image of text that people with accessibility needs can’t read
very bad
Submitted 10 months ago by Trex202@lemmy.world to youshouldknow@lemmy.world
image of text that people with accessibility needs can’t read
very bad
I tried THUNDEROUS888 but it didn’t work. Very frustrating.
Hi, as a published writer: There is nothing wrong with very as long as you don’t repeat it needlessly.
A lot of these guides are very, very stupid.
Very UwU
Don’t say “Very UwU,” say “Nyaaaaaaaaa :3”
“I never give advice, but there is one thing I wish you would do when you sit down to write news stories, and that is: Never use the word ‘very.’ It is the weakest word in the English language; doesn’t mean anything. If you feel the urge of ‘very’ coming on, just write the word ‘damn’ in the place of ‘very.’ The editor will strike out the word ‘damn,’ and you will have a good sentence.”
—William Allen White
This is very obnoxious.
Thanks! That’s actually useful to enrich my speech
Challenge accepted. I’ll try to avoid that word for as long I possible. I’ll ping you next time I realise I fail.
I don’t think very fast and Swift line up at all. I could describe a car is very fast but I don’t think I would describe it as Swift.
On a related note why is my voice to text Auto capitalizing the word Swift? Also Auto apparently.
High velocity
Not even the Suzuki Swift?
Swift is more to do with agility than speed, I’d say.
Swift makes me think acceleration, and/or short-term speed. I wouldn’t call a marathon record-breaker “swift”.
Don’t say “very accurate,” say “exact”
“exact” is a synonym for “very precise,” not “very accurate.”
The percentage of people among the general population who know the difference is about 2.5356%. I’ll allow it.
2.5356%. clever. (But is that accurate?)
What could I use then?
Just say accurate?
Depends on the meaning of “accurate” (e.g. an archer, a research paper, a copy…).
Impeccable; flawless; dead-on; faithful – if I had to choose one, I’d pick “impeccable”
I agree!
Accuracy and precision; when I used to shoot archery long ago; measure different things, accuracy is a measure of the spread of your shots, precision is a measure of how close to the middle your shots are.
Apologetic for taking a compelling shit on your porch.
Its a fuckin ad
And I would be thrilled to fucking death to see more ads just like it. Touch my brain lovingly, don’t just fuck it.
v cool thanks op
Verily verily verily verily, life is but a stream~
Better than petite and downy.
First laugh all day, teared up a bit. Jesus!
My wife is always, “Your skin is so soft, like a girl!”
Thanks?
My penis is very difficult arduous
I also heard it was obese and kind.
ad, silence, brand
Yeah, so, you can still add “very” in front of all these words, so check-mate! :V
This reminds me of a teacher I had in elementary school that hated the word “stuff.” It was banned from his classroom and you would lose points if you ever used the word in assignments…
Not sure why, but that really stuck with me, and I still try to avoid using the word when I can.
There’s almost always a better word to use.
It is about challenging yourself to use a broader vocabulary and not to stuck with black filler or the broadest term that come to mind. These day I try to learn how to recognised tree. So I challenge myself not to use this word any more: I’m seeing an oak or an fir, a coniferious, a blackthorn but not a tree.
Real, hella, and doubleplus also work
Don’t say
I’ll say whatever the fuck I want however I want to. If you don’t like it, you’re free to leave.
You don’t have to be so very exasperated about it :( /s
Very free
One might even say “unrestricted”
It’s not a guide, it’s a list.
What psychopath would say “that car looks swift!” vs “that car looks very fast”
Just say zoombastic like a normal person.
This is a very shitty (craptastic) advert
Who says “very frightened”? They just say “terrified”, which is surprisingly NOT what the infographic recommends! And “very perfect” is just nonsense. So is “very well-to-do”, which feels like they worked backwards instead of figuring out what “very wealthy” would be.
These guys need to proofread their own work, I guess.
Very nice list
Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
The very first thing written by a something called “proofreading services.com” is functionally wrong. That’s a helluva start.
“exact” and “very accurate” are not the same thing. Not by a long shot.
“Very accurate” still leaves room for innacuracies while “Exact” does not. So why exactly would I trust a service whose very first sentence is an error?