grrgyle
@grrgyle@slrpnk.net
- Comment on xkcd #3126: Disclaimer 1 day ago:
I loooove using m dashes. They’re just so—expressive.
- Comment on Time to pluralize titles. 2 days ago:
Actually terrifying.
- Comment on Time to pluralize titles. 2 days ago:
Nice
- Comment on X plans to show ads in Grok chatbot's answers 2 days ago:
I got you
Shit h h i i t t
Just had to wrap it in triple backticks, or prefix each line with four spaces. Is that what you wanted?
S SH SHI SHIT HIT IT T
This was really hard to do on phone lol.
- Comment on X plans to show ads in Grok chatbot's answers 2 days ago:
I’m pretty sure 0 people use it is my thinking
- Comment on X plans to show ads in Grok chatbot's answers 2 days ago:
Sh3t
- Comment on X plans to show ads in Grok chatbot's answers 2 days ago:
I think it’s because they’re still trying to get people locked in, or at least feeling like they can’t operate without it.
Twitter must just be more desperate for cash.
- Comment on X plans to show ads in Grok chatbot's answers 2 days ago:
Now you’re getting it
- Comment on X plans to show ads in Grok chatbot's answers 2 days ago:
Shiiit
- Comment on If CEOs think they can replace everyone with AI, why do they think Wall St. will need CEOs? 2 days ago:
It’s actually incredible what bullshit masters they are. I consider myself a pretty smart, resolved person, but listening to some of these CEOs speak leaves me feeling confused, deflated, and demoralised.
- Comment on If CEOs think they can replace everyone with AI, why do they think Wall St. will need CEOs? 2 days ago:
Exactly. I’m sure countless accountants have pointed to that line item before and somehow we still have a CEOs.
People who are so wowed by the incredible generative output of LLMs and can’t wait for them to fix things need to realise this technology is not for them.
Like all nee tech it may cause a slight shakeup in the beginning allowing for a little upward mobility, but eventually big business folds around it until it only works for the owners.
We’ll all just be working more for less, unless something actually changes.
- Comment on If CEOs think they can replace everyone with AI, why do they think Wall St. will need CEOs? 2 days ago:
Yes people love a competent seeming authority. In this way the opaque nature of AI becomes a feature rather than a weakness. It just has to seem correct enough and sound authoritative to fulfill that need.
Some people want AIs to usher in a new age of prosperity.
I get the feeling that many of us (including myself at times) nurture this notion* that we’re waiting for the “adults” to arrive and save us from what a horrible mess we’ve made because we’re o so awful and can’t have nice things… blah blah bling blah… and so this line of thinking goes.
Anyway, to the sizeable number of people who feel this way it must feel like such a relief that, o finally daddy’s home, and I can stop worrying all the time. When ofc in reality, at best, the LLMs only have the same data we already have, and no AI-informed decisions will ever be followed unless it’s what their owners (as in rich fucks) wanted to do anyway.
Great comment by the way. If you say it was written with AI I may just tear out the last remnants of my hairline lol.
* kind of proto-fascist thinking tbh.
- Comment on If CEOs think they can replace everyone with AI, why do they think Wall St. will need CEOs? 2 days ago:
Just reread Brave New World, and you’re spot on. I forgot how consumerism underpinned everything in their society.
It was like a tightly regulated market but in the worst way.
- Comment on If CEOs think they can replace everyone with AI, why do they think Wall St. will need CEOs? 2 days ago:
We should’ve had that 50 years ago as an “automation tax” and 100 years ago as a “machine tax.”
All this tooling is just dead labour value that is used (by workers) to extract more and more value from workers and nature. We’ve been being robbed for hundreds of years.
- Comment on If CEOs think they can replace everyone with AI, why do they think Wall St. will need CEOs? 2 days ago:
Because it’s not about productivity. It’s about separating people into owners and toilers.
