Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

USA 🇺🇸 USA 🇺🇸 USA

⁨1481⁊ ⁨likes⁊

Submitted ⁨⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago⁊ by ⁨fossilesque@mander.xyz⁊ to ⁨science_memes@mander.xyz⁊

https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/18e024cb-d1be-4706-9f30-749b2bbf389a.jpeg

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Okay, but the ruling is totally sensible inasmuch as it applies to “purposes of tariffs, imports and customs”. Tomatoes by and large aren’t being imported for their botanical value; they’re being used for food. This ruling exists so corporations can’t “um ackshually” their way out of paying their fair share.

    But that’s too sensinle; in reality, this unanimous ruling that I never bothered to spend five seconds researching independently (I am very intellectually superior) was just “le Americans uneducated ecksdee”.

    source
    • oo1@lemmings.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      ‘Fruit de la mere’ is obviously just some attempted tax dodge.

      source
      • BenVimes@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Assuming you were aiming for the French phrase for ‘seafood’, I think you meant ‘fruit de mer.’

        ‘Fruit de la mere’ would translate to, ‘fruit of the mother.’

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Kaput@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Or maybe dodging the no meat Friday of the Catholic Church. ?

        source
  • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Fruit the botanical term and fruit the culinary term are just not the same word. Similarly to how theory means something different in science and in colloquial speech. That’s just how language works.

    source
    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      More people ought to learn about the programming language concept of namespaces. Generalize from that and you realize that every domain of discourse has its own namespace of words that have different meanings from those same words outside the domain.

      My favourite is math which has loads of wonderfully generic-sounding terms such as rational, irrational, radical, real, imaginary, complex, group, ring, field, category, set, operator, element, and unit which all have radically different meanings from the everyday senses of those words.

      source
      • jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Yes, but then where would we be without all those endless squabbles about X which are easily solved by pointing out that A::X != B::X?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        I like this.

        Kids are already taught to look for “context clues”

        Namespacing would require the author explicitly define the namespace.

        I would also add versioning as a year/month and localization.

        source
      • SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        I always thought it was more like overloading, but namespaces are also a good analogy.

        source
  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Botanically, there’s no such thing as a vegetable.

    That’s a culinary term, which seems to cover some fruits, some plant roots, some plant stems, some plant leaves, and some plant flowers.While culinary fruits are the other botanical fruits, and a few flowers (figs are weird)

    source
    • Enekk@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      The legal decision is important for a slew of reasons including taxation, SNAP benefits, etc. The decision was less about science and more about the reality of how tomatoes are used in our society.

      source
      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        … Cool? I was more pointing out the issues with the assumptions the meme was making

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      Now I get why some (a ?) states declared pizza a veggie or something like that? Like if vegetable is a culinary term it makes sense you could classify pizza as a vegetable. But like, why the fuck is law declaring what anything is culinary?

      source
      • ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        To get around legal requirements to include vegetables in school lunches

        source
      • frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Speculating here, but taxes are one reason.

        Almost all the rules about what counts as wine, beer, whiskey, etc. comes from some country making definitions for tax purposes.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Because those culinary definitions are used for other laws, e.g. laws about what food schools can give to children.

        source
    • bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨5⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      Consider that in German (and probably a ton of other languages too), there are just two different words for the botanical and the culinary definition of fruit, so you can have namespacing built in to the language

      source
  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Botanically, sure, but from a culinary perspective they’re used like a vegetable.

    source
    • just2look@lemmy.zip ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      I don’t think vegetable is a botanical term. So fruit and vegetable aren’t really mutually exclusive.

      source
      • princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Yeah I mean, mushrooms get lumped into the vegetable category most of the time and they’re a fungus!

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • jaybone@lemmy.zip ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        If my grandmother had wheels, she would be a bicycle. But she would also be my grandmother.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Gyroplast@pawb.social ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      That’s just science as applied by engineers.

      source
    • Valmond@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      As they say, intelligence is knowing tomato is a fruit, wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.

      (That’s the saying, but IMO it’s wisdom to know and intelligence to not do it, maybe I’m mixing things up).

      source
      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        From Dungeon Crawler Carl:

        I grumbled a bit about that three in intelligence. Yeah, I never did too great in math, but I never considered myself a slobbering idiot, either. I could fix most anything electrical after studying it for a bit. My friend Billy Maloney, now that guy was an idiot. Just last week we’d come out of a bar, and he’d peed right on a cop’s bicycle while the cop was giving someone else a ticket for drunk and disorderly. That guy deserved an intelligence of three, maybe two.

        . . .

