LustyArgonianMana
@LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
Dominatrix in the PNW
- Comment on X.com blocks access to Ekrem Imamoglu, leader of Turkish opposition 1 week ago:
What content broke the laws? Can you give more info? BlueSky has been pretty good so far so this surprises me
- Comment on Are We All Becoming More Hostile Online? 1 week ago:
Yeah, there are a lot of men on here who really go to bat for pedophilia. Don’t even BREATHE a word about AI porn of children being immoral because it is modeled after irl children and can be made to blackmail kids etc. Don’t ever argue with any Muslim misogynists on here that child marriage is bad or that feminism in Islam is good. Never be upset that a man was saying it is “probably” not good for kids if they participate in sex acts (we have specific physiological signs like bedwetting that show CSA is inherently damaging to humans) but that it should be totally normal to have your kids WATCH you fuck because they probably did that in medieval times.
And people wonder why my bio recommends BlueSky
- Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations. 1 week ago:
Then you lose. I accept you quit and lost. Bye.
- Comment on Are We All Becoming More Hostile Online? 1 week ago:
BlueSky is genuinely one of the least toxic socials I’ve had in a while. I can agree to disagree there on normal issues like whether UBI should be given in a lump sum, weekly, monthly- it’s not fucking assholes “debating” if aliens built the pyramids and whether we should drink our own pee or if good faith arguments are important or if it’s “natural” to be attracted to 14yr old girls as an adult man (all topics I’ve seen on Lemmy).
- Comment on Are We All Becoming More Hostile Online? 1 week ago:
Theres so much pedophilia, wanton violence, racism, misogyny, honophobia… fuck all these people. May they never find peace or happiness. We owe no one politeness.
- Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations. 1 week ago:
Yes, you do need to provide evidence for your claims. I’ve provided evidence and explained my position, and your position has been fallacies and ad homs. That’s not a valid refutation. That you need this explained to you is … Lol
your fallacy is the fallacy fallacy
That’s not how fallacies work lol. You have to specifically outline what part of speech is using fallacious arguments. It’s not “my” fallacy lol
That’s also not how the fallacy fallacy works in argument, because it 1) shows you admit you have argued in bad faith and 2) goes back to arguing in good faith because that is what is considered reasonable, that is, able to be reasoned with, and not nonsense.
Again, that you need this explained to you is lol
May you end up in court some day, please 🙏
- Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations. 1 week ago:
Lol, I don’t cause you to argue in bad faith (with entire comments full of fallacies), that’s you who does so of your own brainpower.
You’ve not once made a valid counterargument or even provided evidence. What evidence? The only content I’ve seen is your ableism and ad hominems. Can you actually form an independent, good faith argument backed with valid evidence? I haven’t seen evidence of THAT being able to happen yet.
- Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations. 1 week ago:
Normally I would just mock you by pointing out that liberals stay in the tweets while leftists get out on the streets, but you’re obviously suffering from mental illness
Here’s an ad hominem and ableism. Your refusal to debate the argument here is a fallacy and bad faith.
and I don’t think it’s very nice to make fun of people who are clearly having a mental breakdown, judging by your totally normal reaction.
2nd instance of ad hom and ableism in this comment alone.
As for BRICS,
Thanks for reminding me you failed to answer any questions and lost this devate completely.
Also, hey @antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com, turns out it’s uh checks notes BRICS that’s censoring Wikipedia to convince you not to drink your own pee.
Strawman, that was never said. I also have a longform comment to that user already explaining why the science of the pee drinking stuff is bogus, so somehow you did a double strawman.
Yup, bunch of totally normal people in these comments.
3rd instance of ad hom and ableism
Now for this comment.
you’re very clearly dedicated to whatever this wonderful and deep narrative is that you’ve crafted
That’s literally just having integrity and debating a position. You can’t argue because you don’t know how to argue this topic in good faith and apparently too childish to admit it.
and also, argonians have stinky fish breath
This is an ad hom, and further, you are basing the entirety of your refusal to discuss in good faith on ad homs in the previous comment.
you’re wrong, because your arguments suck
This is also a fallacy and bad faith argument, it would be dismissed. Circular reasoning.
An ad hominem is an attempt to refute an argument by using a personal attack
That’s what you did. Literally.
Oh, and if you’re going to call someone a nazi, at least make it someone the average person would believe is a nazi
You are one or you support them which makes you one.
If I was anything of the sort, I personally know three admins of my instance who would not hesitate to ban me in an instant, and one or two of them could probably dox me if they wanted to.
Really bad application of appeal to authority - fallacy. Lemmy mods dont determine who is a Nazi lol
- Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations. 2 weeks ago:
Strawman, literally no one said that.
- Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations. 2 weeks ago:
LOL
- Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations. 2 weeks ago:
Chat GPT reduces critical thinking, because it can loterally “think” for people. If someone isn’t a critical thinker, it’s not that they consume Wikipedia, it’s that they lack critical thinking skills. They will approach ANY TOPIC or writing the same, because they aren’t a critical thinker. Wikipedia is great and doesnt reduce critical thinking.
- Comment on YSK: Regulations don't exist because governments like them... 2 weeks ago:
No, we aren’t- the current solar maximum while we have record heat and while the ozone is diminishing means we have mass death speeding up.
space.com/…/wonky-row-crops-and-possessed-tractor…
This is actually worse than you realize, because normally the solar maximum in the past DID mean peak crop yields and more food for animals and people. So much so a farmer in the 1800s predicted much of the stock market peak and troughs based on the solar cycle.
therationalinvestor.com/…/how-the-benner-cycle-pr…
So we should actually be at a food surplus but climate change etc is so bad (we are past 7 of 9 boundaries to live on earth) that we are dying and animals are dying. Mass, MASS deaths of insects and birds and sea life. We probably don’t have enough food worldwide any more, not this year at least.
- Comment on YSK: Regulations don't exist because governments like them... 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on YSK: Regulations don't exist because governments like them... 2 weeks ago:
That’s cellulose, not sawdust, and it’s added to this day in all sprinkle cheeses so they dont stick together. Cellulose isn’t a problem to eat. Sawdust is.
- Comment on YSK: Regulations don't exist because governments like them... 2 weeks ago:
Also, and this is a spicy one but backed by basic economics, regulations are a required element to capitalism
Indeed the free market itself has demanded regulations. This is a free market, it has regulations because it is what was needed.
- Comment on YSK: Regulations don't exist because governments like them... 2 weeks ago:
Business and government do different things. The government is like the brain of the body, it receives info and dispatches messages to various areas to have the body respond.
The economy is our blood, it literally transfers resources like food to various areas of the body.
They do different functions. They do different things. How can you run a brain/nervous system like a circulatory/blood system? They are different and for different things.
Further with this analogy, the peripheral nerves are like our communications systems, the lymph is like the military combined with 501cs (mix of attacking and helpful resources, eg vitamins in chylomicrons). And the people are all the individual cells, do their best in their specialized roles and communicating with the brain what needs they have so the brain can dispatch or change things to keep everything running well in homeostasis.
A group of cells (like a business) who demands too many resources/blood supply will kill other cells. It can be hard for the brain to figure out why cells are dying and may attack the wrong cells to correct it, and give resources to the wrong cells. This is how the US has started to die.
- Comment on YSK: Regulations don't exist because governments like them... 2 weeks ago:
You don’t own your land like that, you basically rent it from the government for the price of property taxes, and because you do it that way, you get better protections and deals and things you can do for your “ownership” than a typical tenant.
Whatever you put in the ground, including mercury for gold mining, has broad impacts and we should indeed regulate that for everyone. No one wants mercury in their well water.
Idk what’s going on with your mom/her county, but usually structures like that just mean the property isn’t able to get financing. What specifically is their issue with her sheds? I’ve never heard of such a thing, even for partially collapsed barns, unless they live in a HOA. And further, why would she pay the COUNTY anything? Are they building it?
- Comment on YSK: Regulations don't exist because governments like them... 2 weeks ago:
Corporations wont let us have Medicare for All - why? Why do they ALL lobby so hard against it? It would make their costs cheaper, right? They wouldn’t have to pay for our health insurance. Plus we could get medicines so we can be at work more instead of home sick or spreading sickness at work. So it must not be cheaper in some way for them to have Medicare for All - right? Why do they think it would be more expensive for THEM if we all had public health care?
Because that would detect cancer (and toxins) and allow us to class action sue companies for them. Can’t sue if it was never detected. Thats why they find carcinogens and lead in kids’ products so much - their products dont have more lead in them, but kids all can be on Medicaid and that catches it. Flint, MI, water poisoning was detected by a kid on Medicaid.
