Copper doesn’t get used up. The blue rocks in the picture are basically copper rust. We just need to use it in smart ways…no copper pots or door handles. Or at Least identify and recycle it more efficiently by returning used electronics to the stores we purchased them from. Those places should have a plan on how to dismantle the used electronics and how to reuse the materials.
Geologists doubt Earth has the amount of copper needed to develop the entire world
Submitted 10 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
altphoto@lemmy.today 10 months ago
bassad@jlai.lu 10 months ago
Copper pots and door handles are very smart products as copper has killing bacterias properties, it is self cleaning, in some way.
altphoto@lemmy.today 10 months ago
Its possible to just coat the surface if that’s the effect needed. I was so happy a year ago that I had found copper Ethernet wire. However upon inspection recently the wire is basically aluminum coated in copper. Usually, platers will first clean the surface and then electro less coat nickel on aluminum. Then you can coat other things like copper. Aluminum forms an oxide almost instantly in normal atmosphere so its difficult to coat with anything. But electroless nickel works very well after an HCl bath or a nitric bath.
filcuk@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
We just need to use it in smart ways We’re more likely to get copper from asteroids first before using our resources wisely
sulgoth@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Didn’t China just punt off a ticket to some asteroids? Viability tests maybe?
Allero@lemmy.today 10 months ago
-
We do have enough copper
-
Copper can be replaced with other materials in many applications
While we should always be careful about how we expend natural resources, we should not fall into sensationalism.
-
wieson@feddit.org 10 months ago
Ea-Nasir, you sold me an insufficient earth!!!
perestroika@lemm.ee 10 months ago
In our modern times, Ea-Nasir still has some bars of aluminum to sell you. Quite several, in fact. :)
samus12345@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Ea-Nasir treats his customers and the world with contempt.
AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
Well the earth is already developed enough so i guess the copper was enough???
NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Catch me in Uganda
AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
Yeah but maybe instead of wasting all pur fucking resources on phones which we buy every year we could pour some of that into developing critical infrastructure in places that need it. Also aluminium, if youre desperate, is a pretty good replacement for copper. I have a really hard time believing copper would be an actual bottleneck in this.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
-
this website is cancer. I’m I’m mobile and counted 6 ads in my view with space left for 3 lines of text. Don’t post crap like this. Yes, i normally use an ad blocker but this is inside the connect app
-
it could be theess of a website but i saw no link to a peer reviewed publication, so i think its safe to assume were good with he cooper
-
r0ertel@lemmy.world 10 months ago
This smells a little funny, as others have suggested. I read an article a while ago that suggested that we’re not running out of raw materials; we’re thinking about the problem wrong:
Chachra proposes that we could – we must – treat material as scarce, and that one way to do this is to recognize that energy is not. We can trade energy for material, opting for more energy intensive manufacturing processes that make materials easier to recover when the good reaches its end of life. We can also opt for energy intensive material recovery processes. If we put our focus on designing objects that decompose gracefully back into the material stream, we can build the energy infrastructure to make energy truly abundant and truly clean.
This is all outlined in the book How Infrastructure Works from Deb Chachra.
someguy3@lemmy.world 9 months ago
The problem is the cost of each. Right now material is dirt cheap and energy prices are going up. And we are not good at long term planning.
NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 10 months ago
That would be great except for one problem: capitalism. Proper recovery and recycling of materials will never happen so long as production of new materials is cheaper.
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Also capitalism’s need for infinite growth has lead us to impose engineered “demand creation” (through advertising) and now even “growth hacking” to supercharge this process. It has made us more wasteful than ever. We are headed into a wall.
Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Abolish copper coins. Job done :-)
TheRealKuni@midwest.social 10 months ago
Largely done already, as I understand it. Most use zinc now.
nyan@lemmy.cafe 10 months ago
How much old copper piping is still out there that could be replaced by other materials to recover the copper? I’m sure there are other common obsolete applications. The nice thing about metals is that we already have a pretty robust recycling chain in place for them. That plus the remaining supply plus aluminium plus other replacements plus careful design to minimize the use of copper where it’s absolutely necessary might be enough to carry us through.
humanspiral@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Aluminum is a substitute for copper in any straight wiring application.
