just_another_person
@just_another_person@lemmy.world
- Comment on US appeals court agrees to pause Google app store reform order for now 2 days ago:
…why?
- Comment on Proton releases a new app for two-factor authentication 4 days ago:
I guess it’s kinda nice. They already had this in Proton Pass, but I guess not all accounts have access to that as a bundle maybe?
- Comment on Juggalos Not Happy as Insane Clown Posse Releases AI-Generated Video 4 days ago:
This is not the news I expected to read today…or ever, but I’m here for it!
- Comment on Helion Secures Land and Begins Building on the Site of World’s First Fusion Power Plant 5 days ago:
Same. Have they even done any demos?
- Comment on Samsung’s One UI 8 might shut down bootloader unlocking on Galaxy phones 5 days ago:
- Comment on Samsung’s One UI 8 might shut down bootloader unlocking on Galaxy phones 5 days ago:
Doesn’t this break laws in the EU, JP, and US?
- Comment on Oh My God, TAKE IT DOWN Kills Parody 6 days ago:
Laws still exist for civil suits.
Next.
- Comment on Oh My God, TAKE IT DOWN Kills Parody 6 days ago:
Your post does not cover CIVIL SUITS, which is where this all would lie in the courts.
Trump will lose, open himself up to discovery, and allow an entire binge by legal process into every little part of what is going on right now, which his lawyers will not allow.
I think you’re commenting on something you don’t understand, no offense.
- Comment on Oh My God, TAKE IT DOWN Kills Parody 6 days ago:
Are you out of the loop?
Trump had posted to his own Truth account a week ago an AI generated video of Obama being arrested in the White House.
Are you a fucking bot, or just ignorant?
The way this works in a legal sense is that Trump would be fucking foolish to try and sue a CABLE show (not under FCC purview) that did what he did. Present an obviously fake depiction of something as fact.
Not only will he lose in court because Trump set the precedent for doing so, he will be open to countersuit just because of that fact.
- Comment on Oh My God, TAKE IT DOWN Kills Parody 1 week ago:
While this article is technically correct on some things, it’s somewhat missing the entire point of what Matt and Trey did very intentionally. They want Trump to try and sue them.
Trump has inappropriately promoted and used various AI depictions of some seriously fucked up shit, and therefore would immediately lose in court if trying to sure based on the existing laws. In fact, they never showed Trump’s dick. They just alluded to it being his dick…with AI.
I would FUCKING LOVE for Trump to try and sue them, because Matt and Trey will make it the circus it deserves to be, get some amazing stuff in discovery, and they can fucking afford not only defending themselves and their content from frivolous lawsuits, but then countersue and fuck Trump and all of his cronies up when it comes out who has been pulling the strings with the absolutely batshit insane stuff that gets posted on his accounts, and government accounts being misused in an official capacity to push dogshit.
I look forward to this with a shwaybone.
- Comment on Oncoliruses: LLM Viruses are the future and will be a pest, say good bye to decent tech. 1 week ago:
Copy themselves to what? Are you aware of the basic requirements a fully loaded model needs to even get loaded, let alone run?
This is not how any of this works…
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
He won by a 1.6% margin, buddy.
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
Wow. We got a certified genius here, folks. Somebody get this fool a microphone.
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
We’ve seen this before.
They know how it ends.
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
Apparently you don’t know how a democracy works.
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
Zero presidents have ever lost as much support for anything at any time in the history of this country: www.economist.com/…/trump-approval-tracker
Not only is this a wildly unpopular president, it’s a president who has shed 35-50% of their own voters. It’s proof positive that you are wrong.
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
Yup. That’s never going to fly, and even if it does, that doesn’t mean the Executive all of a sudden gets to start telling private companies how they can and can’t operate according to the law. It’s so stupid.
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
No. America did not, and if you’ve been keeping track, he lost the popular vote by a huge margin the first time (which included insane amounts of election interference), and only “won” by 1.6% the second time, and only because of very specific gerrymandering and hoop jumping.
Saying that’s a clear direction for an entire country is fucking insane. Like if I have $0.51 I might as well have a dollar. It’s just an insane argument.
