Mulligrubs
@Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
- Comment on YSK: The US Government Assassinated MLK 2 days ago:
Check out the history of the FBI and the civil rights movement.
Who do you think informed the local cops?
“Discredit, disrupt, and destroy.” ~FBI. This is a federal organization (i.e. government).
- Comment on YSK: The US Government Assassinated MLK 2 days ago:
And remember, they abuse MLK today, even in death; he gets the vast majority of credit for the civil rights movement (with Parks), while the Black Panthers are totally left out of the narrative. At the time, they had a huge influence that sent a shudder throughout the suburbs.
Many civil rights protestors died, who knows how many were murdered by the state? The cops and feds colluded to kill a lot of people.
- Comment on All of a sudden he thinks that it's a spectacular plan. 3 days ago:
Because there is no opposing view from all of the evidence available.
You can choose to accept it, or say that they are liars and/or crazy.So why IMAGINE she was older? All from the time that we know of are in agreement (I know she’s referred to at least once in another Hadith, playing with dolls).
Yes, you can pretend you have some special insight, but you don’t. “You” describing anyone who might disagree.
For example, I have a memory of when I was a child. I know what happened, and nobody else does, or everybody else who did know is dead/absent. You will call me a liar?
Why pretend that I’m lying? You have no clue. There is no evidence of anything else happening.
That’s why it’s not a debate.
If you had evidence that she was whatever age, and other people who were there disagree? Well, then you can debate based on the merits and testimony of the witnesses. But as it is, she said she was young, others who were there said she was playing with dolls. Nobody from the time is saying “No, I was there, she was in her 30s”.
Does this mean all testimony is fact? No. But without evidence to the contrary, any other opinion is fantasy and conjecture.
So no debate.
- Comment on All of a sudden he thinks that it's a spectacular plan. 3 days ago:
Have you heard of The Epstein files?
It appears that a ton of his pedophile friends weren’t MAGA, and were in fact the wealthiest of “the left” and “the right”.
Why do you want to pretend otherwise? Deflection, probably.
- Comment on All of a sudden he thinks that it's a spectacular plan. 3 days ago:
Why does your country buy arms and goods from the USA and use the US Dollar in international trade?
It’s like people from your country don’t even care.
- Comment on All of a sudden he thinks that it's a spectacular plan. 3 days ago:
Judaism, Christianity, Muslim; all have a long history of enslaving, raping, and murdering, with centuries of evidence.
The worst part is they think they are justified and that they are good people.
We can’t abolish religion, that just gets them excited, they all love to be martyrs. So, tax them, like everybody else.
They can bitch about taxes and everyone else on Earth will be like “yeah it’s a bummer”. Why I have to finance their horror show is beyond me.
And remember, their tax benefits are far above and beyond what any non-profit charity gets.
- Comment on marriage update 3 days ago:
Tom gets it
- Comment on All of a sudden he thinks that it's a spectacular plan. 3 days ago:
Those “someone’s” are the only ones who knew. The reason to believe them is that there IS NO ONE ELSE offering an opposing view point from that time.
You either accept it as true, or reject it as untrue (in spite of knowing absolutely nothing).
No debate at all
- Comment on All of a sudden he thinks that it's a spectacular plan. 3 days ago:
That’s not what a debate is
People can choose not to accept anything, that doesn’t mean that it is debatable.
It’s factually wrong, according to the only source available. Do you understand?
- Comment on You're cured! 4 days ago:
You’re feisty and assertive, pretty good, but your analogies need work. Less guessing more facts
- Comment on All of a sudden he thinks that it's a spectacular plan. 4 days ago:
It’s not islamophobic, she was 9 years old
There’s no debate
Your claim is factophobic
- Comment on 5 days ago:
And then maaybe stop defaming her? Like, this post should be ban worthy by any reasonable instance and community rules?
Found the Reddit mod.
(pod person points and screams)
- Comment on YSK: The US massacred hundreds & raped children as young as 12 in one day. Only one perpetrator was convicted - later commuted by President Nixon. 5 days ago:
Democrats and Republicans want to murder each other NOW, they’re not even in the military. Why would GIs be any different?
In a civil war, all will be armed, the armed forces will split as they did before.
- Comment on YSK: The US massacred hundreds & raped children as young as 12 in one day. Only one perpetrator was convicted - later commuted by President Nixon. 5 days ago:
War and rape go hand in hand; you can’t dehumanize people and respect them simultaneously.
Not to mention that a lot of soldiers are amped up on drugs and/or alcohol. Many of them don’t want to even be there.
- Comment on Are Americans Actually Idiots? 5 days ago:
They’re good at holding office for decades until they are freaking 89 like Maxine Waters.
Coincidentally, she and her entire extended family have somehow become filthy rich. What a coincidence! So lucky!
- Comment on Are Americans Actually Idiots? 5 days ago:
Why vote for the pedophiles?
Vote Green, or Socialist, or Libertarian, or WHATEVER comes closest to what you think is right.
They say it’s only A or B because those are they options they have allowed you to have. But it’s not their call, and it’s not even their business. They don’t realize that third party votes influence the major parties (if they didn’t, it wouldn’t enrage them so much, now would it?).
