“X’s owner now has the ear of the president-elect, a man who has a long history of helping his friends, and punishing his enemies,” said Max Willens, senior analyst, at Emarketer. “Sending at least a trickle of ad spending toward X may be seen as good for business, albeit in an indirect way.”
There’s the article in a nutshell. Give Elmo money or face the wrath of the Diaper-in-Chief.
Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Bending the knee
kokesh@lemmy.world 1 month ago
And lifting their a## up, so they are better accessible
Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 month ago
Cupping the balls.
disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It doesn’t work that way with advertising. They need to go where their customers go. Bots don’t buy.
rezifon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This isn’t advertising, it’s tribute.
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 month ago
They don’t need to advertise anywhere.
TheFriar@lemm.ee 1 month ago
But Twitter has been bleeding users. And since the election there has been a very public exodus by bigger names. So this isn’t about “go where the viewers are.” This is “spend money to stay on the good side of someone who might be even more inordinately powerful with an incredibly powerful and vengeful sidekick.”
iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 month ago
with people leaving xhitter en masse, this is really more like bending the knee and licking assholes.