So a nucler reactor is just a kettle with an extra spicy heating element?
But yes.
Submitted 13 hours ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/f1ea9e76-d5cf-4af0-95ca-b2fef56d28a6.png
Comments
ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
neidu3@sh.itjust.works 11 hours ago
Yes. Water + spicy rocks. Everything else is solar power, which is also nuclear power, but with the spiciness in the sky instead.
Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 hours ago
Fun fact. Coal plants release more radioactive materials than nuclear plants.]
Except the ones that blew up. Those ones were extra spicy.
Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 5 hours ago
- Solar panels: Direct sky-spiciness to electricity conversion
- Wind: Sky-spiciness made the air move
- Hydroelectric: Sky-spiciness lifted the water up, gravity brings it down
- Fossil fuels: Really old stored sky-spiciness from ancient plants
jagungal@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
I mean, radioactive isotopes are formed in supernovae, so it’s really just solar power from a different sun, right?
darthelmet@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Not spicy. Everyone knows nuclear power is lemon-lime flavored.
ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Taste: slightly metallic, not great, not terrible.
gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 hours ago
Cherenkov: The blue raspberry of nuclear radiation
Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 7 hours ago
Most power generation is just steam spinning turbines. Solar’s just weird. Wind cuts out the steam loop.
BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 19 minutes ago
What about hydro electric? It uses cold steam
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Reflective solar is normal at least. But photovoltaics are weird. Even weirder is that they’re LEDs backwards, and the fact that transistors just are like that is why they’re encased in black plastic
NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
That’s not a spicy challenge id be willing to try.
ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 4 hours ago
This is reminds me of a quote from one of the Encased loading screens.
To paraphrase it “Power generation before was about turning a turbine with steam. Under the Dome we have this fancy technology that we use to…turn a turbine with steam.”
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 12 hours ago
It was realizing that a lot of our power is still, at its core, a steam engine
mosiacmango@lemm.ee 11 hours ago
We discovered a banger like 200 years ago and have held on tight until eight about now with wind/solar/hydro.
Still going to be using their geothermal/fission/fusion for at least another 200 years though.
Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Hydro is just more dense steam, wind is less dense steam, it’s steam engines all the way!
Lussy@hexbear.net 10 hours ago
Mechanical engineers fist pumping after finding out their entire profession is not yet obsolete
hobovision@lemm.ee 7 hours ago
More like a steam turbine (which is way cooler cause it’s like a jet engine). Steam engine makes me think of a piston engine like on a train.
Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 hours ago
Seems to be just photovoltaics and spinny things.
Phoonzang@lemmy.world 17 minutes ago
There’s also fuel cells, where fuel is not burned to create steam to move something, but combined with oxygen in a different way (the end products still being the same) so the electrons shuttled around during this reaction can be utilised as electricity. Think of combustion as oxidation of your fuel, the oxidation meaning that you (among other things) move electrons from the fuel to oxygen. In combustion, unfortunately you can’t access the electrons directly, as they are always stuck in the chemical bonds of the molecules, that’s why we take the detour via heat/mechanical - the steam engine. The fuel cell now separates fuel and oxygen, and thus divides the combustion reaction into two parts that happen at opposite sides of the cell. Those sides are divided by a membrane that does not allow the electrons to transfer across, so they need to take a detour through an electric circuit, in which we can harvest them as electrical power.
I always found it really fascinating that fuel cells are the only other technology than solar where the electrons we use as electrical power are more or less directly generated as opposed to the detour via a generator. Unfortunately, fuel cells are still a very niche technique.
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Nuclear power is just steampunk with magic rocks.
halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Nearly all power generation comes down to boiling water to steam which spins a turbine.