MangoCats@feddit.it 10 months ago
There’s also the idea of crashing a metallic asteroid somewhere convenient, like the Outback.
astropenguin5@lemmy.world 10 months ago
If you have the tech to do that, just capture the asteroid in orbit and mine it in space.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Yeah, that ain’t happening for the next 50 years. The amount of logistics and technology required for that is beyond immense, never mind risks
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 10 months ago
“General, we need to consult all of the local meth addicts, stat.”
nyan@lemmy.cafe 10 months ago
They’ll have scavenged the abandoned buildings in built-up areas, yes. Still-occupied buildings and those in smaller towns with no easy access to a scrapyard are more likely to be intact. So it’s more likely to be a case of “these are no longer to code, they are not grandfathered, you have a two-year grace period to switch them out” (staggered geographically or by building classification to avoid a run on plastic pipes) plus “road trip!”
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Good think we can use aluminum and copper then…
isekaihero@ani.social 10 months ago
There could be two ways to address this problem. One is asteroid mining, which has the potential to be extremely lucrative because there are lots of asteroids with huge metal deposits.
Another is discovering new conductors. There’s been progress in developing conductive plastics. phys.org/…/2022-10-scientists-material-plastic-me…
RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 10 months ago
Fuck, even more plastics?
TheRealKuni@midwest.social 10 months ago
Plastics aren’t inherently bad. Just like anything else, it’s the misuse that makes them bad.
Child_of_the_bukkake@lemmy.cafe 10 months ago
Well couldn’t we, like, share it? The average joe in america is consuming 100 times more than an indian
P1nkman@lemmy.world 10 months ago
But that would be unfair to the average Joe! And think about the billionaires; how would they survive if everything was shared? /s
Greyghoster@aussie.zone 10 months ago
Sounds like doomish stuff. We innovate all the time. If copper and lithium are short supply items then technology will morph to use something else.
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Eh. Or we could just keep some areas impoverished and underdeveloped and profit off their cheap labor…
!remindme 15 years
lectricleopard@lemmy.world 10 months ago
This was my first thought, we aren’t going to develop the whole world. That’s not how this works. Who said that was a goal of… well … anyone’s?
That’s a rhetorical question. Frfr tho, does that remind me work on your instance only, or what’s the deal with that?
Archangel1313@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Have they tried pulling it out of the walls of abandoned buildings? There’s a lot left in there that no one uses anymore. /s
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 10 months ago
they just need Detroit crackheads. five guys and a week and they’ll have every building in Houston stripped.
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
This all suggests that we keep producing, wasting and manufacturing things infinitely without ever recycling, reusing or re purposing everything that we are mining out of the ground. The article notes that this includes recycling but only at the rate we have now.
If we keep running our world the way we are now for the next hundred yes … than yes, we are going to run out of everything because we live in an absolutely wasteful society that only runs in a way to produce things designed with planned obsolescence to break down in a short amount of time so that we can produce more junk to sell and drive a stupid economy to make a small group of idiots even more wealthy. The whole system is designed to run on making infinite money by producing infinite junk that doesn’t last long.
Yes at the rate we are going and the way we are producing things and the way we shape our economy and the way we base our manufacturing … we are definitely going to run out of everything.
We can change our economy and the way we produce and manufacture things - and get rid of this stupid structure of society of just endlessly making money for a small group of morons … or we can keep doing things the way we are now until we run off a cliff and destroy everything and drive our species into extinction.
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 10 months ago
When we run out of things, it’s we who run out of things but not those with power to get what they need and kill excess population.
So preaching to them is useless.
acosmichippo@lemmy.world 10 months ago
The article notes that this includes recycling but only at the rate we have now.
The original study says they assumed an annual increase of 0.53% as observed over the last 20 years.
masterspace@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
What is this publication and who finances it because this section is incredibly sus:
Copper use is not carved in stone. Hybrid cars, which pair small batteries with gasoline engines, need far less of the metal than fully electric vehicles.
