MangoCats
@MangoCats@feddit.it
- Comment on RAM Prices Got You Down? Try DDR3. Seriously! 1 day ago:
Checking the year of manufacture of my daily driver laptop… 2018. It’s fine, it works well, does everything I need, just like it did 8 years ago when it was an “average” new laptop.
Oh, it’s also running Linux, I don’t know what would have happened if I left Windows on it - that got dumped in 2018 too.
- Comment on Ed Zitron on big tech, backlash, boom and bust: ‘AI has taught us that people are excited to replace human beings’ 1 week ago:
most people just go with ill-fitting off-the-shelf industrial goods instead.
The age of Amazon has made it so much worse… even poor people went to clothing stores and tried stuff on before buying it.
Now, if you don’t want to pay triple, you get it from mail order and just hope it fits - yeah you can return it if it doesn’t fit, but how much hassle is that, if it’s “close enough” people generally don’t bother, whereas if you were in the store you’d get the right size within a minute or two before buying it.
- Comment on 996 isn't about productivity, it's about keeping workers' living expenses low 1 week ago:
Resisting workers are unproductive, and annoying - you can see their perspective, right?
Mdme Antoinette, Mdme Antoinette, the peasants are revolting!
When have they not been?
- Comment on Ed Zitron on big tech, backlash, boom and bust: ‘AI has taught us that people are excited to replace human beings’ 1 week ago:
And what people are excited is the idea of replacing all non-pleasant work.
So, when do I get an AI to navigate the phone-tree for me (kind of like the advocate in Jupiter Ascending)?
- Comment on Ed Zitron on big tech, backlash, boom and bust: ‘AI has taught us that people are excited to replace human beings’ 1 week ago:
Oh, c’mon - have you EVER tried managing people? They’re a pain in the ass: expensive, unpredictable, needy beyond just the money they demand. Of course dimwit managers would rather outsource their people jobs to a service company wherever and whenever they can, let the service company do all that messy people-management.
What they’re missing is: those outsourcing service providers, even the ones providing AI “workers”, are themselves made possible by, staffed with: people. Your outsourcing bills are ultimately paying for: people. Once they become dependent upon these outsourced service providers, guess what? Their billing rates will go up and up and up right up to the point that it’s almost tempting to stop paying the service provider and just: hire their own people to do the work.
Worth the time to read: …medium.com/https-pluralistic-net-2025-03-18-asbe…
- Comment on 996 isn't about productivity, it's about keeping workers' living expenses low 1 week ago:
Well, really, it’s wage slavery. Work is all you have, and the pay you get is not enough to give you any freedom from the work.
As you say, you don’t have enough time / energy to go look for another job - such places also intimidate the workforce and arbitrarily fire workers who might signal that they are looking for another job (such firing probably being a favor in the long run, but not if you starve to death in the meantime…)
Ben & Jerry had it right with a 5:1 ratio. No person in a company’s time is “worth” more than 5x the value of another person’s time. Some incentive to develop skills, advance in your role, recognition of better performance, sure. At 5x, that should be enough to recognize your investment in yourself and your skills and your commitment to the company vs some guy who just shows up to push a broom. It wasn’t so out of line with “reality” when they did it in the 1980s, but today it just doesn’t work - the US is stratifying into classes/castes like the ones India is trying to abolish, just without explicit labels. The US system is based on how many digits are in your annual income figure: 4, 5, 6, 7, more?
UBI would go a long way toward rectifying all of this. Let business do what they will, provide every citizen with enough money to live, instead of 0 + whatever they can squeeze out of the bureacrazy by “demonstrating need.” If “illegals” can earn enough to live better here than elsewhere without any UBI, let them - if they get into financial trouble, give them assistance getting back to where they came from - otherwise: live and let live. At the very least, businesses would have to improve working conditions - otherwise the workers would just stay home until they find a better deal elsewhere. I can tell you from experience in the disabled community: people want work, they want to get out and have their value to society acknowledged with a paycheck - they also like to be able to buy shiny things. The current welfare system is a big bureaucratic stick hanging over their head threatening to beat them with benefit cancellation if they do get out and earn a little money.
- Comment on 996 isn't about productivity, it's about keeping workers' living expenses low 1 week ago:
On the surface I agree - what’s being shown at top headlines, etc. But the PRC wasn’t as TACO as 2025 USA.
- Comment on 996 isn't about productivity, it's about keeping workers' living expenses low 1 week ago:
Its random and arbitrary enforced.
A direction the US is moving towards…
- Comment on 996 isn't about productivity, it's about keeping workers' living expenses low 1 week ago:
It was practiced in the Chinese tech sector for a while, then made illegal by their courts - but it is still practiced in private firms there due to lax enforcement.