- Comment on Trump wanted a US-made iPhone. Apple gave him a gold statue. 2 days ago:
Honestly if the US actually had a left wing party that challenged the status quo, I’m sure he’s vapid enough that he might have tried to get his cult of personality going there.
I don’t think it would have gone well for him because he’s actually just a straight up shitty person, but I feel like for an obvious narcissist like him the party lines are just window dressing.
- Comment on Trump wanted a US-made iPhone. Apple gave him a gold statue. 2 days ago:
It works because the thing he really wants is validation, and they gave it to him. Now he’ll continue, and come back around their way again soon, I’m sure.
- Comment on Trump wanted a US-made iPhone. Apple gave him a gold statue. 2 days ago:
I can blame them. It sets a very dangerous precedent and tacitly legitimises the maga party’s bad behaviour.
- Comment on Need a keyboard with a dedicated "slop" button 4 days ago:
That specific use case is often brought up as an example of “good AI use” even among people who are opposed to the commercial models, so even if it was an apt comparison, I don’t think your assertion holds much water.
Further, aren’t you assuming my context if you think, for example, that I’m an ignorant hater because I’m hating on some gen AI web comic? Or nebulous defense of AI, like in the op?
Is this exchange one of the data points you mentally tally when you think of contextless, knee jerk reactions to all uses of AI? Because in this case right here, you would clearly be wrong.
I’m not against all ML/AI when applied in the right context.
- Comment on Need a keyboard with a dedicated "slop" button 4 days ago:
I think you’re assuming people are having a knee jerk, ignorant response, because you have come to a different conclusion than they have.
My dislike of consumer AI is very well informed. I’ve built my own local models and used generative AI extensively for work (no choice). I was actually pretty excited for the technology before the corps started using it as their latest accelerationist cudgel in the class war.
As it stands, I think it’s hard to justify using AI, even as a casual consumer. For many reasons that are already well documented.
- Comment on Microsoft CFO calls for 'intensity' in an internal memo, after blowout earnings 5 days ago:
I prefer emphasis, highlighting, and italics execution.
- Comment on Microsoft CFO calls for 'intensity' in an internal memo, after blowout earnings 5 days ago:
Ah so it’s the classic “but my hands are forced to do the machine’s bidding” then goes on to do the thing they really wanted to do while their hollow appeal to authority is still echoing.
I believe it’s one of the things corpos love about AI so much - it can be used as a stochastic authority to excuse their behaviour. And if they don’t like what it extrudes? Well they can just shake up the inputs and run it again, until they get what they want.
- Comment on Need a keyboard with a dedicated "slop" button 5 days ago:
The comparison is bunk though.
The awareness of systemic oppression is not equivalent to a technology that produces text and images of dubious provenance.
- Comment on Cutting sucks 5 days ago:
Also username
- Comment on Cutting sucks 5 days ago:
Seriously. And you will very quickly get used to it. Like you wouldn’t believe what happened to me when I started making red lentil dal on the regular, but after a while, my bowel movements went back to regular and no more “ring of fire.”
- Comment on There are too many cases where this applies or is going to apply 6 days ago:
Nazis. I hate these guys.
- Comment on There are too many cases where this applies or is going to apply 6 days ago:
I don’t understand your comment. What is a ngmi? It looks like an acronym for “not gonna make it”
- Comment on heaven 6 days ago:
What’s hilarious is I actually have that shirt
- Comment on Peter Thiel’s bestie going mask off 1 week ago:
Never really thought of narcissisms in such a plural and mundane way. Is this a school of abnormal psychology or something?
Interesting lens to look through. I’ve always been a sucker for this kind of transactional analysis.
- Comment on Peter Thiel’s bestie going mask off 1 week ago:
Fascinating. I never understood why the cuckolding fetish (fixation? obsession?) came with such a strong overlap with, I guess, race play? Feels like a charitable way to put it.
I didn’t believe it at first, but any quick web search will show that cuckolding largely is about the races of the people involved.
Which makes a lot more sense if seen through the framework you just described.