Power grids that mix nuclear, wind, solar, and a pinch of natural-gas backup can slice the copper bill dramatically compared with battery-heavy systems.
“First of all, users can fact-check the study, but also they can change the study parameters and evaluate how much copper is required if we have an electric grid that is 20% nuclear, 40% methane, 20% wind, and 20% hydroelectric, for example,” Simon said. “They can make those changes and see what the copper demand will be.”
Like you think we can transition to an increasingly electrified world, where all power comes from electric utility lines, and you think our copper usage will be … just in renewable power plants?
This reads like straight fossil fuel propaganda. In an electrified future the majority of copper use comes from distribution lines and products that use electricity not the type of power plants generating electricity.
_stranger_@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Do they think the copper is consumed? Like, renewable resources burn copper?!
brown567@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Most electrical transmission lines are aluminum because it’s cheaper and lighter
GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 10 months ago
In a lot of cases you can also use Aluminum instead of copper. You need thicker wires and it’s less flexible, but it’s doable and cheaper. Some old electric motors from the eastern block used aluminium coils for that matter, because copper was much more expensive there.
barsoap@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Aluminium is actually a better conductor than copper when you judge it by mass, not volume. I think also by tensile strength.
In any case there’s a reason that large overland wires aren’t copper, but steel-cladded aluminium. Copper will always have its applications but so does gold and yet we’re not running out of gold to plate connections with.
In cases like windings requiring more volume is actually an issue, in the case of PCBs… no, despite Apple’s insistence, it’s actually fine to have a phone that’s 0.2mm thicker.
frezik@midwest.social 10 months ago
The US is allergic to it, but needs to get over it.
Aluminum wire was tried in the 1970s due to a spike in copper prices. The problem was that they just tried to swap it right in. Aluminum and copper have different rates of expansion. Over time, that would slowly loosen the connectors, and the wires would pop right out and cause a fire.
You can design connectors to handle both, and you’ll see many electrical things today specify that they’re good for aluminum or copper wire. It still has a bad reputation among electricians; they haven’t unlearned the problem yet.
Now, one place it’s more of a problem is in things like transformer windings. There are kilometers of wiring in any of them, so the higher resistance of aluminum is a problem.
raltoid@lemmy.world 10 months ago
-
The article is shit, the study is about copper used reducing fossil-fuel power generation. It is basing the projected use of copper on windmills and especially large batteries.
-
Those high-powered and long distance power lines are made aluminium and steel.
masterspace@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
- Distribution doesn’t just include long distance distribution. It includes all the wiring between transformers and houses and all the internal wiring of the house and all the devices inside etc.
-
SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 10 months ago
You’re wrong in terms of long distance power lines being mostly copper, but this does seem a lot like fossil fuel propaganda.
Motors, generators, and transformers can be built using aluminium; they’re just a bit bulkier and less efficient. Very common practice.
It looks like CCA might be making its way back into house wiring in the near future, with much lower risks than the 70s aluminium scare.
The big thing is that batteries really should be a last resort, behind demand response (using power when it is available, rather than storing it for later), long distance transmission, and public transport instead of private vehicles.
masterspace@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
You’re wrong in terms of long distance power lines being mostly copper, but this does seem a lot like fossil fuel propaganda.
Motors, generators, and transformers can be built using aluminium; they’re just a bit bulkier and less efficient. Very common practice.
What I mean is that the bulk of current copper wiring goes towards distribution and consumption, not generation.
The big thing is that batteries really should be a last resort, behind demand response (using power when it is available, rather than storing it for later), long distance transmission, and public transport instead of private vehicles.
This isn’t a big thing. This is a constant thing in every system. It’s the push and pull between efficiency and resiliency. More storage capacity is less efficient when things are going well, but is more resilient and adaptable when they’re not.
r_deckard@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Heh. My batteries are flooded lead-acid, all 1320ah of 'em. No copper guilt here.
acosmichippo@lemmy.world 10 months ago
it sounded like they were trying to say battery grid storage is going to be the main problem here:
After the introduction of smartphones, wind turbines, and high-capacity batteries, copper’s role has grown from important to indispensable.
except the article they linked is about lithium-CO2 batteries and does not mention copper at all.