        After I complained about my intelligence score to Mordecai, using the Billy example, he said, “Intelligence told you that bike belonged to a police officer. Wisdom told you not to urinate upon it.

        source
      • gofsckyourself@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Yeah, it seems you’ve heard a version adapted to explain the different D&D stats.

        source
      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Knowledge and wisdom is the one I’ve heard before.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • PapaCabbage@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Vegetables do not exist. Well, they exist as a culinary thing. There’s just no scientific/botanical definition of what makes something a vegetable.

    source
    • kameecoding@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      What about Stephen Hawking?

      source
      • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Stephen Hawking is a pile of ash, not a vegetable.

        source
      • buttnugget@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        What about him?

        source
    • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      I appreciate the message, but I find this presentation style to be unbearable, like a shitty clickbait version of a TED talk: fast cuts with exaggerated audience reactions, playing hide the ball with the actual information being presented. And then they took what I imagine is a normal studio production designed for normal TV screens and cropped it into vertical video, published on Youtube as a short. Gross.

      source
      • melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Tbf it’s a comedy show, it being informative is mostly a bonus. This one is rare for being factual and not about why we should nuke the moon or which cartoon characters are invited to the cookout or something like that.

        source
  • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    This is dumb, botanically tomatoes are a fruit doesn’t preclude them being vegetables because vegetable isn’t a botanical term at all. Tomatoes are fairly sweet but they have more culinarily in common with vegetables. Nutritionally I’m not positive but it’s a separate issue.

    Regardless the supreme court decision was regarding tariffs/imports/customs which makes sense to classify it simply by the way in which people consume it. People eat tomatoes as a vegetable, just like we eat zucchini and cucumber as vegetables despite them all also being fruit.

    source
    • Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      Pretty sure it’s so giving ketchup to school kids constitutes a serving of vegetables.

      source
      • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨5⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        No that was 90 years later as school budgets were cut further and further until they were using things like pickle relish as a required vegetable. Our public school system is an embarrassment.

        source
  • homura1650@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    I’m going to take this as an opportunity to point out that bees are a type of fish in California.

    source
    • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      You weren’t kidding!

      California enforces many wildlife regulations. CESA, or the California Endangered Species Act, is designed to keep animal and plant life from extinction. The law covers any threatened “bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant.”

      Insects weren’t mentioned in the specific act’s wording. However, a separate California regulation legally defines fish as “a wild fish, mollusk, crustacean, invertebrate, amphibian, or part, spawn, or ovum of any of those animals.”
      So, are bees actually fish? Yes, because all invertebrates are according to California law. The broad definition of fish allows activists to fight for insect survival.
      The California Department of Fish and Wildlife has clarified that “It was not believed necessary to include the term invertebrate in the original legislation because ‘fish’ is defined in the Fish and Game Code to include ‘invertebrates’…”

      Talk about by-the-book!

      source
      • Hupf@feddit.org ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        sciencealert.com/actually-there-is-no-such-thing-…

        source
    • buttnugget@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      Good.

      source
  • WILSOOON@programming.dev ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Fun fact, the vatican classifies capybaras as fish

    source
    • Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      For lent-related purposes, I presume? Same as beavers.

      source
    • starlinguk@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      Squirrels too.

      source
      • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        TIL the vatican approves of squirrel stew on fridays.

        source
    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      Either we’re all fish, whales and dolphins are fish, or nothing is fish. All three positions are perfectly justifiable depending on your critieria, so take your pick.

      source
    • cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      Crazy

      iflscience.com/for-hundreds-of-years-the-vatican-…

      source
  • merc@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Strange times for Berry Club

    From Mr. Lovenstein whose website unfortunately doesn’t seem to work, except to redirect you to Meta-owned socials. Ugh.

    source
    • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      Aren’t strawberries nuts?

      source
      • merc@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Yeah man, they’re completely nuts!

        source
  • woodenghost@hexbear.net ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Yes, fruit is a botanical category, but vegetable is not.

    source
  • Kolanaki@pawb.social ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    All fruits are vegetables, but not a vegetables are fruit.

    Vegetable = any edible plant part.

    Fruit = Ovary of a flowering plant that carries the seeds.

    source
  • foggianism@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    I remember watching a YT video once about a legislative move of a US county to declare the number Pi to be exactly 3.

    source
    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      *State. It was Indiana. * 3.2.

      www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFNjA9LOPsg – How Pi was nearly changed to 3.2 - Numberphile

      source
  • vane@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Not unique because EU also classifies tomatoes as vegetables.

