cross-posted from: lemmy.world/post/31924287
‘FuckLAPD.com’ Lets Anyone Use Facial Recognition to Instantly Identify Cops
Submitted 13 hours ago by ssroxnak@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.404media.co/fucklapd-com-lets-anyone-use-facial-recognition-to-instantly-identify-cops/
Comments
BigBenis@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
samus12345@sh.itjust.works 11 hours ago
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 hours ago
far left
From his PoV, he’s actaully standing on the far-right. Fitting lol
teft@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 11 hours ago
This is ILLEGAL when Working Class people Do It!
-Chuck Schumer at Some Point probably!
shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 13 hours ago
MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
nice.
Is there one for ice too?
Sinthesis@lemmy.today 40 minutes ago
From the article icespy.org/?ref=404media.co
RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 minutes ago
I took a selfie and I told me I was an ice agent… Wtf I’m such a piece of shit
Psythik@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Also what about cops outside of the LAPD? This app only useful if it works on any cop.
DemandtheOxfordComma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 hours ago
No. Those are gravy Seal wannabees. Ice isn’t doing anything on the streets. They are doing the behind the scenes stuff. Deputized bounty hunters are the ones in the streets. No badge, no authority, and as you know instantly disavowed.
paraphrand@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
So the people doing the snatching are gig workers? Is there TaskRabbit for fascism?
outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 hours ago
Uh, well someone’s doing it
crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Lmao let’s see how long it takes them to shut this down
NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 hours ago
Putting it out there for someone to do this for cops in the UK. I can’t run infrastructure but the cops terrorise out local community and constantly refuse to identify themselves/turn off their badge cam.
TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 12 hours ago
Should be easy to beat this and not worry about being identified and sued.
I know it will be hard guys, but how about:
“Don’t be a power tripping asshole”
You see people holding signs?
Don’t be a power tripping asshole and shoot tear gas, pepper shot, beat people, and shoot non-lethal rounds at them.
You see people marching?
Don’t be a power tripping asshole and shoot tear gas, pepper shot, beat people, and shoot non-lethal rounds at them.
You see reporters documenting it all?
Don’t be a power tripping asshole and shoot tear gas, pepper shot, beat people, and shoot non-lethal rounds at them.
“Don’t be a power tripping asshole.”
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
Also, “Don’t violate people’s constitutional advice, which you must have at least tangentially sworn to uphold.” 🤷♂️
C45513@lemm.ee 11 hours ago
another way to phrase it is “do your fucking job”
Demdaru@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
“You hear them boys?! We are not to humiliate those idiots! LIVE ROUNDS BOYS!”
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 12 hours ago
but what if they glare at me very menacingly, surely I can then shoot tear gas, pepper shot, beat people, and shoot non-lethal rounds at them, right?
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
they’re lookin at me Sarge. with their eyes.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
So, shoot live rounds, then?
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 hours ago
I don’t think the people you’re asking to not be a power tripping asshole understand that combination of words.
dinckelman@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
What are they so afraid of? They’re public servants, so they should be publicly identifiable. If they don’t like it, get off the government payroll
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Because criminals get out of jail and can go after their families. We had someone leave a bomb on the doorstep of a judge in our neighborhood.
grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 9 hours ago
I’m a librarian. I also work with members of the public, some of whom do not share my understanding of reality. My information is still public because I’m a government employee.
OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 hours ago
Am I the only one who thinks police should be held to a higher standard of accountabilities?
RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 9 hours ago
That really sucks. But a lot of innocent people have the police break into their homes and murder them so it balances out.
Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Such a shame. Anyway, I guess we’ll have to live with the consequences of technology.
Zenith@lemm.ee 9 hours ago
That’s a fair concern to a degree of course even the most fair sentences might have a disgruntled person on the other end of it but a fair justice system that serves and protects its community equally has little to fear overall. When a justice system is unfair, unequal, does not serve or protects its community that risk goes way up however they only have themselves to blame for the increased risk. An occasional crazy is just the price of being a human but if the public in general is against you, you’ve done that to yourself through your own actions
Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 7 hours ago
I wasn’t expecting crimes to go after their own families, but I’m here for it….
Was the judge a dick head?
ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 10 hours ago
Police the police
MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Good. ACAB.
jfrnz@lemm.ee 11 hours ago
Now do ICE!
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
Since they’re typically masked, I’d like to see gait recognition serve the working class for once.
AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 9 hours ago
I was thinking this too! Gait recognition can completely bypass facial coverings as a means of identification, but I also don't think it'll be much help here.
Gait recognition can be bypassed by things as simple as putting a rock in your shoe so you walk differently, so when you think about how much extra heavy gear, different shoes, and different overall movement patterns ICE agents will possibly be engaging in, it might not hold up well at tracking them down, especially since to recognize someone by gait, you'd need footage of them that you can already identify them in, to then train the model on.