Even if we really do need to reduce grid storage to save copper, we can do that with more baseline nuclear power, no need to keep involving fossil fuels.
masterspace@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Or you use pumped hydro, or compressed air, or gravity batteries, or any of the other energy storage technologies that aren’t chemical batteries.
douglasg14b@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Your argument against the article that talks about copper usage is founded on incomplete knowledge of where copper is actually used?
🤦
masterspace@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
It’s founded on the article not making a cohesive argument. Current copper usage is primarily in consumption and distribution, not generation.
carbs@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’m not defending the article, but I think most overhead power lines are aluminium, which is probably good as it’s abundant compared to copper.
Geodad@lemm.ee 10 months ago
The problem with aluminum is that it gets REALLY hot when current is run through it. It used to be ised to wire homes, but is now banned because it wasn’t safe.
52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
I remember when phone lines were made of copper. We were sure that it would be impossible for everyone to have a phone.
r_deckard@lemmy.world 10 months ago
There’s a lot of copper pairs left underground. Many hundreds of thousands of kilometres of it. Use it as a pull-through for fibre-optic bundles, and everyone can have gigabit internet.
Seriously though, there’ll come a time when that underground obsolete copper will become economic to retrieve.
52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
One of my family members had that job for a good while. What’s interesting is the phone companies did not keep great records of what’s copper and where it is, so a lot of it is likely to remain in place for a long time. Something else he has seen is thieves cutting fiber, thinking it is copper, and causing outages, although that is less frequent than it was years ago.
ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
All kinds if copper are economic to achieve with enough crack
shalafi@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Only in first-world countries did everyone have a phone and the Earth’s population was half what it is now.
floo@retrolemmy.com 10 months ago
Perhaps it’s time to start researching alternative materials.
dgriffith@aussie.zone 10 months ago
Perhaps it’s time to start researching alternative materials.
Plenty of metals floating around in space. Just need to go and get them.
Only need to capture one decent sized metalliferous asteroid from a near earth orbit and we’d be set for a century or two.
troyunrau@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Things like platinum notwithstanding, It will almost always be more expensive to go get things in space than on earth.
Hell, even on earth it is often too expensive to get metals like iron if there isn’t rail or a port nearby. Imagine having to fly iron ingots around and the associated aviation fuel cost. Whatever crazy fuel bill you’re imagining, multiply by a hundred or more if you’re imagining getting it from space.
No, all of those metals in space are best used to build some future version of our civilization _in situ. _
troyunrau@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
That alternative material is aluminum. It’s like a top four abundance material in the crust. It’s just super fucking hard to refine from minerals that don’t like to give it up without oodles of energy. Like, turn minerals into plasma levels of energy. So the irony is, to grow our energy economy past the need for copper, we will first need to grow our energy economy.
Should fusion ever actually meet its promise, then this is one of the likely things we could do with this level of energy.
If we ever become a spacefaring civilization, it’ll almost certainly be necessary during the colonization of other planets/moons/asteroids, since the geological processes that concentrate copper on the earth are not present in those places. Whereas aluminum is plentiful any place rocky.
kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Aluminium smelting is so energy intensive that Iceland, a country with a population of less than 400 000, is the world’s 12th largest producer of it, even though the raw materials aren’t mined there. Iceland just has cheap geothermal and hydroelectric power.
MisterD@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Aluminum expands under electrical loads and the wires become loose. Loose wires are a fire hazard.
The real solution is steel wire with a copper coating. Electricity flows on the outer region of wires anyhow.
qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 months ago
So the irony is
I see what you did there…
catloaf@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Recycling aluminum, however, is much more energy-efficient!
TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 10 months ago
asteroid mining
atlien51@lemm.ee 10 months ago
It’s ok just 3D print it :)