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
EO’s are policy insofar as they can affect the Executive Branch and what it controls, and nothing else. The history of the use is mainly for “the spirit” of something, but only in the past 20 years or so has been weaponized to be used for trying to attempt to guide actual policy. Never in the way Trump has tried to use them, which is “law by decree”.
The joke is they know it’s bullshit and meaningless. This all happened in his first term. 220 total, 157 shot down in court, 27 revoked. It’s an office memo at best. Biden even tried to do thenstudent debt cancellation through EO, and it got shot down in court.
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
And since you did use the word “policy”, I did mention that EO’s aren’t laws. It’s a memo. He has no control via EOnof anyone except the people in his purview. Not private companies, not researches, not law, not state governments.
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
Friend, seriously…listen to the very clear reason being used to explain the deficiency of your argument here.
The way you phrase something absolutely changes the meaning of its point. You can’t say something and then try to justify that the ends are the same, so it’s cool. Literally why people use the phrase “the ends don’t justify the means”.
If Trump comes out and says some dumb shit, you can’t just say “AMERICA WANTS THIS”, because that is obviously untrue.
It would work the same way with 4 people in a car, and the driver wants hamburgers. The entire car doesn’t want hamburgers, just the driver of the car. How you want to argue the outcome or explanation of that very much decides on how you intend to phrase the situation. All you know right now is that the driver wants a hamburger, so it would disingenuous to say everyone wants hamburgers.
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
I’m arguing that you’re intentionally trying to play semantics with phrasing and claim it doesn’t matter, when it absolutely does, and everyone in here is explaining to you why. That’s all.
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
The phrasing means everything.
Example: “Trump wants…”
VS
Example: “America wants…”
Big difference. Executive Orders are a memo, not law. It’s disturbing that I have to keep saying this and explaining this.
- Comment on America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change 1 week ago:
Again, AMERICA doesn’t want this. This is some dumb shit from a mentally deficient and decrepit old man that somehow got elected under very shady terms by a minority of the country.
- Comment on datacenter liquid cooling solution 1 week ago:
There’s no way you need whatever you’re looking for.
- Comment on US criticizes French inquiry into social media platform X 1 week ago:
That Musk illustration originated here on Lemmy! I wish I could find the original post, but it was an art student who submitted it for something, and posted here for feedback.
- Comment on New Executive Order:AI must agree on the Administration views on Sex,Race, cant mention what they deem to be Critical Race Theory,Unconscious Bias,Intersectionality,Systemic Racism or "Transgenderism 1 week ago:
An Executive Order is not law, and cannot be misconstrued as law.
Example: Trump says solar panels are outlawed. Outcome: Nothing
Example: Trump says no Trans people in sports Outcome: Nothing. In fact, multiple states sued him and won a stay, and if they even attempt to enforce that as law, they are immediately not only breaking the law, but a judicial order, and opening themselves to civil prosecution which they will certainly lose in court.
Example: Trump says some dumb shit about plastic straws Outcome: Everyone using paper straws still using paper straws.
These bullshit decrees are meaningless except to the sheep working for him. They can’t enforce a goddamn thing.
- Comment on New Executive Order:AI must agree on the Administration views on Sex,Race, cant mention what they deem to be Critical Race Theory,Unconscious Bias,Intersectionality,Systemic Racism or "Transgenderism 1 week ago:
No, they can’t. Congress is the body that enacts laws.
- Comment on New Executive Order:AI must agree on the Administration views on Sex,Race, cant mention what they deem to be Critical Race Theory,Unconscious Bias,Intersectionality,Systemic Racism or "Transgenderism 1 week ago:
They are not laws whatsoever. They aren’t anything more but words on a paper. You can’t take it to court and argue that you are complying with an executive order and HAVE to. That’s why they keep losing all of these lawsuits based on EO’s. You can’t just make some shit up and have it fly in court.
- Comment on New Executive Order:AI must agree on the Administration views on Sex,Race, cant mention what they deem to be Critical Race Theory,Unconscious Bias,Intersectionality,Systemic Racism or "Transgenderism 1 week ago:
Lolz. OKAY, BOOMER 👌
These dumbfuckingidiots have zero ideas how anything works, and refuse to even try to understand. Also, apparently nobody told grandpa that Executive Orders are not laws, and are less important than a fucking memo.
God damn fucking embarrassment.