Submitted 1 year ago by jazzynuovelle@lemmy.world to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
She obviously uses controversy to generate rage-based traffic. By sharing this shit literally ALL you are doing is giving her the attention she wants, because in return you get a little piece of that rage-based traffic and your pointless internet number goes up. Congrats, you’re part of the problem.
In at least one of the scandinavian countries, they actually do that. Your fine is expressed in a point system instead of a fixed amount and forwarded to the tax office, And then the tax office fines you based on your income. Which led to a 6-digit fine for a speeding driver some years ago.
It’s Finland you’re thinking of
(which as an aside is not a part of Scandinavia, but is a part of the Nordics)
Switzerland and Belgium too as far as I can see.
This is from memory but I think the 6-digit guy did some creative accounting too in order to pay less tax in his home country but that also inflated last years income which is what they used to fine him. He was very mad.
Good
I think looking like that is punishment enough.
Commenting on appearances is ugly.
If it was her natural appearance, I would agree, but her appearance is clearly not natural. She made the choice to look like that, and we have every right to criticize such a poor decision.
Bit of a tangent, but what I find interesting about this lady, is that I don't know if she's 50 or 20. These pictures are photoshopped, but other pictures of her and her skin looks really rough.
She's clearly a heavy smoker, tans a lot, and has had plenty of plastic surgery, so I have no clue.
Oh, she is totally 50.
Learned nothing in those 50 years tho, apparently
Fines that are based on net-worth are even better. That way rich people with lots of assets (and little income) still get fined an appropriate amount.
That’s a lot easier to evade, though. How much gold does Ron have buried around town?
Did Ron draws us a treasure map? Is it buried under a big T?
Yeah, I would just love filling out those forms…
Her Lips look likes she’s got them permanently pressed against glass.
I try to not judge people and respect their choices, but looking at her Botox job makes me extremely uncomfortable. Like an uncanny valley.
If she’s happy with it though, what can I say. Not the worst part about her.
nah, it’s okay to judge when they look like this. she did it to herself.
I’d love to know the percentage of the population who thinks this is hideous. Why women do this to their lips is beyond comprehension for me. Presumably it’s to make themselves more attractive but I’ve never heard anyone that thinks it is more attractive.
Body dismorphia that compounds itself is sad to see in action.
What’s wrong with her mouth? Beekeeper?
Retard.
do aussies still use the R-slur?
fish*
You’re not supposed to inject the silicone into the brain.
Holy shit… That is one disgusting primate…
Who is this thing gross thing, yuck
No. No don’t do that.
Don’t give it more power
She looks flammable.
I always thought plastic just melts.
No it burns pretty easily too. I wouldn’t recommend trying it though, if you inhale too much of the smoke you might end up looking like this “woman”.
Shoutout to Finland!
Hey, Finland is just one of several coutries using dayfines:
Germany, Denmark (partly), Finland, Macau, Sweden and Switzerland.
The UK tried it, but it was unpopular, the US has experimented with it, but currently only Oklahoma has taken steps to implement it.
“but it was unpopular”
Eh… Yeah? That’s the point?
There are more than that.
Source: we use them and we're not on that list. Kinda weird that Macau snuck in there before us, honestly. Maybe because here there are hard amount caps and in practice the system is used more as a tool to update fine amounts at intervals than as a hard math way to relate to income? I don't know if that ends up being the case in other places applying the system.
Did she face fuck a hornets nest then swallow two old basketballs in the panicked aftermath?
Anthropomorphic garbage scow.
I do support some sort of income based fines, but at the same time if this is applied to everyone what’s stopping the system from screwing the average person out of more money than the current fines price. There needs to be a set income that matches the current fine prices like 100k equals the current price of tickets and anyone under gets a smaller fine and anyone above pays more based on whatever %. The hard part here would be what do you do with people who do not have income? This applies to both poor and rich people, for rich people it’s normally due to only 1 person in the marriage that works and the other person files separately. Do we allow these fines to be applied to both people’s income if married? What about if they are not married? And how much do we charge poor people for these fines with no income? Just the lower rate like a default 50k range fine?
IMO it should be based on realizable net worth or income, whichever is greater. If someone is already in debt and has no income then it becomes a time cost (ex; defensive driving class) rather than a financial cost.
Are you being ironic or did you just accidentally stumble upon how progressive taxation works?
one car accident and all those bits that are being inflated/stretched will rupture / tear / pop / asplode. and such a nice person otherwise… /s
At least she wears her airbags.
My gamer, this is the most obvious rage bait I have ever seen. A blind man could see it
It’s really interesting how particularly susceptible millenials are to rage-bait. People just get dragged into it so easily
It’s not an age thing
Agree to disagree, I’ve not got any data to hand to back it up, but historically millenials are generally good at spotting fake content, but fall short particularly with the new era of attention seeking - a lot of which is either nostalgia or rage bait. Gen X are worse all round, and Gen Z seem to be particularly bad for anything comparative.
What does she claim her yearly income? Usually someone working hard enough to brush off a $3k fine doesn’t drive themselves around and is smart enough to know the safety of seatbelts. Something tells me her lifestyle isn’t based on her income.
Rich people aren’t necessarily smart. These are two unrelated metrics. See Elon Musk for a counter example.
I should’ve been less subtle, what is Elon Musk’s salary? Couldn’t find his quickly but Zuckerburg’s is $1 a year and Bezos is $81,000. So how would an income-based fine work for those who can claim a very low yearly income and still live a lavish lifestyle? That’s the loophole that would be used.
I honestly doubt she's particularly rich.
I googled and a private helicopter from NYC to DC costs 10k.
But she shared a helicopter with other people. That can cost as little as 1.5k. It's the budget option.
Sure, that's not nothing, but it's the kind of thing even someone on a relatively average income could save up for.
LOL. Rich people still drive, who do you think buys those expensive sports cars? They don't buy them to get chauffeured around in it. Sure they get chauffeured in their Rolls Royce, but a Bentley or Aston Martin they drive themselves. Also why do you assume wealth is correlated to intelligence? Lot's of dumb people are insanely rich and lots of smart people are poor.
What is that thing?
Looks like incel propaganda.
No, incels do actually spend a good bit of time creating fake women to be mad at. Hell this lady makes me mad.
Many reactionary ideologies bolster themselves by lying about their targets, so it’s reasonable to ask: “Why am I seeing this? What was the goal in posting this? What is the author’s underlying claim?”
Everyone should be asking these questions about any picture they see online.
no shirt ._.
What is wrong with her face? Is that intentional or was this poor woman born that way?
Surgery, lots and lots of surgery.
She was probably born as a deranged idiot, yes.
“Sir, do you have any idea how fast your neurons were firing?”
“No officer, I was distracted.”
I see the Andromedans stopped wearing their disguises. Time to spit out the bubblegum.
I think it depends… on safety issues like seat belts and stuff, yes 10% of yearly income is acceptable. However, if I’m 1 week out from renewing my registration? Screw that, its the government just wanting more money from me owning my car. Its not going to kill someone if my truck has been registered under my name before and i forget to get it reupped that week. I’m not advocating forever mind you, just give some leniency on bureaucratic crap that won’t affect safety of anyone.
Fining people for not wearing a seat belt I dont support. Victimless crime.
I agree that fines are not an effective deterrent for crime. Very rich people don’t have much income though (elon musk, for example, i think reports $0 income a year, most of there money comes from capital gains or debt against their assets) and poor people have so little income it will probably encourage lawbreaking, which is probably also not desired, so I don’t really support income based fines. It doesn’t seem to accomplish the objective effectively. Perhaps loss of privileges would be more effective, such as losing your license to drive.
Any unbelted person in a collision becomes an uncontrollable projectile. Which means anyone around the vehicle, and more importantly the child IN her vehicle are at risk of being killed by her flying corpse.
Also, she already had her license taken away, and it apparently didn’t stop her driving.
Don’t forget the victims of paramedics and fire fighters that will need to come and sponge you off the highway and live with that trauma for the rest of their lives.
So, so, so wrong.
People get flung through windscreens. People in rear seats get flung into the people in the front, killing both of them.
Have you ever seen the aftermath of a rear seat passenger not wearing a seatbelt, then being flung into the back of the front seat, after an 80mph crash into a sycamore tree?
I have. Neither survived. One of them wasn’t even recognisable.
Plus, emergency services have to deal with this shit. Family, friends, others on the road have to deal with the consequences. Don’t be such a fucking moron.
you’re impressively wrong about everything you typed.
Can someone explain to me why capital gains taxes are lower than income taxes?
Why is “playing the market with your surplus money” charged less than “working your ass off, day in and day out”?
We have no shortage of capital in this country. The financial sector is twice the size of our manufacturing sector. That is ludicrous.
flyoverstate@kbin.social 1 year ago
this is fake ass rage bait crafted to draw eyes to whomever this is
MudMan@kbin.social 1 year ago
Joke's on them, in this place people are much more likely to get excited about the minutia of administrative sanctions than about rageclicking on the boobs lady. Gotta read the room.
douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You may think that but the quality has been dropping quite rapidly and is approaching normal Reddit status.
treadful@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
The more I look at it the more obviously doctored these photos are. But why is it actually kind of convincing? Maybe I’ve gotten dumber.
hOrni@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Probably this. The third image even has some text whipped out and overwritten.