Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Some Reddit users just love to disagree, new AI-powered troll-spotting algorithm finds

⁨321⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Pro@programming.dev⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩

https://theconversation.com/some-reddit-users-just-love-to-disagree-new-ai-powered-troll-spotting-algorithm-finds-255879

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • TerranFenrir@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I disagree.

    source
    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I think you’re wrong.

      source
      • solrize@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Well ackshually…

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • TerranFenrir@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I disagree

        source
    • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      “Then you are banned.” – Redditor Jannie

      source
    • elvith@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Then we agree to disagree

      source
    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It’s not something you can agree or not, it’s a fact!

      source
  • Fizz@lemmy.nz ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Disagreeing isnt trolling. On reddit you see so much stuff that is so plain and agreeable its not worth adding agreeable comment #2000. So it only becomes worth commenting if you see a post where you actually have a disagreement with the majority.

    source
    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Oh, disagreeing with the post, huh? Looks like we found the AI troll, get 'em everyone!

      source
    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      The article is not about normal run of the mill disagreement. It’s about:

      …an entire class of Reddit users whose primary purpose seems to be to disagree with others. These users specifically seek out opportunities to post contradictory comments, especially in response to disagreement, and then move on without waiting for replies.

      source
      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        whose primary purpose seems to be to disagree

        What’s survivor bias again?

        I mean, aside from the thing everyone is saying, to which you’re replying ‘read the article’, that is.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Phen@lemmy.eco.br ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Disagreeing is often treated as trolling by those you disagree with, depending on the subject. Mostly because those disagreements are often bad faith talking points from some groups of people.

      source
      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        The person who identifies disagreement as trolling needs to grow up.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Forming a counter argument is time consuming and requires you to think about the topic.

        Calling someone names and labeling them a “troll” is much easier.

        source
      • Fizz@lemmy.nz ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Repeating bad faith talking points isnt trolling. To me its a perspective issue. What I think is bad faith talking points might be reality to another person.

        source
    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Absolutely. Someone will always disagree and that‘s a good thing, actually. Bubbles are just as if not more problematic than the disagreeing „troll“. Sometimes there are reasons to play devil‘s advocate and sometimes you just bring up concerns that you‘d like to be eliminated.

      I remember when I was part of a tiny minority bringing up concerns over Elon Musk and let me tell you the pushback and ridicule I received IRL was even worse than discourse online at the time. It took a long time until someone came up to me and actually admitted that I was right about Musk the entire time. I just failed to bring my point across earlier because they were better at debating but I like to think I sped up their process of becoming disillusioned about tech billionaires a little bit.

      There‘s also a case where I got temporarily banned from a community I was very active in and labelled as a „right wing troll“ when almost every comment I made on Lemmy pointed to the opposite. A moderator probably had a bad day, read a comment they disagreed with and let the hammer fall down before even doing as little as to check my post history. Not much harm done I guess but man we should learn to embrace other opinions a little more.

      source
      • Phen@lemmy.eco.br ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        If you actually think about things and form your own opinions you’ll usually be treated as “the other side” by everyone who signs and follows any pre-made set of opinions.

        If you hate AI but thinks there is some specific situation in which it doesn’t 100% suck, you’ll be treated as a troll in anti-AI communities. If you’re MAGA but disagrees with anything Trump says, you’ll be called a leftist in conservative circles. If you’re a fierce active defender of LGBTQ+ rights but thinks it’s OK for a white American to dress up as a Mexican character for Halloween, you’ll be ostracized in many left wing groups.

        source
    • TheBlackLounge@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      But this isn’t about people seeking worthwhile debates

      These users specifically seek out opportunities to post contradictory comments, especially in response to disagreement, and then move on without waiting for replies.

