chicken
@chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on IF YOU TAKE ENOUGH YOU CAN SEE *THE PATTERN* BRO 1 day ago:
Shit, it’s broken again, where’s the reset button?
- Comment on YSK about 15 bean soup. 1 day ago:
I eat beans basically as my main diet and don’t really soak or rinse them or anything, have no digestive issues from it.
- Comment on Meme. 4 days ago:
So what’s with everyone trying to lossify Saddam Husein all of a sudden?
- Comment on Microsoft doesn't understand the Fediverse 5 days ago:
I’m not assuming that, I just don’t see why would it even matter if it’s from another instance.
- Comment on Microsoft doesn't understand the Fediverse 6 days ago:
Is it a mistake? Wouldn’t federated content still count the same way legally, since an instance is also a website?
- Comment on UK Age Verification Data Confirms What Critics Always Predicted: Mass Migration To Sketchier Sites 6 days ago:
Except apparently it doesn’t even do a good job of that
To recap: compliant sites hemorrhaged users while non-compliant sites experienced massive growth.
Even if what’s really behind these laws is authoritarian conspiracy, hard to find a way to look at it that makes them seem competent.
- Comment on Can we please stop arguing about whether Bluesky is decentralized? 1 week ago:
What does that enable? Could people in states blocked by the main network use it through these?
- Comment on AI surveillance should be banned while there is still time. 1 week ago:
all the privacy debates surrounding Google search results from the past two decades apply one-for-one to AI chats, but to an even greater degree. That’s why we (at DuckDuckGo) started offering Duck.ai for protected chatbot conversations and optional, anonymous AI-assisted answers in our private search engine. In doing so, we’re demonstrating that privacy-respecting AI services are feasible.
I like and use DuckDuckGo but I don’t see how they can guarantee this, similar to how a VPN might claim to keep no logs but you can’t really know for sure.
I think it would be cool if there was software that downloads local copies of wikipedia, stackoverflow etc., and you can ask questions that will be responded to with relevant informative pages without that query going to a server.
- Comment on Blue Archive, [an anime RTS], got hacked, but the hacker just spawned the same character everywhere without touching valuable data, Nexon confirms - AUTOMATON WEST 1 week ago:
Seems like a stretch to call it an RTS
- Comment on If you argue for a cause like affordable housing for everyone, is it necessarily hypocritical if you also own investment properties? 1 week ago:
This is good logic but I think what you are missing is that the factor behind investment demand driving up price is volume of capital rather than number of landlords. One company can buy any number of living spaces if it has a way to profit on them, cancelling out the effects of any number of principled refusals by individuals to buy property in pursuit of that profit.
That said, one thing that is weighted to individuals is lobbying local government to protect their investments, so more people becoming landlords isn’t necessarily good, because your finances being tied to something is a powerful source of bias, for instance towards opposing new housing developments that could increase housing supply and reduce price of your properties, or opposing higher property taxes for non-primary-residences. But if someone supports effective policies towards affordable housing, even knowing it will harm their investments, I think they get credit for that.
- Comment on If you argue for a cause like affordable housing for everyone, is it necessarily hypocritical if you also own investment properties? 1 week ago:
Well like I said that’s kind of the sentiment I expect because people like to make this about individual morality, but care to elaborate at all? Do you disagree with any particular part of what I’m saying?
- Comment on If you argue for a cause like affordable housing for everyone, is it necessarily hypocritical if you also own investment properties? 1 week ago:
This will probably be an unpopular opinion but I think the reality is that the choice whether to be a landlord has no effect on the supply of housing and so is almost totally irrelevant to this essentially systemic issue. The only kind of stuff that matters here:
- Supply of housing influencing its cost
- Wealth of the poorest influencing their ability to pay for housing
- Other factors (the credit system etc) limiting people’s access to housing
- Legal ability to use housing as a speculative investment (ie. low property taxes even if you own multiple properties)
The idea that people would buy property and then provide housing on a charitable basis in defiance of the market isn’t realistic and isn’t a viable solution to the problem. The only solution is to build the right incentives into the system. Someone can support the latter without trying to do the former.
- Comment on YSK that hand sewing is a stupid cheap hobby to get into and reduces your impact on the environment 1 week ago:
I often do the opposite, pick a bright color that is not the color of the base material, to make the repair stand out more.
- Comment on (Rant) Don't buy Rockstar games. 2 weeks ago:
Oh, I see, didn’t read the second image at first
- Comment on Hypothetically, if you have memory problems and need to write down events, is there a system which you can verify that its not tampered with? (Like a digital checksum, but for a journal) 2 weeks ago:
Pull an eyelash or similar, keep it between a specific page and check every time that it’s still there. If someone tampers with the journal it will fall out and they won’t realize it matters.
- Comment on (Rant) Don't buy Rockstar games. 2 weeks ago:
Unfortunately email is the only way they have to verify your identity. No email, no account.
That isn’t really true, I’ve restored access to multiple game accounts before in situations where I lost access to my email, it mostly involved providing information about the account that only the person using it would know, like the names of characters on it and some other stuff. If a company can’t handle this it’s because they don’t want to pay for competent customer support workers and just rely entirely on automated systems.
- Comment on Mastodon says it doesn't 'have the means' to comply with age verification laws 2 weeks ago:
How can you know the success is zero? Encryption is more widely used and much more resistant to political attack. Open source software is more powerful and accessible. A large portion of people loathe corporate tech platforms at a level they didn’t years ago. Granted a lot of that is just down to how functional or trustworthy the software is, and what guarantees about it can be plausibly provided, and it isn’t all wins. Maybe you can’t exactly get everyone caring about this stuff in the same way or for the same reasons you do. But that doesn’t mean there are no possible avenues to success, or that the tech habits of other groups can be written off as useless here, because it’s probably the most important thing.
- Comment on bet you can think of more 2 weeks ago:
Yeah fair. I used to go to more stuff but a lot of it is the thought of getting covid freaks me out and I don’t live somewhere with a lot of meetup groups around anymore. Honestly I’ve always seen it as the other way, where irl spaces (especially ones that take money) are run by hostile or incompatible forces, and the internet as something with more exceptions to that, even now that it’s become worse.
- Comment on Mastodon says it doesn't 'have the means' to comply with age verification laws 2 weeks ago:
Also if wifi mesh is our last hope, oof
Yeah. What I propose is getting more people involved and caring about freedom preserving technologies before it gets to that point. A tiny minority of somewhat more tech literate people are not going to be magically immune to authoritarian checkmate scenarios.
- Comment on bet you can think of more 2 weeks ago:
I hear what you’re saying but I think I would probably never talk to anyone without the internet and be very less sane
- Comment on Mastodon says it doesn't 'have the means' to comply with age verification laws 2 weeks ago:
Are there now legal means to do longer range communications? I thought the main limitation was you need to be licensed to do anything more than short range home wifi
- Comment on Mastodon says it doesn't 'have the means' to comply with age verification laws 2 weeks ago:
Thanks. Somehow the network actually seems to be working pretty well for me now, not sure why it wasn’t before.
- Comment on Mississippi's age assurance law puts decentralized social networks to the test 2 weeks ago:
Unless these companies are hosted in MS, have offices, or sell ads there, there’s nothing legally they can do.
Is that really how it works? Haven’t legal challenges to these sorts of laws already been appealed up to the supreme court and they were upheld?
- Comment on Mastodon says it doesn't 'have the means' to comply with age verification laws 2 weeks ago:
I’ve tried a few times to check out i2p, it seems to take hours of leaving it running to even get to the point where you can very slowly and inconsistently load even the official pages though.
- Comment on Mastodon says it doesn't 'have the means' to comply with age verification laws 2 weeks ago:
So far their efforts in various forms of voter suppression have prevented that
- Comment on Mastodon says it doesn't 'have the means' to comply with age verification laws 2 weeks ago:
Except if the topic is wifi meshnets, no amount of tech savvyness will get you around an absence of other nodes nearby. General apathy is actually a huge problem here.
- Comment on Mississippi's age assurance law puts decentralized social networks to the test 2 weeks ago:
In those cases it seems like the law does prevent state level regulation of those things, because the state is only allowed to regulate commerce happening within its borders, not what its residents do elsewhere (although they can still also regulate the use of fireworks and airguns, but enforcement is more difficult, for instance where I am they sometimes send out notices in the mail warning that it’s against the law for individuals to be setting off fireworks but there’s always a massive decentralized fireworks show every 4th of July anyway).
Somehow with the internet, the location of the server isn’t the thing that matters, it’s whose computer is accessing it and where that person and computer is located, and the liability is on the server not the user. IMO it should not work that way.
- Comment on Microsoft fires two more employees for participating in Palestine protests on campus 2 weeks ago:
What a depressing comment section this article has
- Comment on Mississippi's age assurance law puts decentralized social networks to the test 2 weeks ago:
But the question is, what would be a reasonable legal principle for preventing such laws generally? Mississippi is going to pass bullshit laws, but it shouldn’t be possible for the jurisdiction of any state to be the entire internet.
- Comment on They didn't stop to think if they should 2 weeks ago:
tbf currently it looks like there is only one mildly AI negative comment, and the rest are joking about absurd anatomy.