- Comment on 996 isn't about productivity, it's about keeping workers' living expenses low 1 week ago:
Now you’re being rational, looking at the big picture. Anyone promoting 996 is, first, using it for shock value, and second, promoting a: me first, me always, me only. perspective on what’s desirable - for the company owners. Workers? Meh, they bought trickle down once, why not try that again? /s
- Comment on 996 isn't about productivity, it's about keeping workers' living expenses low 1 week ago:
I hope it doesn’t spread outside of China, and I hope it ends (in practice) there soon.
“Although the Chinese Supreme People’s Court ruled 996 illegal in 2021, the practice remains a de facto standard in many private companies due to lax labor law enforcement.”
- Comment on 996 isn't about productivity, it's about keeping workers' living expenses low 1 week ago:
at the high health cost? Is it really worth it?
Look at who’s promoting 996, I don’t think any of them take any responsibility for their workers’ health.
- Submitted 1 week ago to showerthoughts@lemmy.world | 23 comments
- Comment on ‘They’ve pickled each others’ brains’ 1 week ago:
What he’s saying is that fascism prevents depression. Need more oil? Just go take it.
- Comment on ‘They’ve pickled each others’ brains’ 1 week ago:
500,000 jobs eliminated, how many of those 500,000 are still unemployed? Of those, how many have the means to “band together and take the billionaires down?”
- Comment on Google offers bargain: Sell your soul to Gemini, and it'll give you smarter answers 1 week ago:
It’s obvious that personalized services manipulate people to their detriment. They make people hate one another. They make people hate themselves.
I’d say that depends on who is in control of those services. The “big ones” like FB and X - sure, obviously. Others like BlueSky… less so. Reddit? Depends on how you use it. New Digg? Too early to tell.
And I want a blank slate when I talk to AI
In theory, yes, that’s what I want. In practice, I find that I get the best, most productive, results from AI when I just run a continuing conversation which it periodically “compacts” as its context window gets overloaded, but that remaining context almost always helps me get what I want out of the AI better than trying to re-state exactly everything I want for every interaction. Some of that is laziness, sure I could build my own context descriptions and “control” the LLM better, and I do create a body of specification documents as I go in an AI project, for the LLM to refer back to as needed, but for the main “conversation” I think it maintains the context window automatically better than I am capable of doing manually.
an algorithm that really understands what we want to see and tweaks every single response to match — is manipulating us. And I don’t want to be manipulated.
Some days, Google feels “in control” - I tell it what I like, what I don’t like, and content is shaped accordingly. Here, in the past month or so, I have felt a massive shift in what Google News is presenting me, tons of crap from X - much of it “aligned” to my point of view, but I don’t want “introductions to X” thank you very much, just switch it all off - but they don’t. And other news stories are quite a bit more “diverse” in their viewpoints than I was seeing several months ago, and I really don’t want to read the Proud Boys take on current events, thanks, no matter how elegantly dressed up it is.
If you are happy with a machine picking what you get exposed to, then you’ll do that and be happy.
It’s not that I’m happy, it’s that I really don’t have a choice. I can’t travel the whole world and make my own observations daily, and even if I did I wouldn’t have access to most of what matters… so, some form of curation in the news that reaches me is inevitable. I would like my sources to be as unfiltered and unbiased as possible (with the exception of filtering out sports and “entertainment”), but that’s always going to be an illusion. Cronkite and Brokaw were filtered and biased, they just did a good job of looking like they might not be.
I don’t want AI that I don’t strictly control the context of.
Good luck with that. Proto-AIs that you don’t control have been shaping the information that reaches you and everyone you know for decades now.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
Depends on how you count it: anvaka.github.io/map-of-reddit/?x=19755.639226167…
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
I actually care about the quality of statistical claims and data science
Then you’ve gotta be having a really bad time trying to analyze subjective data about posts in internet forums with basically zero positive identification of the authors.
Even if the authors bothered to “drill down” and check the posting history of each and every message author in a studied forum, that can be (and undoubtably frequently is) faked with boilerplate AI spam type generic responses all over a bunch of generic forums just to manufacture “validity” for the intended “high value” posts in the target areas.
If this sounds far-fetched, remember that over 20 years ago there were “gold farmers” playing WoW in China for the sole purpose of “earning” in-game value through repetitive play. Literally thousands of WoW accounts were banned just months after the game launched due to obvious farming activity.
All kinds of organizations pay for all kinds of advertising to “shape public opinion” on all kinds of topics. Only a small fraction of that advertising money gets dumped into traditional high profile channels like 30 second Superbowl spots.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
Those ex-military “consultant - analysts” gotta have something to do…
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
Corporate & Trolls Estimates:
A 2020 study (re-circulated in late 2025) found that in the top 100 subreddits—the primary sources for r/all—at least 15% of communities contained content likely posted by corporate trolls or bots designed to promote specific organizations.