I can only think of two common exceptions off the top of my head. Solar is an exception and Hydro power is an exception ironically, that usually uses the vertical difference and gravity to spin the turbine.
nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 46 minutes ago
There are gas turbine generators that directly use shaft power to generate electricity
davidgro@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 11 hours ago
Yeah, who would have guessed that modernity was invented by someone who stuck magnets to a fidget spinner and strapped it to a boiler.
subtext@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
One could even argue that hydro power is just boiling water, letting it condense, and then letting it spin a turbine
halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
I’ve never heard of Hydro power boiling water. Usually hydro power is natural or pumped storage.
You’re just taking water from an upper reservoir and dropping it to a downstream river. Either a naturally-filled reservoir/lake, or a pumped storage reservoir where you use other cheap power during low usage periods to pump that water to a higher reservoir to utilize later. The pump doesn’t heat the water, it just moves it uphill to utilize later, like the Taum Sauk Hydroelectric Power Station in Missouri.
usrtrv@lemmy.ml 11 hours ago
Wind? And binary cycle geothermal plants but not sure how common they are.
dalekcaan@lemm.ee 8 hours ago
Nuclearpower is just boiling waterRagingRobot@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
I bet there is a way more efficient way to harness it that we are just missing too lol
Anticorp@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
God damnit Jinyang!
disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Errich, is the refrigerator running? This is Mike Hunt, and he’s a rich.
PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 12 hours ago
Eric Bachman, this is your mother. You are not my son.
jballs@sh.itjust.works 9 hours ago
“This is you as an old man. I’m ugly and dead alone.”
unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 hours ago
I heard that somewhere in the US there were parts of a nuclear power plant being delivered by steam train. So that’s basically one steam engine supplying another! (^^,)
I can’t seem to find an article about it anywhere, so it might be an urban legend :(
A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Big Steam is playing us for suckers!
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 9 hours ago
They’re just spinning us in circles!
frezik@midwest.social 10 hours ago
Given that the first commercial nuclear power plants in the US were coming online in the late 1950s, that’s entirely possible. Steam trains were well on their way out by then, but there were still a few hauling freight around.
Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 10 hours ago
Sail ships continued to be used well into the 20th century. The absolute last purely sail powered warship served during WW1!
stupidcasey@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Nuclear power is the refining distilling and enriching of uranium into unstable isotopes and higher elements, boiling water is one small step in converting nuclear energy into electrical energy.
Rolder@reddthat.com 10 hours ago
But it’s one of the most important steps because it’s where the actual electricity comes from.
uis@lemm.ee 10 hours ago
into unstable isotopes
No, they were there all along.
Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
The issue is that boiling water is inside human bodies
RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
There are some fusion designs that use direct energy conversion.
TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 11 hours ago
plus a side of extra spicy land and groundwater
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 9 hours ago
That’s from building nuclear weapons though, not power
uis@lemm.ee 10 hours ago
And then there is thermonuclear generators
Draegur@lemm.ee 9 hours ago
“what if fire… But… MOAR”
plinky@hexbear.net 11 hours ago
LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Or melting salt, or whatever. But yes it’s just making stuff hot.
Des@hexbear.net 8 hours ago
still waiting for those molten fuel MHD reactors
JackbyDev@programming.dev 9 hours ago
Reminds me of the meme using the Donnie Darko psychologist template.
Donnie: I made a new form of power generation.
Psychologist: New or steam?
Donnie: Steam…
Draegur@lemm.ee 9 hours ago
Steam implies water! What if we used some OTHER phase-change working fluid? :D
||(No idea what, though. my question is implied with a playful tone and is at least 50% facetious; any actual discussion that might result would be little more than a pleasant coincidence)||
MehBlah@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
You want to see weird water look up super critical boilers. That stuff was nasty. A regular steam leak will set things on fire. That stuff would explode a broom. We looked for the leaks with straw brooms. You can’t see steam in normal conditions. Only its effects.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 hours ago
Tag yourself! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refrigerant
chaogomu@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Molten salt?
We can then use compressed CO2 in the place of steam to drive the turbine.
BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 7 hours ago
Like Dr. Pepper?