      Ah okay but you won’t respond to this.

      source
      • Fizz@lemmy.nz ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        You can post a comment disagreeing and not reply. Not every comment has to be seeking out “worthwhile debates”

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      This is a great point, not sure what kind of bias it is, but you’d literally see thousands of people agreeing (the upvotes) and then 10 people circling around in a knife fight. Did we need science to tell us Reddit is full of trolls? Trolls existed on Reddit before LLMs became popular.

      source
  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    those are the people who no one irl talks to anymore because they impulsively take the opposing stance, regardless of how stupid that stance may be, any time anyone says anything

    source
    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Yup and guess what they are way more vocal online since they can still have an audience there and this is one of the reasons social media sites are so skewed from representing generalizable opinions. It’s a contrarian incubator.

      source
    • Weslee@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I play devil’s advocate in most friend-space conversations, it’s just who I am, I don’t do it disrespectfully (I hope) but it’s just the first thing my brain goes to.

      source
      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        sometimes it’s good to examine things from all angles; i’m mostly talking about people who will start arguing if you say “nice weather today”-- shit gets old quick

        source
    • bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      No they are not

      source
    • SufferingSteve@feddit.nu ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I’m in this comment, and I don’t like it

      source
    • Justas@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I had a colleague like that, he was an electric engineer who was convinced that the Earth is flat and that vaccines are bad.

      source
      • Litebit@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I know that guy he told me he knows of a colleague who was convinced that the earth is spherical and vaccines are great.

        source
    • Devdoggy@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      MAGA??

      source
  • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    no they dont

    source
    • toastmeister@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      That’s not an argent, that’s a contradiction!

      source
      • socsa@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        This is abuse, arguments are down the hall.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • kevin2107@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      BUT

      source
      • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        source?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • rigamarole@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    It’s called being contrarian, and it’s not just Reddit users. I have several family members like this.

    source
    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I’d also argue it’s not necessarily a bad thing. If you’re talking shit be sure you’re able to back it up. I am naturally contrarian but in many cases it’s less about what I feel and more about taking the side of the voice that is missing.

      source
    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Wow this guy really loves to disagree

      source
      • HowAbt2day@futurology.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        No he doesn’t!

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Survivor bias aside, I’m not sure the UI doesn’t make this drive-by trolling worse. The reddit UI (hi Lemmy) is threaded but disjoint, and the excellent response to one tree of responses isn’t useful to or seen in another tree – and those trees will develop in parallel in almost every discussion.

    I worry that quips and cheap takes stand out because they’re fast and block actual discussion more, so have that mock ‘finalising’ effect. Ending a discussion thread is not concluding it .

    … and we all have that cousin whom no one invites anywhere because he’ll argue the shit out of something like a jackal worrying a carcass, until people just give up and let him wander smugly off to his little corner in contrarian triumph.

    source
    • FourWaveforms@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      *whomst

      source
  • capuccino@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Disagreement is a way to promote dialog.

    source
    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      No it isnt

      source
      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Sources?

        /s

        source
    • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It’s also a way to manufacture dissent and foster division.

      source
      • intensely_human@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Is it though? According to the book The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, conflict is a sign of a trusting team, and conflict is a necessity for that team to achieve commitment.

        I can attempt to explain how it it’s unclear

        This graphic is from the book:

        Image

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Godric@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Wrong.

      source
  • Zotora@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    In breaking news; The sky is blue.

    More at 4.

    source
    • samus12345@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Image

      source
      • callouscomic@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I came here for a good argument!

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    There’s something quite funny about making a few replies to people on a topic, doing something else with your life for several hours, then logging back in to a shitstorm. I’ve done it unintentionally a few times.

    source
    • btaf45@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      We’ve all done that. One time I posted something and forgot about it. Came back next day and found the first person to comment completely derailed what I was saying by mischaracterizing it. And then all the replies were about the mischaracterization and there were no replies to the substance of what I actually said.

      source
      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I can definitely sympathise with that.

        source
  • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I have a reddit coworker, he just disagrees and follows up with “fucking retard” while being blatantly wrong…i hope they fire the guy soon.

    Unmanageable human being, impossible to learn anything to keep him from killing himself (my job is technically life threatening, if you’re too stupid to listen)

    He also mamaged to call in sick for 2 weeks in his first 4 weeks of employment, i was surprised when they kept him on after that.

    source
  • Ledericas@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    theres also Bots/ai arguing against other bots to sow dissent.

    source
  • BeefHouse@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Thanks AI… Using tremendous amounts of energy and technology to tell us something that anyone paying attention would have already known

    source
  • intensely_human@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Trolling and disagreeing are not the same thing.