    Is the tomato a fruit or a vegetable?
    The classification of fruit and vegetables can be based
    on various approaches — botanical, agronomical,
    culinary — thus resulting in different definitions. For
    example, the tomato is botanically a fruit, but it is
    commonly considered a vegetable from both the
    agronomical and the culinary points of view.
    The facts and figures presented in this briefing follow
    Eurostat’s definitions based on the farm management
    and agronomical practices, according to which the
    term ‘fresh vegetable’ refers to annual (or, rarely,
    biennial) horticultural crops, and the term ‘fruit’ refers
    to perennial crops.
    Following this approach, tomatoes are included in the
    main statistical aggregate of vegetables, as well as
    melons, water melons and strawberries, which are
    commonly considered and consumed as fruit.

    europarl.europa.eu/…/EPRS_BRI(2019)635563_EN.pdf

    source
  • Arfman@aussie.zone ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    And we laughed when some pope declared the capybara is a fish

    source
    • ilikecoffee@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      When… what? 😂

      source
      • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Capybara are fish, so are bees, because fish don’t actually exist.

        The levels of validity may vary, but everything I said there is true in one form or another.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    I wonder if in other romance languages is the same, in Spanish and Catalan the two definitions are distinguished by being masculine or feminine. Fruto/fruit being masculine is the botanical fruit and fruta/fruita is the culinary fruit.

    How is it in other romance languages?

    source
    • Railcar8095@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      Almost, but not quite. Fruto and fruta are not two genders of the same word, but two different words, with different sources words (fruto fructus and fruta fructa)

      Meanings are very similar, so there’s a lot of mixup.

      source
      • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        You’re completely right, they are two different words. For me that distinction was so clear that I never considered that what I wrote could be interpreted as two genders of the same word, that would make no sense.

        I didn’t know the origins though, cool.

        source
  • bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Is there even a botanical definition of vegetables?

    source
    • stray@pawb.social ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      No. What is or isn’t a vegetable is determined entirely by whether we collectively consider any given plant or plant part a food item.

      source
  • Zerush@lemmy.ml ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    They are vegetables

    source
    • friendlymessage@feddit.org ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      They are both, it’s not contradictory

      source
      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        This is because “vegetable” is purely a culinary term. There’s no botanical definition of a vegetable. Tomatoes are berries, which is a type of fruit, from a botanical standpoint. So are cucumbers. They’re both vegetables from a culinary standpoint. Lettuce is a leaf. Broccoli is a flower. Carrots are roots. Celery is a stalk. All vegetables culinarily.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • infuziSporg@hexbear.net ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Intelligence is knowing that a tomato is a fruit.

    Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.

    Distinction is inventing a fruit salad that a variety of tomato can fit into.

    source
    • lemmur@szmer.info ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      True wisdom

      source
  • einlander@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    So tomatoes are trans?

    source
  • sirico@feddit.uk ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Pizza is a salad according to your legal system

    source
    • PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space ⁨5⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      That’s a wrap.

      source
  • Kirsche_z@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago
    [deleted]
    source
    • Remavas@programming.dev ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      The Supreme Court was fully aware of the technical term:

      Botanically speaking, tomatoes are the fruit of a vine, just as are cucumbers, squashes, beans, and peas. But in the common language of the people, whether sellers or consumers of provisions, all these are vegetables which are grown in kitchen gardens, and which, whether eaten cooked or raw, are, like potatoes, carrots, parsnips, turnips, beets, cauliflower, cabbage, celery, and lettuce, usually served at dinner in, with, or after the soup, fish, or meats which constitute the principal part of the repast, and not, like fruits generally, as dessert.

      The attempt to class tomatoes as fruit is not unlike a recent attempt to class beans as seeds, of which Mr. Justice Bradley, speaking for this Court, said:

      “We do not see why they should be classified as seeds any more than walnuts should be so classified. Both are seeds, in the language of botany or natural history, but not in commerce nor in common parlance. On the other hand, in speaking generally of provisions, beans may well be included under the term ‘vegetables.’ As an article of food on our tables, whether baked or boiled, or forming the basis of soup, they are used as a vegetable, as well when ripe as when green. This is the principal use to which they are put. Beyond the common knowledge which we have on this subject, very little evidence is necessary or can be produced.”

      Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893)

      So this is how the Supreme Court could do this: they were fully aware but reasonably decided tariff laws should be based on ordinary meaning.

      source
  • TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    wow whoever made this post is SO smart

    source
  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Vibe judging.

    source
  • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    What about a bell pepper and an aubergine?

    source
    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

      aubergine

      Doesn’t exist in the US

      source
      • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

        Oh right, they call it eggplant. Right?

        source
  • Stern@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    en.wikipedia.org/…/Toy_Biz,_Inc._v._United_States

    Also the X-men aren’t human. Kinda makes the court system feel like the baddies tho

    source
  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world ⁨5⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    “There is nothing more American than shooting a man in this Walmart of a world.”

    source
  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    youtu.be/kpLd-Vi8qZA?t=18

    source
  • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Ketchup lobby in full swing

    source
  • Bloomcole@lemmy.world ⁨6⁊ ⁨days⁊ ago

    Americans don’t eat vegetables

    source
-> View More Comments