FauxPseudo
@FauxPseudo@lemmy.world
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 15 hours ago:
Can you state my position to me in terms I would agree with?
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 19 hours ago:
What is going on here? Something isn’t right about this conversation. We should not be this confused and talking past each other.
True or false: there has been no release by an AI company or anyone using AI to unmask the individuals obscured in the Epstein files.
- Comment on I was on social media before web browsers existed. I am Legion. 1 day ago:
66618055 I kept putting off getting on. I was online on the CompuServe days before Prodigy or AOL. I had three different places to access the internet back in 1992. My catchphrase is “I am from the internet. I’m here to help.” I deeply miss Usenet.
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 1 day ago:
I set up two different, not necessarily exclusive, options. Either it can’t do what they say or it can. If it can’t then that’s one issue. If it can then the people with something to prove aren’t stepping up to show us its potential. There could be multiple motivations behind that. But as it stands right now we just know that it’s not being used to do what they claim.
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 1 day ago:
Did you see the “or” in my first statement?
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 1 day ago:
My statement was that AI can be used unmask the individuals that have been redacted. AKA they are anonymized. This paper is all about de-anonomyzing.
I’m unclear on if we’re having a good faith conversation because I thought that would have been very clear from the beginning.
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 1 day ago:
My statement that I’m quoting predates this paper. My statement exists completely independent of this paper ever being produced. My statement is not about this paper. My statement is about the state of AI and the industry. This paper reinforces my statement.
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 2 days ago:
Seriously, I’m not qualified. No amount of appendix prompts and Dunning Kruger is going to change that.
I’m not demanding anything. I’m suggesting that AI can’t do what is claimed or that people with something to prove are not interested in proving something.
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 3 days ago:
I’m not qualified to design the prompts and home users can’t really pile in 3 million+ documents.
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 3 days ago:
That would be fun.
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 3 days ago:
In theory, using the information and the released files and the information the public sources, it should be possible to figure out who those redacted names are based on writing style and other factors. We should be able to deanonymize.
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 3 days ago:
Right?
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 3 days ago:
But that’s not the same, is it?
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 3 days ago:
You can use the results of the AI analysis to identify people and then use that to do a proper investigation. Right now none of that is happening. No speculation. No tangibles. No investigation. No indictment.
Trying to unmask people is a step in the right direction.
- Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy 4 days ago:
From a Facebook post I made on February 17th:
There are giant AI data firms that promise they can go through massive troves of data and pull out general and specific information from them. Information that is actionable and accurate. Give it 6 million data points and it’ll find all the links and organize them for you and unmask hidden details that aren’t visible to the naked eye.
Not one of those companies is stepping up to go through the publicly released Epstein files.
- Comment on Jeff Winger saying: "I discovered at a very early age that if I talk long enough, I can make anything right or wrong." is the most Reddit shit ever. 1 week ago:
I subscribe to over 200 podcasts. This was from Embrace the Void. Deep dives on the philosophy of sci-fi projects.
- Comment on Jeff Winger saying: "I discovered at a very early age that if I talk long enough, I can make anything right or wrong." is the most Reddit shit ever. 1 week ago:
Embrace the Void.
- Comment on Jeff Winger saying: "I discovered at a very early age that if I talk long enough, I can make anything right or wrong." is the most Reddit shit ever. 1 week ago:
Did you remember that because you’ve watched that episode way too many times or because you listen to a certain philosophy podcast that used it in their bumper for a very long time?
- Comment on Do not look at this if you live in Germany. 😐 1 week ago:
I don’t know that the NRA can really be included in that anymore. The administration has been very clear that it does not support gun rights. And the NRA did speak up, as much as their completely depleted budget would allow, against any idea that you can’t bring a gun to a protest.
The problem, in part, is that the you, the NRA has been completely neutered. Not by the bureaucrats of New York. Not by the insurance agencies. Not gun owners that are members. But by their own corrupt policies that drained their resources dry.
The NRA is no longer a factor in anything. They created their own cold dead hands.
- Comment on A joyful reminder 1 week ago:
I don’t like you.
- Comment on Device that can extract 1,000 liters of clean water a day from desert air revealed by 2025 Nobel Prize winner 1 week ago:
Came here to say this but knew in my heart that it had already been brought in.
- Comment on Forgive me, Doctor, for I have sinned: I haven't watched anything Trek in almost 2 months 1 week ago:
I’m not busy. I’m just not giving CBS a freaking dime because they are state controlled media. I’ll wait until I’m at a friend’s house or the regime collapses.
- Comment on Comic Strip Edits 1 week ago:
That was surprisingly painless.
- Comment on Meta Employee Deleted 9TB of Torrented Files, Adult Film Producers Claim 1 week ago:
12 years ago I was the proud owner of a half a terabyte USB drive.
- Comment on Meta Employee Deleted 9TB of Torrented Files, Adult Film Producers Claim 1 week ago:
It was most definitely parallel port. It was one of those rare relics of history that hardly anyone ever owned. That laptop was not capable of scsi. The read time was horrible. The write time was worse.
- Comment on Meta Employee Deleted 9TB of Torrented Files, Adult Film Producers Claim 1 week ago:
As of 9-11 I had a gig and a half of liberated media collected from Usenet. I know because I was running out of space on my external hard drive (connected by the printer port) and the bios was limited to two gb.
It’s amazing how far we have come in just, checks notes, 10 years.
- Comment on Comic Strip Edits 1 week ago:
Done.
- Comment on Comic Strip Edits 1 week ago:
Figured it was time.
- Submitted 1 week ago to newcommunities@lemmy.world | 6 comments
- Comment on Without hierarchies/authority figures, the bootlickers would be totally lost. 🤠 2 weeks ago:
