Workers should learn AI skills and companies should use it because it’s a “cognitive amplifier,” claims Satya Nadella.
in other words please help us, use our AI
Submitted 1 month ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to technology@lemmy.world
Workers should learn AI skills and companies should use it because it’s a “cognitive amplifier,” claims Satya Nadella.
in other words please help us, use our AI
AI is the new 3dTV
It’s way worse that 3Dtv.
Yes, 3d tv was pushed too soon. If they waited for the glassless technology (like the 3ds screen for example) I think we would have 3d screen everywhere. Now the tech is dead because people had a really bad perception of 3d tv.
Hey, I like my 3D TV. Every once in a while I manage to find a pirated video that’s in 3D and it’s pretty neat. And unlike the current avalanche of generative/LLM bullshit, I can turn the 3D off, and when I do it works just fine as a perfectly ordinary TV, and in no way does it nag me incessantly to turn it back on.
Hey, don’t be mean to 3DTV. At least there’s an actual use case for it. Watching 3D TV or movies, which aren’t actually that popular… Hmmm, I see your point but also counter with the 3D TVs are at least also regular TVs
Eeh didn’t you pay attention in economy 101? If you generate more supply than demand that’s a you problem. The free market will take care.
The products and services around ‘AI’ are deficient and dangerous, that’s what the market says. There’s no demand for bullshit products. It is the ignorance and unwillingness to understand of the tech bros that is revealed here. They don’t listen to the market, aka. the people.
I guess the sunken cost fallacy does its part as well
College degrees are scraps of paper to then. They go to those places to find people and make connections.
I went to university to learn and earn a degree. I didn’t make connections. Hence why I never landed a job.
AI can absolutely be useful. But it’s been wildly oversold and the actual beneficial use cases are not nearly as profitable as the marketing around it
“A great commander secures his victory before entering into battle. A poor commander first rushes into battle and then searches for victory.”
~Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Isn’t there plenty of research it’s the opposite of a cognitive amplifier, people get cognitively lazy using ai.
Geez, CEO’s don’t need any more excuses to be lazier. They gonna farm out their pointing and ordering people to carry out underlings’ ideas, and throwing tantrums, to AI?
On the flipside, I think the incentives for creativity/hard work have been eroded to the point that the outcomes don’t reflect the effort regardless of level.
Somebody above you is just going to steal your idea and get promoted for it, while you get fired so you you don’t blow their cover.
That’s not how technology is supposed to work.
can’t keep what you never had you corrupt piece of shit.
I got deepseek to run short roleplaying adventures that are surprisingly fun and engaging. It’s an amped up choose your own adventur, so for this application, the future is bright.
Not a single other llm can do this in any way approaching acceptable.
And it still lies and makes shit up, but in a fantasy world, the can let it pass unless it is trying to rob me of experience lol.
When it can do long sessions and entire careers instead of detailed one offs it’ll have found its niche for me. Right now, it’s just a fun toy, prone to hallucinations.
I can’t believe people use these things for code…
Right now, it’s just a fun toy, prone to hallucinations.
That’s the thing though - with an LLM, it’s all “hallucinations”. They’re just usually close to reality, and are presented with an authoritative, friendly voice.
(Or, in your case, they’re usually close to the established game reality!)
This is the thing I hope people learn about LLMs, it’s all hallucinations.
When an LLM has excellent data from multiple sources to answer your question, it is likely to give a correct answer. But, that answer is still a hallucination. It’s dreaming up a sequence of words that is likely to follow the previous words. It’s more likely go give an “incorrect” hallucination when the data is contradictory or vague. But, the process is identical. It’s just trying to dream up a likely series of words.
I can also see a lot of use in general for gaming! There might be a future where game assets are generated on the fly, dialogue and storylines are without artificial limits, no invisible borders in game worlds. The technology is useful, but not in the way those fools want to force it.
Yes, images where not every pixel is important. NPC-s going about their business. The traffic. The weather. Games will use it, I’m sure of it.
Fair, but compare that to the fun of an actual in-person TTRPG. It’s the main way I make new friends as an adult man.
Well you already lost that or rather never actually had that. You all pushed a broken and incomplete product you need to find a use not us…
AI is the only “product” that I’ve ever seen where the sales pitch is, “We made it and now you should want it, but you have to figure out why you want it.”
Even if I do want it, there are plenty of free models that I can use locally, on my desktop PC. They don’t phone home, either, so Nadella doesn’t see a cent from me directly or indirectly.
I hereby revoke my permission.