Bot and Spam Removals:
Reddit’s Transparency Reports consistently show that “content manipulation” and “spam” (which include paid promotional agendas) account for the vast majority of admin-level removals. For instance, in early 2024, nearly 70% of admin removals were attributed to spam.
Prevalence of Bots:
Independent estimates and user analysis suggest that 5% to 20% of users in high-visibility subreddits may be bots. These bots are frequently used by bad actors to manufacture “consensus” or “outrage” to push specific agendas.
Infiltration Experiments:
Unauthorized research in 2025 demonstrated that AI bots can successfully pose as humans and engage in “psychological manipulation” to change user views in front-page subreddits like r/changemyview without being detected.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
r/SFWimaginarywerewolves
old.reddit.com/r/SubsIFellFor
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
live in fear, isn’t it? That’s what it is to be a corporate troll manipulating public opinion.
I can only imagine being paid to post “company” opinions in internet forums (my company pretty much trains / pays us to keep their name out of internet forums…) It seems like it would just be… depressing, soul sucking, dreary, but not particularly fear inducing.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
I’ve never used a Reddit app - just the web interfaces, almost always old.reddit.com these days. I see more like 4% advertisement, but it does vary by which sub-reddits I view. Doesn’t change the number of trolls whatsoever, but they also vary a lot depending on which sub-reddits you are in, typically the more popular, the more it is overrun with trolls.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
The 2025 Superman movie hits it pretty hard with Lex Luthor’s “monkey bots.”
Considering that Blizzard had to mass-ban thousands of WoW gold farmers back in 2005, it should be no surprise whatsoever that all kinds of commercial and political “value” are being “farmed” in every major internet forum today, using every kind of cheap labor available.
How many of these trolls are now using AI to auto-generate their content?
- Comment on Google offers bargain: Sell your soul to Gemini, and it'll give you smarter answers 1 week ago:
the amount of corporate-personalized shit I want in my life
would be zero when unsolicited. Don’t send me SMS, don’t send me e-mails, NEVER have my home speaker announce things I didn’t explicitly ask for.
However, when I search for things, make requests of “the cloud” to bring me information, I do appreciate having my personal history influence those results. I don’t want to sift through all the NFL, NBA, NHL, etc. score results and commentary just to get a weather forecast. I don’t want to see all the “big celebrity / entertainment news” mixed in with my local news. And, this means that some degree of customization of my feeds and search results is necessary to steer those results to my preferences.
Would I appreciate having more direct, intuitive, transparent control of the filtering? Hell yes. Is anybody offering anything better than Google out there right now? Very few, and mostly of very limited capability. Please prove me wrong with links to examples in your responses.
- Comment on Police Unmask Millions of Surveillance Targets Because of Flock Redaction Error 1 week ago:
It’s MAD on the local scale…
- Comment on Police Unmask Millions of Surveillance Targets Because of Flock Redaction Error 1 week ago:
Never said I would shoot them, just pointing out the reality of modern life that the only possible response is to go interact with unknown belligerent members of the public in person, who may themselves be carrying firearms…
- Comment on Police Unmask Millions of Surveillance Targets Because of Flock Redaction Error 1 week ago:
Oh, that’s what the photos / videos are for… but, sure, circumstantial evidence is super basis for harassment of the innocent.
- Comment on Police Unmask Millions of Surveillance Targets Because of Flock Redaction Error 1 week ago:
The real conundrum is: once you have unique identifiers on vehicles - which pretty much all countries with cars have - where’s the line? Do you require people to visually read the plates and write them down on paper? Who is allowed to keep databases of the information? How do you prevent people from keeping their own private databases? How do you prevent someone from creating a dash-cam app that does GPS/time coded databasing of all plate numbers it observes while driving? If a neighborhood HOA wants to network all their dash (and fixed location) apr-cam information into a central database, when does it become too much to allow? And how do you possibly enforce overstepping of the limits?
Scenario: A HOA has fixed cam automatic plate reader information and video evidence that proves XM3 5D9 was out smashin’ mailboxes on Friday night. The HOA president is cruising downtown Saturday morning and finds XM3 5D9 parked on the street, using his dash mounted apr software, calls the cops (in a vain attempt) to have them come arrest the mailbox smashers who were recorded in close-up 4K high def night vision doing the deed from the window of their car. This feels close to the over-stepping limit, but what if there were no cameras or software involved and the same XM3 5D9 plate ID was used by the same people to make the same accusation of the same mailbox smashers, this time based on telephoto chemical film pictures?
- Comment on Police Unmask Millions of Surveillance Targets Because of Flock Redaction Error 1 week ago:
Our (prior) neighborhood had 3 miles of roads with one entrance, a 911 call could get a sheriff’s car response to block the entrance with a description of the vehicle (plate number, even).
Our current neighborhood, only 1/4 mile of road, so yeah, you’d have to shoot 'em.