They don’t want us to all have healthcare because that is public science and it will absolutely detect what theyve been lying and poisoning us with. It would probably destroy all the big companies like Nestle, Johnson&Johnson, Colgate, etc…
- Comment on YSK: Regulations don't exist because governments like them... 2 weeks ago:
Corporations wont let us have Medicare for All - why? Why do they ALL lobby so hard against it? It would make their costs cheaper, right? They don’t have to pay for our health insurance. Plus we could get medicines so we can be at work more instead of home sick or spreading sickness at work. So it must not be cheaper in some way for them to have Medicare for All - right? Why do they think it would be more expensive for THEM if we all had punlci health care?
Because that would detect cancer (and toxins) and allow us to class action sue companies for them. Can’t sue if it was never detected. Thats why they find carcinogens and lead in kids’ products so much - their products dont have more lead in them, but kids all can be on Medicaid and that catches it. Flint, MI, water poisoning was detected by a kid on Medicaid.
- Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations. 2 weeks ago:
Not all physical books are accessible, eg the log books of Christopher Columbus. DOGE is defunding libraries and Dept of Ed. Academics are fleeing. This collapse of knowledge is bad.
- Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations. 2 weeks ago:
Yes, and Musk this year said he would defund and potentially disband (for being “terrorist orgs”) any nonprofit he didnt like. He was kind of meaning the ACLU at the time but it includes Wikipedia too potentially for the disbanding part
- Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations. 2 weeks ago:
In a recent post, I tried to introduce a conceptual tool which I (as humorously and self-deprecatingly as possible) named after myself. In brief, “The Kory Scale” (TKS) is based on the hypothesis that the more a new or existing medical therapy is attacked in a coordinated, sustained fashion by the medical establishment and media, the more likely the treatment is both highly effective and safe.
Okay, starting off with a made up fallacy is always a bad sign in science FYI… And so is going off that bad fallacy with more fallacies for 10 paragraphs.
Before I go further, I just want to celebrate that “there is a new Sheriff in town,” given my friend and colleague RFK Jr. is now the Secretary of Health and Human Services
LOL of course, that actually is pretty consistent w your pyramid conspiracies
Although I am not a criminologist, my understanding from movies and news reports
LOL
Let’s just move on to the claims you’re making:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burzynski_Clinic
The compounds are not licensed as drugs but are instead sold and administered as part of clinical trials at the Burzynski Clinic and the Burzynski Research Institute.
Burzynski has since produced the compounds synthetically.
The Burzynski Clinic is a clinic selling an unproven cancer treatment, which has been characterized as harmful quackery.[1] It was founded in 1976 and is located in Houston, Texas, in the United States. It offers a form of chemotherapy originally called “antineoplaston therapy” devised by the clinic’s founder Stanislaw Burzynski in the 1970s. Antineoplaston is Burzynski’s term for a group of urine-derived peptides, peptide derivatives, and mixtures. There is no accepted scientific evidence of benefit from antineoplaston combinations for various diseases, and the Clinic’s claimed successes have not been replicated by independent researchers.
The clinic has been the focus of criticism primarily due to the way its antineoplaston therapy is promoted, the costs for people with cancer participating in trials of antineoplastons and problems with the way these trials are run. Legal cases have been brought as a result of the sale of the therapy without regulatory approval.
Burzynski is also the president and founder of a pharmaceutical company, the Burzynski Research Institute, which manufactures his antineoplaston drugs.
See the last line? Now tell me, how is he not ALSO PART of the Turf war your article is talking about?
Reviewers of his scientific papers have disputed the design of the trials and scientific validity of the published results.[12][13][14]
In February 2017, following lengthy hearings, the Texas Medical Board recommended Burzynski’s medical license be revoked, with the revocation suspended,[clarification needed] and a fine of $360,000 for billing irregularities and other violations.
So it’s not just Wikipedia against him, but also medical boards. SO again, no issue with Wikipedia here, or science, he just is grifting people and you dont get what science even is (hint: it’s reproducible results).
From A-10, antineoplaston AS2-1 was derived – a 4:1 mixture of phenylacetic acid and phenylacetylglutamine.[25] The Burzynski Clinic website states that the active ingredient of antineoplaston A10-I is phenylacetylglutamine
So we know what it is, and it can indeed be synthesized (how else would the body make it, lol).
Further, you don’t always need a placebo for studies, you need a CONTROL group. Often the control group is given a placebo, but in this case, they could use other chemotherapy treatment as a control. They dont want to be more legitimate though, because their patients’ and their families would have better standing to sue them for lying/false advertising/snake oil. So no, it wasnt rejected for not having a placebo group and being too ethical to give cancer patients a placebo LOL
From 1991 to 1995, the NCI initiated multiple phase II trials of antineoplastons. In 1995, after over $1 million had been spent on these trials, they were stopped due to fundamental conflicts between NCI investigators and Burzynski and his employees, notably around Burzynski’s insistence on approving all protocols in the NCI trial.
The largest trial Burzynski registered was called CAN-1 and aimed to cover all clinic patients at that time. Jaffe wrote that CAN-1 was “a joke” of a clinical trial and explained the legal maneuvering:
The CAN-1 protocol had almost two hundred patients in it and there were at least a dozen different types of cancers being treated. And since all the patients were already on treatment, there could not be any possibility of meaningful data coming out of the so-called clinical trial. It was all an artifice, a vehicle we and the FDA created to legally give the patients Burzynski’s treatment. The FDA wanted all of Burzynski’s patients to be on an IND [Investigational New Drug (IND) Application], so that’s what we did.
The consensus among the professional community, as represented by the American Cancer Society[33] and Cancer Research UK[34] is that antineoplaston therapy is unproven, and the overall probability of the treatment turning out to be as claimed is low due to lack of credible mechanisms and the poor state of research after more than 35 years of investigation. Antineoplaston treatments have significant known side effects including severe neurotoxicity. Hypernatremia is also a significant risk given the high levels of sodium in antineoplaston infusions.
Gee, I dont think Wikipedia is the issue lol my word
- Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations. 2 weeks ago:
Yeah, I get what kind of guy you are now.
Everyone itt note: this guy is against Wikipedia and thinks these things. This is EXACTLY WHY we need Wikipedia. He would literally be smarter if he had never used social media and had only used Wikipedia random article generator.
- Comment on After they kill Wikipedia history will be AI hallucinations. 2 weeks ago:
It is a modern library of Alexandria, free to all globally and community built. It’s genuinely an amazing surviving piece of the old internet. No one is saying it’s the only place, but it is vitally important and a huge deal if it goes away. Shame on you for downplaying that.
- Comment on European police say KidFlix, "one of the largest pedophile platforms in the world," busted in joint operation. 5 weeks ago:
No, I am not saying that.
I’m saying if an AI image is sexual and seeded from irl child models, then it is CSAM.
Adult women who consensually post their image to social media are WAY different than children who can’t consent to even enter a contract.
Also, I did argue that already when I mentioned how many AI porn models are directly seeded from Scarlett Johansson’s face. Can you read?
- Comment on The US Secretary of Education referred to AI as ‘A1,’ like the steak sauce 5 weeks ago:
It’s the root of their issues, I firmly believe this. We must fight fascism with free, consensual love and sex ✌️
- Comment on The US Secretary of Education referred to AI as ‘A1,’ like the steak sauce 5 weeks ago:
Oof, that curse is going to bite you back hard, I’d be careful how you treat others moving forward
- Comment on The US Secretary of Education referred to AI as ‘A1,’ like the steak sauce 5 weeks ago:
Trying to squirm out of your curse, huh? Won’t work. You literally have to prevent the US from having a full out civil war in order to stop it. Whether I can read is irrelevant, it’s whether I can curse someone that matters, and I did that perfectly here. May you always be treated as you treat others.
- Comment on The US Secretary of Education referred to AI as ‘A1,’ like the steak sauce 5 weeks ago:
…the entire subject of this thread is about her, so it indeed DOES make sense that readers here would have that context lol.
It doesn’t cost more than 1/20th of a calorie for you to ask for context, and voila, I gave it to you. You have that link now.
Saying “no need to kink shame,” implies you don’t need more context or a link and that you understand and accept what McMahon did, because you came to her defense right away. You’d have to give some kind of indication that you didn’t know the context for me to understand that, at that point. Obviously. Please, get checked for a stroke ASAP. I’m concerned.
I cursed you with a civil war, since that’s what you want so bad for others, not an attack from the US. Learn to read. Get checked for strokes.
- Comment on European police say KidFlix, "one of the largest pedophile platforms in the world," busted in joint operation. 5 weeks ago:
Yes, it is seeded with kids’ faces, including specific children like someone’s classmate. And yes, those children, all of them, who it uses as a reference to make a generic kid face, are all being abused because it’s literally using their likeness to make CSAM. That’s quite obvious.
It would be different if the AI was seeding models from cartoons, but it’s from real images.