I should call her.
Submitted 3 days ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/c005bda4-c159-4bc8-83b4-eaf22b0c1e59.jpeg
Comments
Zacryon@feddit.org 3 days ago
_stranger_@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
how do we know this isn’t just a closeup of a tardigrade butthole?
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 days ago
They’re well studied.
Regna@lemmy.world 3 days ago
TIL
MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 3 days ago
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
That was a huge log
ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I clicked because of that hole but came here because of the tardigrade upskirt pics.
Nikls94@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Shit this made me actually laugh out loud in person lol 😂
vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 days ago
Hard to believe. To prepare a sample for an electron microscope you need to freeze it to nitrogen temperatures or below. You can fix it using glutaraldehyde, but again, you need to cut it accurately immediately after the penetration. My bet is that either stabbed dead skin or some sort of graphics.
MBech@feddit.dk 3 days ago
Also seems wildly overkill to use an electron microscope for this.
vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 days ago
That’s an elephant in the room here
flora_explora@beehaw.org 3 days ago
Yes! When I did electron microscopy, we had to cover the fix the samples and cover them with a very thin gold layer beforehand.
vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 days ago
Yeah, and it’s impossible to catch color!
alzymologist@sopuli.xyz 3 days ago
In rationalist hell there is a special teapot for people who color SEM images
Thordros@hexbear.net 3 days ago
Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 3 days ago
This is my hole. It was made for me.
leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
DRR… DRR… DRR…
Tikiporch@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Phineaz@feddit.org 3 days ago
Thanks, I hate it. Not because of the hole, but because of how unhealthy the skin looks in this picture.
cRazi_man@europe.pub 3 days ago
Were you expecting it to be smooth like plastic? The top layer is basically a bunch of dead skin cells that keep flaking away from the top layer and building up again from the lower layers.
sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 hours ago
Mmm, skin flakes.
kautau@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Not if you moisturize
^/s,^ ^of^ ^course,^ ^though^ ^I’m^ ^sure^ ^you^ ^could^ ^put^ ^this^ ^photo^ ^on^ ^Instagram^ ^and^ ^be^ ^like^ ^“this^ ^is^ ^your^ ^skin^ ^without^ ^my^ ^brand^ ^of^ ^healing^ ^lotion^ ^made^ ^of^ ^baby^ ^foreskin”^ ^and^ ^make^ ^plenty^ ^of^ ^sales^
Phineaz@feddit.org 3 days ago
I am aware, but it still looks very unsettling. The fake colour actually makes it worse I think, because I have seen plenty similar pictures in gray scale
angrystego@lemmy.world 3 days ago
It would only be smooth if it was shark skin.
sploosh@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Scanning electron microscopes image in a vacuum. Nothing looks 100% like it does at sea level when you suck all the air out.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 days ago
Pik pik pik
TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
I knit, tiny? makes me want to use a bandaid after I inject black yat heroim these days
Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 days ago
That old familiar sting.
JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 3 days ago
Most SEMs use a vacuum chamber to get their photos. Also, it’s also not uncommon to sputter a conductive coating onto the surface you’re scanning.
How the hell did they get this photo?
Pulptastic@midwest.social 3 days ago
Environmental SEMs do not require vacuum and can be used for nonconductive samples. The beam ionizes the air which prevents the sample from charging. Magnification is limited but it is more than enough for this.
You can tell it is SEM and not optical by the depth of field. An optical image at this magnification would have much less DoF so the peaks/valleys would be blurry.
JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 3 days ago
That’s very cool. I had not heard of ESEMs till you commented. I’ll have to look into them more.
ikidd@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Put a needle in someone, freeze them solid with liquid nitrogen, then take a picture. Throw body out with rest of specimens.
Easy peasy.
Duckingold@lemmy.world 3 days ago
It likely wasn’t done on an electron microscope, or at least there is no reason to. There is no scale bar, but quick look online tells me a very fine needle is about 0.016in. 500x magnification optical lens would give you more than enough resolution for a photo like that.
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
I’m more intrigued by the fact there’s no blood, they must’ve taken this milliseconds after the needle was removed? Or it’s a dead body.
jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 days ago
They could have remained a portion of the skin. But as another commenter notes, this is too large to need an electron microscope.
Zetta@mander.xyz 3 days ago
Probably just a chunk of skin, not a whole person
kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 days ago
NEEDLUSSY
hazl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
The pores on my face as seen by the naked eye.
lena@gregtech.eu 3 days ago
no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no
far_university1990@reddthat.com 3 days ago
Yes ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Siegfried@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Everything reminds me of her
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Wonder what it looks like after I scratch it for 50 minutes straight because my pain receptors are bad and I won’t stop till I see blood.
Allero@lemmy.today 3 days ago
Just about everything can seem big when you have an electron microscope
LordWiggle@lemmy.world 2 days ago
It also happens to be just big enough for Trump his penis.
socsa@piefed.social 3 days ago
I should also call your mom.
fox@hexbear.net 3 days ago
It’s from a series Anne Weston at the Francis Crick Institute did. Scanning electron microscopy. The full series is pretty cool.
Taleya@aussie.zone 2 days ago
Uh-huh.uh-huh. Yip yip yip yip yip
RavenFellBlade@startrek.website 2 days ago
Looks like the hole they dragged the Brain Bug out of.
Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Any hole’s a goal
latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
…hmmmmmm…
jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Also why you don’t re-use needles:
Image
LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 days ago
That’s not the main reason why we don’t reuse needles.
BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 3 days ago
One of the many
plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
For even into the same patient…
someguy3@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Can we see the skin after that sixth use?
MeatPilot@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Image