The answer should be fairly obvious to anyone who’s looked at an European map, there’s a reason why the oldest cities are always around or near rivers. Also humans had bottle-like technologies since essentially forever, it’s probably one of the first tools to be developed after “pointy stick”.
How do you think early humans survived without water bottles? Did they just live next to water sources all the time?
Submitted 1 day ago by sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone to nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
Comments
Nibodhika@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Zenith@lemm.ee 13 hours ago
The “bell beaker” people and culture is a fun rabbit hole for anyone interested in ancient water carrying technologies
SirDankbud@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
You know the smell dirt makes when its wet? It’s called petrichor and humans can smell it better than sharks smell blood in the water. It is detectable by the human nose at 0.4 parts per BILLION. This gave early humans a huge advantage in finding water when needed. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrichor
grte@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Get dunked on, sharks.
Smeagol666@lemm.ee 1 day ago
I was trying to think of that word just a few days ago when I went outside and could smell that a storm was coming, then my ADHD kicked in an I forgot about it.
Diddlydee@feddit.uk 1 day ago
There is an Indian perfume base called Mitti Attar which tries to replicate this smell. It’s like damp moss at first scent, then develops into rain on hot sand. It is entrancing. Proper Mitti Attar sells for thousands and takes years to make.
Revan343@lemmy.ca 16 hours ago
Literally called dirtblood, I love it
PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 day ago
For the most part, yes, at least on a large scale. Proximity to a water source was pretty much a requirement for developments for most of history.
On the smaller side of things, other commenters have already mentioned that we had ways to store water before bottles existed.
Nefara@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yes, humans used to live much closer to water sources. On a town level, if you didn’t have a creek or river nearby you just didn’t settle there. Available water was absolutely necessary for domestic animals, cooking, washing, and of course drinking. On a personal level, you would go in the morning to a central well or water source and gather your water you would need for the day. Depending on the household needs it might be multiple trips with heavy, full vessels. You would put the water in to household water vessels, like a basin for cleaning or a ewer for washing or your cook pot. If you were thirsty at home, you would take a dipper (basically a ladle) and take some water from the household supply.
Where did you get the impression we didn’t used to have water bottles? They weren’t made of plastic or metal but humans have carried water with them for probably as long as we’ve used tools. You can carry water in drinking horns, in clay pots, wooden buckets, in dried out animal bladders or leather skeins, and there’s literally a type of gourd called a “bottle gourd” which has been dried out and used as a personal water bottle for milennia across any region that can grow them. Don’t underestimate human ingenuity, we didn’t always have access to the same technology and materials but we have always been able to problem solve.ICastFist@programming.dev 17 hours ago
Adding to this, some plants and fruits have high water content (watermelons and some cacti), so you could keep your body hydrated without drinking water. For hunter-gatherers, who could likely be on the move away from water sources, this knowledge was crucial.
More interestingly, baobabs, huge “fat” trees found throughout the African continent, can be used as water tanks
seven_phone@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Everyone has sippy bottles now but when I was young in the late 70s we played out all day and did not drink for 7 hours at a time and no one died. Alright one person died but mainly not.
czardestructo@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
My wife won’t leave the house without several water containers as it she is crossing the god damn Sahara. We live in the North East, its not even dry! I always ask her how she survied childhood without stupid fancy bottles that are marketed. Fortunately she is patient with my crap and loves me…
medgremlin@midwest.social 5 hours ago
I do this now and didn’t have to as a kid…however, I have a weird kidney problem where my kidneys will just dump water, whether or not I have the water to spare. This means that I have a minimum water requirement of 4 liters a day. It’s not as bad as when I was on a really horrible medication that started the whole issue. When I was on that medication I had to drink about 4 gallons of water a day.
