Buffalox
@Buffalox@lemmy.world
- Comment on The U.S. is interested in acquiring machine-learning technology to carry out AI-generated propaganda campaigns overseas. 1 hour ago:
I just gave you an example of immensely important intelligence that was given to USA from Denmark during the cold war. And you ask if I ever heard about it!
You are insane, I have hereby blocked you. Seek help. - Comment on The U.S. is interested in acquiring machine-learning technology to carry out AI-generated propaganda campaigns overseas. 1 hour ago:
How do you imagine it’s the EU responsibility to protect USA against Russian interference? That simply doesn’t make any sense at all.
USA is supposed to be the “intelligence” superpower, having facilities spread out among allies, and I know for a fact my own country has helped USA a lot on intelligence. and is a 7 eyes member. We were also the ones warning about nuclear weapons being on the way to Cuba back in the 60’s. And we have allowed US military on Greenland.Why would we know more about Russian interference than USA themselves? But apart from that the Steele Dossier was from UK, and it clearly indicated Trump is a Russian asset, but the Americans have ignored ALL proof that Trump is obviously compromised, and elected him not just once but twice.
One more insane comment like the 2 before and I block you.
- Comment on The U.S. is interested in acquiring machine-learning technology to carry out AI-generated propaganda campaigns overseas. 2 hours ago:
when the EU has done fuck all to help prevent what’s happened to it.
Oh boy the ignorance of that statement is so big I don’t even know where to begin.
First of all the cooperation of 28 countries to prevent war among themselves is far from not doing jack shit. Secondly EU has worked hard to avoid war through cooperation, but not as much militarily to end them. But still most European countries have been at the side of USA when they asked for it.I’m sorry, your narrow ignorant perspective is simply not a level I really care to debate at.
- Comment on The U.S. is interested in acquiring machine-learning technology to carry out AI-generated propaganda campaigns overseas. 2 hours ago:
They absolutely are, they are still pandering to wall street, but they are not fascist they believe in democracy, and they don’t undermine allies, they don’t plan to take health care away from Americans, and on average they are not nearly as corrupt as the Republicans.
Claiming there is no difference is decidedly moronic and harmful to progress in USA, and part of the problem USA is in.
- Comment on The U.S. is interested in acquiring machine-learning technology to carry out AI-generated propaganda campaigns overseas. 2 hours ago:
It is not Europe that is alienating USA, it’s the other way around. Apparently USA believe they don’t need allies, because they are acting hostile against allies, while being extremely friendly to Russia.
Neither USA or EU stand a chance against China alone, we need to cooperate, but USA is not cooperating they are being confrontational and undermining EU and just about every other ally even Canada which for decades has been the closest ally to USA, and helped USA every single time USA called for it. So has Denmark, yet USA threaten to take Greenland!! - Comment on The U.S. is interested in acquiring machine-learning technology to carry out AI-generated propaganda campaigns overseas. 3 hours ago:
Absolutely, they already do in USA, but the rest of the world is more complex with a multitude of different local conditions to exploit, and requires way more work, so AI would be an even bigger help for making US propaganda for foreign countries.
If they were planning on “attacking” Russia that has been extremely hostile themselves, I wouldn’t have a problem. But Trump is looking to attack traditional allies and is making them enemies!!
Most of Europe already no longer consider USA a reliable ally! And Trump continues to make it worse.
- Comment on The U.S. is interested in acquiring machine-learning technology to carry out AI-generated propaganda campaigns overseas. 3 hours ago:
We just have to accept that USA under Republicans is a hostile country, and try to take precautions.
- Comment on How a hacker helped win a wrongful death lawsuit against Tesla 15 hours ago:
In fascism friends help friends, until they stab them in the back, if it will help them get ahead.
- Comment on The US government could get even more Intel stock if the company ends up losing control of its chip manufacturing business 16 hours ago:
Intel has been clearly less reliable than AMD the past few generations, and from what I’ve seen on current gen, for similar performance in gaming Intel uses twice the power.
