Notably absent… the explosives.
But sure, if you are wondering how folks out in Yemen or Gaza managed to retaliate against their oppressors for so long, this is a textbook example of how and why. What’s being proposed is collection of technology we’ve had since at least the 1960s that’s slowly made its way into civilian circulation.
Also…
Khojayev’s just-launched prototype has no effectiveness track record
I mean, we’re seeing what “just-launched prototypes with no effective track record” have accomplished on the Ukraine-Russia front-lines and it’s a decidedly mixed bag.
I think a harder question to answer is “Who would be interested in putting one of these into practical use?” And that gets to the real value-add of a Stinger MANPAD. Namely, the humans willing and practiced enough to use it.
slackj_87@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Great… can’t wait for politicians to use this as a way to pass “common sense” legislation banning 3D printers.
Janx@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Aren’t they already doing that due to their hysteria over “ghost” guns?
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
I learned from Mario that ghosts can only harm you if you look away.
teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Trying to yes. I think it’s model legislation, probably ALEC bs, if I recall CA tried to pass it and hasn’t yet. Maybe a year back.
Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Well, that’s the excuse at least. The law would have to effectively kill 3D printing. Is that the goal? Idk.
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
The kind that can be better made with $20 and a trip to home depot?
Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
But what about real guns?
Oh, those ate okay.
HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
And just like age verification it’s useless because one can build a 3d printer out of an old VCR and a hot glue gun.
Dettweiler42@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
They’re already trying that in New York and California, unfortunately. “Any 3D printer capable of printing parts for firearms” was the verbage, from what I recall.
teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
They already are over 3d guns, this will send them ballistic. They want every printer to keep a record of everything they’ve printed. Model legislation, I think CA tried and so far failed to pass it.
Samskara@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
You don’t need to ban 3D printers. Restrictions and licensing requirements for making, using, owning rockets and guidance software are enough.
chocrates@piefed.world 3 weeks ago
His guidance is just wifi cameras talking to it. Not sure it even is using gps.
To ban stuff like this you have to ban a lot of useful tech
Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
This already would fall under an FFL license for legal citizens anyway. As is the nature of the internet though, this open design will be preserved and available for those who seek it.
aquovie@lemmy.cafe 2 weeks ago
3D printers are even less useful here though. The rocket bit can be replaced with a cardboard tube and some balsa fins. The important parts are the active control and circuitry.
But I guess logic doesn’t really enter into the conversation anyway.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
LOL. Like they “ban” some guns?.
Printers are not hard to assemble from parts.
Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I wonder if there is some archive or torrent for STL files, like an archive of thingiverse or something. Would be nice to archive that just in case.
riskable@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
It’s that even necessary? Anyone with a CAD tool can recreate the 3D printed parts from a glance and a few specs.
It’s literally a tube. Which—to be fair—is a “weapon of mass destruction” according to President Bush (the other war criminal president).
angband@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Just download the code from github and make a torrent: github.com/…/MANPADS-System-Launcher-and-Rocket