    I am someone who “loves to disagree”, as in most of my engagement on lemmy is disagreeing. But that’s because I speak up when I feel like speaking up is needed, and when I feel like it’s needed is when what I believe is not being said.

    source
  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Disagreeing is not trolling. I hate post where everyone just comments the same thing. It’s has no value, it’s boring.

    When people have different opinions and exchange ideas it gets interesting.

    source
    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      read the article.

      Perhaps our most striking result was finding an entire class of Reddit users whose primary purpose seems to be to disagree with others. These users specifically seek out opportunities to post contradictory comments, especially in response to disagreement, and then move on without waiting for replies.

      source
      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        So if you look at my comment history at Reddit you would find few “totally agree, here’s an upvote” comments and a lot “I totally disagree with this statement” type of comments. Not because I was trolling. I just find “you’re so right” type of comments boring. I don’t know what the “move on without waiting for replies” part implies. Who waits for replies on reddit? Do they mean they just never reply bak? If so that’s also not typical trolling.

        source
  • n3cr0@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    How to get rid of the last few human reddit users … and freedom of speech.

    source
  • Geetnerd@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    But they all agree on one thing:

    “Fuck. Spez.”

    source
    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Apparently not since most of them stuck around. Fuck Reddit.

      source
      • Geetnerd@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        You must have missed where they culled a lot Musk and Trump critics.

        source
    • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      No u.

      source
  • 800XL@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    This is one of those stupid articles that are like “water is wet says a new study” and far more people than it should be say “holy fuck it’s wet when I wash things. It must mean I wash things with water. Omgomgomgomg!!”

    No shit users are trolls on reddit.

    source
  • antisocialite@lemmy.today ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    In other news, water is wet.

    source
    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      No it’s not. You are.

      source
  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    This post feels like bait

    source
    • intensely_human@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Dude your mom feels like bait

      source
  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Some people while cleaning a table just love to scratch it a bit. Why not leave that fossilized fat stain alone.

    Same vibes. There’s no use in agreeing. You are just adding to a clueless crowd.

    Disagreeing helps everyone.

    source
  • Tungsten5@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Thats not true

    source
  • kandoh@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Yeah i enjoy arguing online

    source
  • ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I mean if you’re on r/star wars or a political subreddit, then yeah lol.

    source
  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I’ve been online since 1995. And back in those days, about the worst argument people had was Star Wars vs Star Trek. That’s because the general online population at that time valued fact-based discussion and proper sources. Not like today, where someone’s feelings seem to trump actual fact.

    If I post 1+1=2 with proper sources, some idiot is bound to come along to argue that 1+1=tomato soup, that the moon is made of aged brie and that 5G on phones is turning frogs gay. It’s exhausting.

    There’s simply too many blithering idiots online who reject facts. And unfortunately instead of blocking them, people engage. Thus giving them incentive to keep doing it.

    source
  • Doomsider@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I just call it out immediately and shut people down. I spend countless hours researching and reading and I don’t have time for devil’s advocates anymore. Here on Lemmy I will just block them and in real life I just tell them homie I don’t play that.

    source
  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    It’s called a dialectic.

    source
  • Lyrl@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Bizarre to have a headline claiming five “types” were identified, but then only describe the behavior of a single type. What are the other four?

    source
  • Aurix@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    This should be illegal. As a person who was once false flagged manually by network attribution. Of course the anti troll flagging network was itself socially destroyed by time and is frequently cause of scandals while nobody cares for me.

    Add certain language patterns and political stances and you have an excellent oppressive tool.

    The behavior the study is referring to, is actually result of reddit’s algorithms and human psychology. Often the contrarian view of whatever the post is about will automatically float to the top, no matter the topic, opinionated, factual or debunking, nature.

    source
  • Jax@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    They’re here too

    source
  • Litebit@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Playing Devil’s Advocate. has been around way before the internet.

    source
-> View More Comments