That looks like a list of words to use instead of ‘very <something>’, not instead of ‘very’. I think people are going to be confused by statements like ‘the bill is exact accurate’.
[deleted]
Submitted 5 weeks ago by Trex202@lemmy.world to youshouldknow@lemmy.world
Comments
Libra@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
edgemaster72@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
But I want to use a modifier for the added emphasis
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 5 weeks ago
image of text that people with accessibility needs can’t read
very bad
ilinamorato@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
“I never give advice, but there is one thing I wish you would do when you sit down to write news stories, and that is: Never use the word ‘very.’ It is the weakest word in the English language; doesn’t mean anything. If you feel the urge of ‘very’ coming on, just write the word ‘damn’ in the place of ‘very.’ The editor will strike out the word ‘damn,’ and you will have a good sentence.”
—William Allen White
pseudo@jlai.lu 5 weeks ago
Challenge accepted. I’ll try to avoid that word for as long I possible. I’ll ping you next time I realise I fail.
Goretantath@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Verily verily verily verily, life is but a stream~
madjo@feddit.nl 5 weeks ago
Very well! Thanks for this very captivating list of very much every replacement of the word very.
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
If you just read the right side, the last word sounds like a noun.
Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
The very first thing written by a something called “proofreading services.com” is functionally wrong. That’s a helluva start.
“exact” and “very accurate” are not the same thing. Not by a long shot.
“Very accurate” still leaves room for innacuracies while “Exact” does not. So why exactly would I trust a service whose very first sentence is an error?
LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
I tried THUNDEROUS888 but it didn’t work. Very frustrating.
Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Hi, as a published writer: There is nothing wrong with very as long as you don’t repeat it needlessly.
A lot of these guides are very, very stupid.
crowbar@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Very UwU
name_NULL111653@pawb.social 5 weeks ago
Don’t say “Very UwU,” say “Nyaaaaaaaaa :3”
njm1314@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
I don’t think very fast and Swift line up at all. I could describe a car is very fast but I don’t think I would describe it as Swift.
On a related note why is my voice to text Auto capitalizing the word Swift? Also Auto apparently.
pineapplelover@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
High velocity
oo1@lemmings.world 5 weeks ago
Not even the Suzuki Swift?
LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 5 weeks ago
Swift is more to do with agility than speed, I’d say.
shalafi@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Swift makes me think acceleration, and/or short-term speed. I wouldn’t call a marathon record-breaker “swift”.
SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 weeks ago
Tattorack@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Yeah, so, you can still add “very” in front of all these words, so check-mate! :V
mechoman444@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Blurry. But yes… Comprehensive.
leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 5 weeks ago
Personally I’m partial to replacing very x for more x¹ than a very x thing in a pot.
I’m fairly certain I got it from Blackadder, but I can’t recall the episode.
1.– Or xer, where appropriate.
HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
Funny enough, a large chunk of replacement words come from Latin
Nikls94@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Do you see this **brief** girl with the **ashen** face and the **constricting** pants that only covered **tiny** of her butt? That top had a **profound** cutout and looked **slack** on her. I’m **apologetic** you didn’t see her. She looked like she carried **leaden** handbag though.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
They’d do one to help people say anything instead of “literally”, but it would just be
Literally -- just use other words
…and that’s it