Why did UI’s turn from practical to form over function?
E.g. Office 2003 vs Microsoft 365
It’s easy to remember where everything is with a toolbar and menu bar, which allows access to any option in one click and hold move.
Seriously? Big ribbon and massive padding wasting space, as well as the ribbon being clunky to use.
Why did this happen?
satanmat@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Funny story, before they did the 2007 redesigns, they asked users what they wanted to be added; 95% said features that were already in Office.
The Ribbon was designed to make features more findable.
Alas.
BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
The ribbon is one thing, the flat design and obfuscating tools/settings are a far bigger issue.
robotica@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’ve used Office 2003, 2007, 2010 etc. all the way up to 365 not for work purposes, but just happened to have interacted with all of the versions.
I have to say, I seriously don’t know what happened, but Office 2003-2007 feels the most stable and least clunky versions of Office (at least Word) in terms of basic word processing.
I learned how to properly edit and format text in Word in university in a way that I could, without fail, reproduce almost any text design you could think of. When I was learning it on Office 2007 I believe, everything was so stable and predictable. Now when somebody asks me to format some text with 365, the styles functionality continually keeps bugging out and doing stupid shit that I basically can’t recover from unless I create a blank file.
In conclusion, Office 2007 > 365
/rant
mPony@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Same, but for Excel.
Also, JFC the save menu in Office 365 is Cthulhu-level madness.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Am I wrong, or isn’t Office 365 a web app? Not really a 1:1 comparison.