One particularly brutal review came from Nick Hilton, film critic for the Independent, who said that the first lady came off in the film as “a preening, scowling void of pure nothingness” who leads a “vulgar, gilded lifestyle.”
Hilton added that the film is so terrible that it fails even at being effective propaganda and is likely to be remembered as “a striking artifact… of a time when Americans willingly subordinated themselves to a political and economic oligopoly.”
Jokulhlaups@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It was just a 75mil payment from Amazon to trump. Movie was just the means to do the transaction.
SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Coincidentally, Ratner just got greenlit for Rush Hour 4, which had been in development hell since 2018.
hector@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Jackie Chan is the best. Must be a little long in the tooth now.
loutr@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Even so, they had a massive budget, a competent director, and they didn’t manage to produce something that paints her in a good light.
VitoRobles@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Oh he’s competent alright.
yahoo.com/…/director-melania-trump-film-pictured-…
ferrule@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
The best way to launder money is to have a front that is legit. This way it pass the smell test if you just plug your nose a little.
I would assume bribes work the same way.
tburkhol@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Malicious compliance?
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I don’t understand the spending of millions on marketing.
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Money laundering opportunity?
MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 month ago
As usual, people are giving way too much credit to Trump. The money wasn’t given to him, it was spent on making the shitty movie.
tomiant@piefed.social 1 month ago
The film industry is just one massive money laundering scheme.