Jax
@Jax@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on Bottom of the Ocean 2 days ago:
A small lump of metal, glass, bone and maybe a little goopie bits if they got trapped does not elicit the same mental image.
- Comment on Never change, Internet. Check out his new title 4 days ago:
The only thing I hoped for in that match was for Tyson to smack the living shit out of Jake. That would have been the best outcome. That being said it was never going to end as anything other than Jake running around the ring.
Every single one of these “old vs young” fights is only meant to drive conversation about boxing. It’s a marketing ploy, not only that it’s working. Incredibly well. To say that Jake Paul is the face of boxing is not an understatement. It is a sad indication of where the sport has fallen.
That being said, they still fucking hit each other. Call it a hard sparring match, whatever. Barrios vs Ramos was solid.
- Comment on Never change, Internet. Check out his new title 5 days ago:
It’s only staged in the sense that it’s a 27 year old boxing a 58 year old. They still hit each other, it’s not like the punches were fake.
- Comment on Respect 2 weeks ago:
Because they aren’t interested in the flowers, they’re interested in how they look with the flowers all around them. It’s a selfish act for vain individuals.
- Comment on Respect 2 weeks ago:
I think we can assume that this is spring/early summer, but yeah - you aren’t wrong. I can’t see myself enjoying grass between my toes if I have to shove my bare feet through a meter of snow.
- Comment on Respect 2 weeks ago:
Very common, at least here in California, for there to be nice blooms of flowers that people decide to obliterate so they can take pictures for social media. By the time the 80th troglodyte traipses through the flowers, they’ve ruined it for everyone else that might enjoy them - and the flowers are fucked.
I can almost guarantee that this is the point of the comic. The only other interpretation I’ve seen that I can accept is that it’s actually about the grass between your toes, which some people dislike.
- Comment on Respect 2 weeks ago:
I mean, I like the feeling of grass between my toes.
- Comment on Respect 2 weeks ago:
Few people understand why I glare them after obliterating a perfectly nice patch of flowers.
- Comment on I hate that that happens 3 weeks ago:
“It is true that that’s almost never necessary.”
I can’t wrap my head around this, logically it’s still a ‘double that’ but the short form makes it palatable to read/say.
- Comment on World of Warcraft adds $90 mount to in game store 3 weeks ago:
Crazy how I just detailed this exact thing in a different comment and got downvoted for it.
- Comment on World of Warcraft adds $90 mount to in game store 3 weeks ago:
5 million gold costs about 220 bucks right now. If I’m not mistaken that was the price of the AH mount back in BFA, no?
90 bucks for this mount is actually at a massive bargain, we’re talking 40% of what it’s actually worth. Like I get it, you think it’s scummy but… idk, if I still played WoW I would probably buy it - and I doubt I would regret it. That being said, I do not play anymore and will not come back for the mount lol.
Like, technically speaking they could charge double what they’re asking and it would still be cheaper than the BFA AH mount.
- Comment on Return to office perks 1 month ago:
Coffee infused hot dog. Yeah, I’ve thought about it and that’s fucking awful.
- Comment on That explains it. 1 month ago:
Your thoughts are dirty and you should feel ashaned you disgusting sinner!
Or something, idk they might as well be religious
- Comment on That explains it. 1 month ago:
I imagine men will start behaving differently right around the time your head becomes unlodged from your ass.
Showing yourself in public ≠ posting pictures of yourself online. I understand that, for the terminally online, these things are interchangeable. I am sorry to inform you of this, but it’s probably valuable that you learn it now, they are not.
This isn’t victim blaming. This is cause and effect.
- Comment on That explains it. 1 month ago:
How fucking dare that creepy disgusting old man look at pictures of young, beautiful women on a platform where they’re posting pictures of themselves! This isn’t what the internet is meant for, how dare he!
Hmm
- Comment on Slapping Chicken 2 months ago:
You can’t cook chicken with math, it’s out of this guys wheelhouse
- Comment on Venom vs Poison 2 months ago:
Hmm, I was going to say there’s a chance you survive biting lava - but technically there’s also a chance you survive biting something poisonous.
So yeah, flawless logic. The most poisonous and venemous things happen to be the pure unbridled power of the earth and 900lbs of muscle and hungry.
- Comment on Regain Control in my ass 2 months ago:
Squelch in my ass
- Comment on Climate scientists flee Twitter as hostility surges 2 months ago:
Disastrous, even
- Comment on Research shows more than 80% of AI projects fail, wasting billions of dollars in capital and resources: Report 2 months ago:
It’s a circle jerk, don’t get fooled into thinking this is some new version of trickly down economics
- Comment on "It's scary"- Scientists finding mounting evidence of plastic pollution in human organs 2 months ago:
Yes, oil and it’s byproducts are indeed a blight on the world. At least the way we use them, anyway.
- Comment on Health food 2 months ago:
You mean to say it’s stigmatized as a bad thing, and I’d accept that.
There’s an apple called Cosmic Crisp that has to be the worst thing I’ve seen come from the Honeycrisp variant of apple. Genuinely just awful taste and texture, like it’s got sand in it.
That being said, these are only a problem at supermarkets. Farmers markets are hard carries and don’t typically have the ‘grown for shelf life’ produce you see at your typical Walmart.
- Comment on California auto insurance costs set to rise by 54%, new report says 2 months ago:
Just breathe better, god how simple do you need it to be? /s
- Comment on Deepfake of Elon musk, Bitcoin Scam running on Youtube 2 months ago:
When trying to scam people, why pick something that they will believe?
I think you answered your own question
- Comment on Scratch that. Let's do an airstrike instead. 3 months ago:
Purge the bowels, cleanse the soul
- Comment on Ah sweet! 3 months ago:
Idk, I don’t think they’re that blurry if we compare them to similar “conundrums” in other unethical circumstances.
Like, would you think the same of someone owning child porn? They don’t distribute it, they don’t film the children themselves, they just own the recordings. The law says they’re a criminal, but it seems like a similar ethical conundrum - no? (To be clear, I think eating meat sourced from someone who did not consent is wrong. I hope that says enough about how I feel about CP.)
How about owning the schematics for a ghost gun? You haven’t printed it, you haven’t distributed the schematic - you just own the schematic (and, for the purpose of the example, a 3d printer capable of printing the parts needed).
Seems like the answer is “it’s unethical”. Gonna need a third party to weigh in.
- Comment on It's OK, Yellowstone 3 months ago:
Unless you’re on the volcano, that death will be a very slow one.
- Comment on Ah sweet! 3 months ago:
Unethical??
- Comment on Scratch that. Let's do an airstrike instead. 3 months ago:
I feel very badly for your poor colon.
- Comment on Only Honk 3 months ago:
It’s like I’m having a stroke, but without the smell of burnt toast.