End result: I have a stupid party trick where I can down a liter of fluid in about 10 seconds, and a gallon of fluid in about 5 to 10 minutes depending on how recently I’ve eaten. (I did give myself water poisoning once, but that took 8 gallons over about 14 hours)
ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
I know it’s hard to believe, but in a majority of places on Earth, water is readily available.
bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
I think it’s more accurate to say that water is readily available in places where humans are likely to go. Because, you know, humans don’t tend to go where there is no water.
abbadon420@lemm.ee 1 day ago
For now
Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
(Evil Nescafe laughter): Muahahaha!
Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Most of the water on earth isn’t drinkable, it’s salt water.
HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Was
Kolanaki@pawb.social 23 hours ago
You know how many things you can just find on the ground that are hollow and can hold water? Even without making shit like a waterskin, humans had ways of containing liquids to travel with.
K1nsey6@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
TiL that I’m early human. 1970s baby, but early human
Iunnrais@lemm.ee 13 hours ago
I suspect they’d include “cups, glasses, canteens, water skins, etc” in the category of “water bottles”. :p
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 hours ago
Pretty much yes. If you look at a map, you’ll notice that most cities, especially old (like old old) ones are next to or near water sources. There are, of course, other reasons for this as well: building a settlement by water will also give you the opportunity to use boats, for transportation and shipping. Merchant cities tend to be by seas and oceans, because transporting cargo by ships is much more efficient than by land, especially before airplanes. Then there’s fishing, crop irrigation, and just that humans like bodies of water.
But also, what do you exactly mean by water bottle? Because water transportation and storage vessels have been around for quite a while, and aqueducts have been built by various civilisations across history.
Poojabber@lemmy.world 1 day ago
We had water bottles way before plastic… we used wood, mud, clay, stone, and animal parts to store water before recorded history…
Dasus@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Really?
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterskin
Also, there was an ice age. Not everyone lives in scorching climates. Theres fresh water around me 247/365. As waterskins are somewhat recent probably, in terms of evolutionary history.
Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Going backwards in time, they had metal and brass containers, before that they had wooden buckets and barrels, ceramic pots, carved out animal parts or fruit of plants.
Before farming, probably a good portion of the water early people subsisted on was from the food they ate. (Berries and fruit, fish, meat, etc.) Water might pool around rocky areas after rain, even if there was no stream nearby in a pinch.
TimewornTraveler@piefed.social 1 day ago
getting water used to be a daily chore. ever hear that song "jack and jill went up the hill to fetch a pail of water?" or see the old kung fu movies where they train running water up staircases?
Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Or in areas of Africa where that is still a daily chore
sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Monk life is hard work!
queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
You ever notice how every other animal manages to survive without water bottles? It was like that for most of human existence, before we figured out water skins and wooden cups and clay jugs.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 day ago
For the most part, yes. That is why they tended to congregate around water sources. Even early settlements and towns and cities were near waters sources even after we had portable water containers because water is heavy and large numbers of people need a large water source.
But before we changed the environment significantly, there were a lot more potable water sources. More streams, more water pooled up after rains, etc. that could be ingested because of a lack of human pollution. If humans were within a days walking distance of a water source, they could do their hunting and gathering nearby and drink up afterwards.
xylogx@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Humans sweat. It is one of our superpowers and enables endurance hunting. Anthropologists theorize that early humans would have had to have developed water carrying technologies for this to be viable. They study primitive hunter gathers who still practice endurance hunting and they use water skins during the hunt.
sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
That is super cool!
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 1 day ago
Dehydration is but a secondary concern as you’re being chased by a sabertooth tiger.
Sidhean@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Do you think you could run further or not as far while dehydrated?
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Further if there was a sabertooth tiger chasing me
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Pots
remon@ani.social 1 day ago
Animal bladders and other organs were used as protable water containers very early on.
DrFistington@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Or things like gourds
Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I was just gonna say, a squash that I cut in half, hollow out and dry is pretty low-tech stuff. Could probably use a coconut if you were in a pinch… Lot of options.
egrets@lemmy.world 1 day ago
And skins, tanned, stitched, and treated with resin. Pottery is also an ancient skill.