Most people […] write […] comments […] and hope AI picks them up
Really quite sad if there’s even one person out there doing that.
This is also as much of a grift as any SEO that claims to have cracked the code of getting to the top of results. Even if they have figured something reproducible, it will get fixed. If someone can manipulate a search engine to provide results different to what it would otherwise do, that’s a bug they will fix
AllzeitBereit@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
It’ll happen in the Fediverse too.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
People downvote me when I say it. That’s all cope. We’re not wrong; if and when this goes mainstream, it’ll attract the same bad actors just as heavily.
Of course, there are surely already a few here testing the waters.
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
I think there are some differences that make the fediverse more resilient to this. For example, the absence of cumulative account karma keeps out the reddit style karma farming. The ability to ban whole instances also makes it easier to kick out bad actors. Instance admins could also implement their own rules like switching to an invite based system to reduce bot spam. Also it seems to me that reddit is actively encouraging this kind behaviour to inflate their user statistics and there is no incentive to tolerate this kind of spam for a fediverse server admin.
Angelevo@feddit.nl 2 weeks ago
We are all rats. When this ship sinks, we will float to the next, or (decide to) drop off.
All things considered, how much would actually be lost?
The alternative being…
john_t@piefed.ee 2 weeks ago
There’s no algorithm to be played in the fediverse. The reward is too low for all the work of making a post visible, and it won’t carry to the next post, essentially starting all over again.
Goodeye8@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
I mean there’s nothing preventing them for doing the same thing here. But if we could get a more even split of users between instances it would arguably be harder for them to pull the same thing because a) the admins can intervene and ban those accounts because the admins are not corporate slaves, unless they are in which case b) other instances can just ban the instance that is letting corporations go wild. We’ve already seen that level of “moderation” with Lemmygrad being ostracized from the wider Lemmy/Piefed ecosystem.
It’s going to require more work from mods and admins, but I imagine we’ll fare better than Reddit. After-all Reddit has an incentive to support this kind of behavior.
Sl00k@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
I agree the Fediverse is not in a good spot for something like this.
I actually think this is where the identity system of atproto will be more impactful here as it allows a better verification system. I’ve been thinking lately you should be able to use hardware attestation + biometric attestation on apps to filter these emulated users out.
birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
And when that happens, we move instances.
rglullis@communick.news 2 weeks ago
If the idea of a healthy Fediverse requires people moving instances whenever one finds themselves close to bottom-feeders and opportunistic parasites, we already lost.
TheBat@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That’s discord model.
Fediverse needs to have a layer which traps AI in a never-ending maze.
rimu@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Yes PieFed has a setting for that. It makes scrapers give up pretty fast but ruins the experience for people without an account so I only use it on really bad days.
nutomic@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
Lemmy also has an admin setting like that. Additionally there will be private, federated communities available in version 1.0.
Drusas@fedia.io 2 weeks ago
That's how it's been on my mbin instance (fedia.io) for a while now.
deafboy@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Yes. If you can’t fight the death of the www, embrace it! Help making it happen!
/s
brendansimms@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Not if you use NORD VPN ™, fellow human. NORD VPN ™ guarantees filtering of astroturfing comments made by LLMs! Thats right - NORD VPN ™ does the following:
Findus@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
I’m looking for a network and/or internet with strong authentication which is open for unique human users only. Sure, bots could still use someone’s credentials but at least their scale & impact would be limited.
stickly@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Unless you completely ditch anonymity, this can only turn into a state captured propoganda platform. Whoever controls access/auth will have the keys to the content.
addie@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
If you’ve any suggestion on how to implement that, then it’s a million-dollar idea.
The “I’m a human” test that only takes a few seconds and then lets you do what you like for an hour was always vulnerable to ‘auth farms’. Pay some poor bastards in the third world a pittance to pass the test a thousand times an hour, let the bots run wild. And the bots have gained the ability to pass the tests themselves, at least by boiling the oceans in some datacentre while the VC money holds out.
Finding the people running the bots, fitting them with some very heavy boots and then seeing if they can swim in the deep ocean is probably needlessly cruel, but I’d be up for tarring and feathering a few. Once the videos got out, the rest might think harder about their life choices…
TWeaK@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
For it to happen in the Fediverse AI would have to be training on the Fediverse.
That’s what this post is about. Using reddit to plant comments that AI trains on, and subsequently getting AI to spit out your answer to questions it’s asked.
As such this can happen anywhere where AI is being trained. The issue is with how AI is training, not with how websites it trains on are being operated.
ultranaut@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
There isn’t really any reason to think the Fediverse won’t be used for AI training, if it isn’t already. Everything is in the open here, it’s easy enough to scrape all the data.
DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I know fediverse. Weds users and visibility but with all happening I wish it was disable to every crawler/bot
socsa@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
It’s one of the reasons I think public voting is a terrible idea. It’s a wet dream for hyper-targeted engagement farming. Even to the point it creates a bit of a nightmare scenario for spear phishing and malware injection. The stated “transparency” benefits just seem incredibly trivial compared to the risk, especially when actual malicious actors will simply spam bots and alts, while actual users must navigate this weirdly huge threat surface for basically no good reason.
UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Only thing stopping it now is that’s it’s not popular enough to be worth doing.
umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
yeah, i havent seen anyone come up with a solution so far.