Honestly, this is the most reasonable take I have heard from tech bros on ai so far… Use it for something useful and stop using it for garbage!
Ai has a million great uses that could make so many things so much easier, but instead we are building AI to undress women on twitter
“we” aren’t doing that. The tech bros are.
Honestly that is one of the only things it is doing well
Women and children
To be honest, I did tried a couple of AI’s. But all I got where solutions that would never work on the stated hardware. Code full of errors and when fixed never functions as requested. On any non-technical questions it’s always agreeing and hardly (not at all actually) challenging any input you give it. So yeah, i’m done with it and waiting for the bubble to burst.
Sorry buddy but you are not “smart enough” to use that super powerful tool that supposedly can do everything extremely convenient for you! /s
While I agree with you, it sounds like you have only tried LLMs back in the day. They have become a lot better in recent times.
Especially when you want code, the differences are stark between an old LLM and a recent programming optimized LLM like Claude.
We need an American Zelenskyy who would save us from the oligarchs.
Like a president but good?
leader of the free world
Do something useful
What do you mean, that using ChatGPT for a recipe for eggs, sunny side up without any seasoning or toppings and burning up the electricity of a moderate household for a week with my query isn’t useful?
Allrecipes has you covered.
No. No, it really doesn’t.
I want a vegan recipe that uses turbinado sugar. I get 3 articles and only one of them is a recipe. If I don’t like that recipe…too bad. That’s what they have.
It’s not the query that burns through electricity like crazy, it’s training the models.
You can run a query yourself at home with a desktop computer, as long as it has enough RAM and compute cells to support the model you’re using (think a few high-end GPUs).
Training a model requires a huge pile of computer power though, and the AI companies are constantly scraping the internet to stealfind more training material
Dunno if that’s true or not. Generally, much more compute is used in inference than training, since you only train once, then use that model for millions of queries or whatever. However, some of these AI companies may be training many models constantly to one-up each-other and pump their stock; dunno. The “thinking” model paradigm is also transferring a lot more compute to inference. IIRC OpenAI spent $300k of compute just for inference to complete a single benchmark a few months ago (and found that, like training, exponentially increasing amounts of compute are needed for small gains in performance).
The number of adults I know who ask ChatGPT for recipes is non-zero.
Teenagers use it like it’s a search engine. They don’t understand the difference.
Buddy, I hope you will lose social permission to keep your head attached to your body. All your heads on spikes, is what I wish for.
They don’t have that permission
My sole use for AI has been troubleshooting computer issues. I will say that AI often does a better job than first line tech support when prompted correctly. That being said, I am a tech nerd who knows more than the average computer user that is not in the IT industry. There will always be a reason for human tech support tiers for people who cannot prompt AI correctly, but still need their stuff to work. I personally don’t want AI invading my life any further.
That’s exactly the reason why you get good results when prompting a chatbot. You have the knowledge to ask the right questions with the needed keywords and lingo. What’s problematic is that Microslop and big tech in general are advertising AI as a generic tool for everyone and their grandmother. The result is garbage in, garbage out. It’s not going to work as advertised.
Its a admission that it isn’t doing anything useful.
Feels like most trending tech these days. I’m so tired.
I appreciate the social permission for so many folks to switch to Linux. KDE has come a long way.
“Microsoft CEO begs for us to use the software that he’s been shoving down our throats for the last 10 years or so or else his corporation will lose money”
Citizen developers of the world, disband!!
He could set an example by replacing himself with AI
Isn’t it alleged that China goes for specific use cases and not general intelligence?
Maybe that’s the way to go and not the gamble that the US and western companies are doing.
It’s much easier to build an expert ai, you don’t need it to have general knowledge and can feed them data manuals. It takes a lot less processing power and generates much better, accurate and relevant results. It also means there is a set quantity of data the ai can/needs to consume to know everything about x subject.
Think about it like the… The Spotify library is like 350tb, but you won’t ever need all that, exclude all foreign language content,podcasts, and genres you don’t care about and that 350tb can get slimmed down a much more relevant 35tb, specialist ai is kinda like that…
heres something useful, REMOVE AI from all your products, and undo windows10/11 changes.
when they asked permissions?
Brother, AI has proven multiple times to make you stupider. It’s not a cognitive amplifier.
He has my permission to stop.
We’re not replacing workers fast enough.
-This jackass, essentially.
FireWire400@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Dude, you never had "social permission to do this in the first place, none of us asked for this shit. You’re literally destroying the planet and our future for you personal gain. You useless waste of space.