can also be used non-offensively because of this. But there is no common etymological root between the hard-r n-word and similar sounding words that do actually have a non-racist history.
Of course, it’s all ultimately a moot point. In polite society today, most people understandably avoid using any word that remotely sounds like the n-word. See controversies around the word niggardly. And really, there’s little reason to use words like niggardly, even if one could argue that they’re technically not racist. They just sound way too similar, and there’s plenty of other perfectly valid words to use in their place. And ultimately, someone could just as easily be hurt or offended by words that sound similar to the n-word even if they’re technically not directly related. The words are best avoided, as they just end up hurting people for no good reason, even if some etymologist might argue they’re not directly related.
BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 8 months ago
It’s a racist asshole thing. You wouldn’t understand.
nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
It’s the kind of thing where you have to join the KKK and uncritically accept everything you’re told for 20 years and then maybe you’ll be able to fathom it. They will of course mistake that for complex philosophy rather than a steaming pile of horse shit.
potato_wallrus@lemmy.world 8 months ago
What mask?
uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
A century agofuck! About a century and a quarter ago this was the sentiment regarding new-money industrialists by old money landlords.Remove the racist layer and it’s class conflict all the way down.
LuckingFurker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
How is it that the weirdest dudes keep ending up with so much power and influence. Like, this is just bigoted shit obviously, but it’s weird bigoted shit. What is it about people that makes them look at a weirdo freak (derogatory) like this and think “this is a man I need to have direct the entirety of my belief system going forward”?
plyth@feddit.org 8 months ago
Useful idiots. There needs to be somebody who stands in front of the crowd and takes the blame. That person must be weird enough that people don’t keep following once the support is removed.
eletes@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
I think a part of it is you have to be weird to want to chase power. Normal people aren’t thinking 24/7 about how they can leap frog their way into power
naught101@lemmy.world 8 months ago
The other part is that normal people as party of a well functioning society need to actively maintain systems that keep fuckwits from accumulation to much power, and we haven’t been doing that.
AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Then they decide to get makeovers or permanent eyeliner like that’s supposed to make up for all the other weird shit?
shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Social media has accelerated this. No one would know who this guy was in the 90s, for example.
ghterve@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I have zero idea who he is. Or Thiel for that matter …
bss03@infosec.pub 8 months ago
Yeah, why can’t they just be a weirdo freak (celebratory) like the rest of us anarchists?
jj4211@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Success is awarded to the confident. You can be an absolute weird idiot and still, in the right circumstances, get massive success just because people assume there’s a reason you seem so confident, and who are they to second guess that confidence?
SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 8 months ago
That’s literally the only reason Trump is where he is. He’s not actually good at anything.
bss03@infosec.pub 8 months ago
Confidence is often mistaken for competence. I’d like to believe that’s why “con(fidence) men” are ever successful.
WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
This man needs to be hanged for treason.
LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 8 months ago
They need to be asset forfeitured entirely, even of clothes, and anyone who helps them, even by giving them water, should be asset forfeitured too. Let them wander outside naked, drinking from puddles and scrounging for food (not through trash though, that’s illegal, not allowed just like they don’t allow it for poor people who are starving today). Have guards around them to prevent anyone from giving them anything. They don’t like people and society, then they can live without it.
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
So does Peter Theil, Zuck, and Elon.
BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Honestly, there’s no real decoding this. There’s no hidden messages or trying to see the underlying logic.
I’m guessing they’ve either got a little cult where they’ve given specific meaning to this little phrase, or it’s just as dumb as it sounds and makes no sense.
I’m guessing it makes no sense on account of the it not making sense.