In the case of fucklapd.com, this was easy because they could just get public record data for headshot photos, but there isn't a comparable database with names directly tied to it for gait. I will say though, a lot of these undercover agents might be easier to track by gait since they'll still generally be wearing more normal attire, and it might be more possible to associate them with who they are outside of work since it's easier to slip up when you're just wearing normal clothes.
Buelldozer@lemmy.today 7 hours ago
A lot of masks only work in the visible light spectrum. It’s entirely possible to “radar” images and remove them.
Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 hours ago
I found this link on the internet and have no affiliation:
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
is that just user submitted or do they have some sort of verification process (don’t ask me what it would be i can only think of stuff that works with nonfascist governments right now) because, well us and ours have fucked with similar forms too (e.g. that one texas abortion bounty hunter form comes to mind first)
Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 12 hours ago
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. But this shit will get sued so quick because “safety”
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
hail hydra?
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Breaking news!
First animal facial recognition tool invented!
Soon you’ll be able to prove another rancher stole some of your cattle,chickens,etc…
For now only works for pigs.paraphrand@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
👏
LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Is there ski mask recognition software that will work on ICE?
grrgyle@slrpnk.net 10 hours ago
TIL I look quite a bit like 2 LA cops in particular
General_Effort@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Highly illegal in Europe, obvs. Looking forward to finding out how this will go in the US.
dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 9 hours ago
What’s highly illegal in Europe? Taking a photo or using publicly available images to match that photo to?
As far as I know those things are not illegal, although as a Brit I wouldn’t be surprised if they label this terrorism lol
General_Effort@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
What’s highly illegal in Europe? Taking a photo or using publicly available images to match that photo to?
-
Taking a photo for that purpose is likely out.
-
Matching it to any publically available images is definitely out.
-
Creating a database of face images for searching: Nope.
-
Using this system is very problematic.
Some of this is because of the GDPR. So it’s likely to be illegal in the UK, as well. And some is because of the AI Act (in particular 4. but also 3. to some degree). That’s not something that needs to concern Brits.
-
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 hours ago
Sounds like fascism to me.
SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Maybe this will actually make politicians flip their opinion on AI… lmao
Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 hours ago
If the Big Beautiful Bill passes it will be extremely hard to regulate.
SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Means we have all the time in the world to turn it against them, then!
thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Love it
IllNess@infosec.pub 11 hours ago
This isn’t working for me. It’s just stuck on ‘Processing…’. It also has a Javascript error.
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
I get the impression that the cops are about to hate facial recognition all of the sudden, for no particular reason
chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
There’s a reason ICE conceal their faces.
They know what they’re doing is wrong and don’t want to be held accountable if their fascist rule collapses.
ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 hours ago
So just use one too and blend in. Put on a stupid Trump or racist hat, and if you are not white, put on gloves. Then surround them.
Arcka@midwest.social 4 hours ago
So which cameras can be used to overcome normal face coverings? piped.video/watch?v=yRFeS72IM6M
Ulrich@feddit.org 5 hours ago
Is that why the protestors where them too?
bytesonbike@discuss.online 7 hours ago
Cameras. They fucking hate body cameras. When it clears them of wrongdoing, they have the video ready. When they ‘accidentally’ shoot a guy nine times in the back of the head, video seems to be missing.
pyre@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
easily solvable problem: losing the footage is indication of guilt. you shoot someone, you better have it ready. it malfunctioned, better have a partner who has theirs ready. if no one has footageit’s used as evidence of guilt.
of course pussy ass lawmakers will never do that.
catloaf@lemm.ee 2 hours ago
I heard a bit on NPR over the weekend talking about copaganda. Turns out body cams are beneficial to cops, because they can take that footage and selectively edit and release it to push a certain narrative.
If you’ve ever seen a clip on social media, it often starts a few seconds before the cop hits someone, rarely showing the full sequence of events that led up to that point.
And if they can’t edit the footage to make them look good? “Oops, we didn’t retrieve that footage in time so it was overwritten.”
Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 11 hours ago
Upvoted and agreed, not least because I just learned that “all of the sudden,” while at present a nonstandard variant of “all of a sudden,” has valid history.
And of course it doesn’t matter in this casual context!
But in formal writing, in this era, using “a” will avoid distracting the reader from your main point.
samus12345@sh.itjust.works 11 hours ago
“All of the sudden” is only valid because it’s so commonly (incorrectly) used. Much as it annoys me, that’s just how language works.
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Non-Anglo here.
Totally not distracted bcs my brain autocorrected it to “all of a sudden” without even noticing.
A bit like “It deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are”
Also never seen/heard the “the” variant. (Well consciously that is).