Ds and Rs, worry about your own parties, get your own voters out. A lot of people hate both of you, and you’re going to have to let them go. You can’t force them to join your binary clown show.
The majority of voters are INDEPENDENTS (40%). Ds and Rs are now the minority (30% each). That’s what you get for ignoring voters for DECADES.
- Comment on YSK: Israel is ethnically cleansing Lebanon 5 days ago:
Many countries fought in the Iraq war, check it out!
- Comment on The Art of the Deal 5 days ago:
Now the French will learn that Trump never pays his bills, the check is in the mail so to speak
Oh, it’s not his money? I got nothing
- Comment on Don't be a coward 5 days ago:
Where I live, there are entire homeless encampments, like little villages of tents and tarps.
Fentanyl is said to be a big part of the problem. Meth was already a huge problem by itself.
So long story short drug war= heroin and cocaine scarcity= cheap quickly available chemical alternatives like meth and fentanyl= addiction spiral increase= poor and homeless= Windows can’t open a window without lagging. IT’S IN THE NAME YOU CAN’T EVEN DO IT
- Comment on Robots will solve wealth inequality, they say 5 days ago:
That’s a problem for another quarter, their priorities are profits NOW.
They don’t need an end game; let’s say everything you described as come to pass; they and their families will be on their islands and in underground bunkers with their piles of riches to recline upon (like a dragon), and we will be up top eating each other.
That’s their worst case scenario and they are fine with it, their robots will serve them for all eternity.
- Comment on Are Americans Actually Idiots? 5 days ago:
You will blame the third party vote, meanwhile, over half of those eligible to, don’t even vote, and you can’t even get your tens of millions of your own party members to vote.
It seems third party voters are the absolute least of your worries, but do go on with your mind numbing
- Comment on Are Americans Actually Idiots? 5 days ago:
Yes! Oddly, the rest of the world, all of those smarties over the globe, enable them, and even give them gobs of money.
I don’t get it. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
- Comment on Newest Testament: So Hot RN 5 days ago:
I see what you did there, HIGH FIVE
- Comment on Newest Testament: So Hot RN 5 days ago:
This cover is 100% approved by God, the Bible only says that Christ will butcher everybody on Earth upon His return, it does NOT explicitly say how; M60s and laser eyes riding a flying unicorn is perfectly sound theologically speaking.
- Comment on Robots will solve wealth inequality, they say 6 days ago:
CEOs and owners hate payroll, it’s their biggest “expense” and many would eliminate all employees the second they are able to.
The board would be very happy to have that expense removed; a perfect capitalist company needs no employees, just robots.
At least we’ll get to see the CEOs bitch, they’re quite an expense on their own and will also be replaced.
- Comment on YSK: Israel is ethnically cleansing Lebanon 6 days ago:
Yes, different “arms” of the military always, without exception, defend other branches of the military, allies, and their bases. They don’t all just sit in their own base and dig in, friend.
That would be stupid
You see, the aircraft carriers are big boats, and they hold these jets. The jets fly around in the air and shoot things with missiles and other arms. The important part for my point is that the carrier is MOBILE, and a place for the jets to land. So, of course we MOBILIZED our MOBILE base.
If an aircraft carrier is used, it is silly to conclude that the country that it is defending at the moment is more than a “military arm”. It’s used everywhere. Get it? That’s what it does.
I am not an expert, educate me if I am wrong.
- Comment on YSK: Israel is ethnically cleansing Lebanon 6 days ago:
Well you’re no longer discussing this in good faith once you start obfuscating a current genocide with shit that happened a hundred years ago, much less mythical shit that happened thousands of years ago.
You’re abusing the term “good faith” by refusing the fact that this was referred to as an act of “self-defense”, what I responded to.
Defense means they were attacked… which attack (of many) are you referring to? The response to October 7th?
Or October 7th?
Or before? Or after?
Can you answer the question, or are you, in bad faith, pretending that you can’t understand it? Or can you really not understand the question? Is that it?
- Comment on YSK: Israel is ethnically cleansing Lebanon 6 days ago:
You claim religions are toxic, but your anti-religiousness seems to make you quite angry and toxic.
My use of “your” was in response to “religions”, the topic of your last sentence.
The pronoun always refers to the last subject… which wasn’t you personally.
Also, please note that Muslim mosques don’t pay taxes, just like Catholic churches and Scientology and every other brand of religion; many more breaks than any non-profit.
It’s a religion, you see, so that’s what the fuck I am talking about. Your mosque should pay property taxes et al just like everybody else.
- Comment on YSK: Israel is ethnically cleansing Lebanon 6 days ago:
You’ve got it backwards, US and UK formed Israel after WW2, Israel is “our” testing ground and intelligence hub for the middle east. “Our” meaning USA, UK, Boeing, Northrop, General Dynamics, et al, and their respective owners.
- Comment on Elon Musk to Owe Billions After Jury Finds He Misled Twitter Investors Before Takeover 1 week ago:
So that’s like me paying a $20 fine. GOOD JOB