If you can get Intel dirt cheap, it may be an OK option, if you are on a tight budget. If it’s for gaming, the focus should be mostly on the GPU. - Comment on China turns on giant neutrino detector that took a decade to build 20 hours ago:
No sorry, I have to wait for the video. 👍
- Comment on China turns on giant neutrino detector that took a decade to build 1 day ago:
Very impressive. 👍 😀
- Comment on Tesla sales plunge 40% in Europe as Chinese EV rival BYD's triple 1 day ago:
Per capita is the measure that counts, why should Americans be allowed to put multiple times more CO2 into the air than other people?
- Comment on Tesla sales plunge 40% in Europe as Chinese EV rival BYD's triple 1 day ago:
I am discussing why China is dominating the EV market in Europe.
They are not, VW group is. China market share was very tiny, and is now growing. And Tesla has collapsed.
But the big winners are mostly European, and then Hyundai/KIA, and now Toyota has finally made a good BEV, so they will increase their BEV marketshare too of course. - Comment on Tesla sales plunge 40% in Europe as Chinese EV rival BYD's triple 1 day ago:
E: holy shit, the Lemmy tankies are real
Nope, you are just wrong. I guarantee you I’m not a tankie, but I think it’s pretty clear that USA has absolutely also subsidized electric cars, especially Tesla that has been generously subsidized in multiple ways, also subsidizing their charging network.
On top of that, USA has prevented a lot of outside competition with tariffs.All in all i am personally sick and tired of Americans always pointing fingers at the Chinese for doing the exact same thing Americans are doing.
- Comment on OpenAI Says It's Scanning Users' ChatGPT Conversations and Reporting Content to the Police 2 days ago:
How do I kill the kill switch?
- Comment on Are we truly on the verge of the humanoid robot revolution? 2 days ago:
We are one day closer today than we were yesterday, and if on the verge means 10 to 20 years, then maybe we are. But I’m pretty sure it’s not happening within 10 years.
Unless humanoid robots working in packaging industries is considered a revolution. - Comment on Our Channel Could Be Deleted - Gamers Nexus 4 days ago:
I addressed this. Bloomberg must press actual legal charges for the takedown to stand,
Why then did you continue to claim: “the copyright strike got reverted and the video restored.” ?
YouTube is basically saying to Bloomberg: yeah, we are ruling that this is not infringement,
No they are not, because the decision stands unless Bloomberg doesn’t take further action.
Notice the take down notice according to Bloomberg themselves ,was not a mistake made by some form of automation. It was a manually reviewed take down notice by Bloomberg specifically against the video.
Also notice that such a take down notice result in a 100% guaranteed 10 day take down of the video, silencing it for 10 days, where even if restored after 10 days will only receive a fraction of the original views due to the YouTube algorithm not presenting it.So the Silence part is 100% true and not clickbait as you claim.
IF Bloomberg chooses to pursue the issue in court, the take down will stand even though it is obviously made in bad faith. This is very contrary to your claim that it’s already lifted which it is NOT!
that is still only 1 copyright strike
You keep claiming that, as if it has any real relevance. And as if you know how many of these they receive on average, and completely disregarding how easy it is to make a DMCA take down claim, and disregarding how these claims take down channels even when they are obviously not valid.
One aspect of how insane the YouTube practices are on handling these is described here:
reddit.com/…/youtube_gave_me_a_copyright_strike_f…So now if you would care to consider the motivation for the take down, which we don’t know for sure, but we do have some circumstantial evidence.
The video was about AI chips used in China that China is not supposed to have access to.
The AI market in China is a $30+ billion per year market for Nvidia. So obviously Nvidia is not interested in it being disclosed about how their chips are sold to China despite being sanctioned.
Also notice that Nvidia is Bloombergs biggest customer. And Bloomberg made a similar video to the one Gamers Nexus made, but where Bloomberg found nothing,Now consider a billion dollar market is at stake, and Nvidia probably spend more than the total value of Gamers Nexus at Bloomberg per month. How big do you think Gamers Nexus is in that context? They are as I described small, it’s like a mouse fighting an rhino.
Now if Nvidia want that video blocked more than 10 days, they can easily have Bloomberg continue their frivolous claim, and have other allies post take down notices against Gamers Nexus and have the channel closed. It’s actually insane how easy it is, because Google seems to almost always side with the bigger player, probably because it’s the cheapest solution requiring the fewest lawyers.
So the threat to close the channel is absolutely there. And the only real protection Gamers Nexus has is the Streisand effect. Legally they can practically do next to nothing. If Bloomberg decides to, they can squash Gamers Nexus like a bug with little effort. If you really can’s see that you are very naive.
- Comment on Our Channel Could Be Deleted - Gamers Nexus 4 days ago:
Good on New York, and good to hear.
- Comment on Our Channel Could Be Deleted - Gamers Nexus 4 days ago:
I did and edited my comment, adding more false claims doesn’t make you right.
- Comment on Our Channel Could Be Deleted - Gamers Nexus 4 days ago:
How the hell isn’t it?
Because it is true, the channel could be deleted, and it was an obvious attempt by Bloomberg to silence him, which he shows many reason for why they may want to do in the video.
When it is true it is not clickbait.
- Comment on Our Channel Could Be Deleted - Gamers Nexus 4 days ago:
Where did I claim Gamers Nexus is above using click bait!
Very clearly it isn’t here, and the amount of downvotes you received for claiming it, hints that most don’t agree with you.
So maybe it’s not so much me, as it is you making an unreasonable claim.Also I don’t see you provide a single argument for your statement, while I actually explain how it is not click bait, because the threat is real.
- Comment on Our Channel Could Be Deleted - Gamers Nexus 4 days ago:
That is true, but a million dollars can be gone in no time, if a multi billion dollar company decides you need to be gone.
1 million dollars is far from enough to run a high profile copyright lawsuit.This case is simple, so they will probably manage that pretty easily, there is basically no way Bloomberg can win. It’s just a typical harassment tactic that will work against by far the most smaller outlets. But Steve is smart, he knows bullshit when he sees it, and he is not easily scared.
- Comment on Our Channel Could Be Deleted - Gamers Nexus 5 days ago:
So how many take down claims have been put against them? How many did they successfully resolve?
IDK, and if you don’t either, you are making an argument from ignorance. - Comment on Our Channel Could Be Deleted - Gamers Nexus 5 days ago:
That is an absolute bullshit claim.
Bloomberg has 10 days to file for lawsuit against Gamers Nexus. If they do, the take down stands, and it’s a strike until Gamers Nexus may win the case. Which will be expensive.
Gamers Nexus cannot manage if a big company like Bloomberg goes all in. They can easily bankrupt a small channel like Gamers Nexus with frivolous lawsuits. And if you are bankrupt, you can’t defend yourself.
- Comment on Our Channel Could Be Deleted - Gamers Nexus 5 days ago:
Bloomberg has 10 days to file for lawsuit against Gamers Nexus. If they do, the take down stands, and it’s a strike until Gamers Nexus may win the case. Which will be expensive.
- Comment on U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector 6 days ago:
OK that could have been stated more clearly, but why should I be against Intel, because USA has used Cisco for spying?
That’s exactly the kind of stupid accusations without evidence I’m tired of USA making against China. Obviously the same standard goes the other way too.
- Comment on U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector 1 week ago:
Can you not see the crazy smiley? It was sarcasm, but OK I’ll add the /S.
- Comment on U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector 1 week ago:
Yes but contrary to China, USA doesn’t use government subsidies to promote their own industries, or state owned companies to spy on the rest of the world. 🤪
I hope Intel survives because a Chinese (mainland+Taiwan) monopoly will not be good, but I am so sick of American disinformation regarding China.
- Comment on MIT report: 95% of generative AI pilots at companies are failing 1 week ago:
Correct, not all things that matter are positive.,
- Comment on MIT report: 95% of generative AI pilots at companies are failing 1 week ago:
The same was true for YouTube in the beginning, they operated at a loss, and when people were hooked on the service, they monetized it.