This game really shows how it COULD be. Totally fail with epic bad reviews. No giving up, putting year after year of free updates and content until the initial vision was approximated and reviews went to very positive.
I dunno if I could name another game that managed that in the last 3 decades.
TalkingFlower@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Honestly, I would rather pay for quality than be forced to accept a bad update like this one, at least with paid DLC you know what to avoid. The game is still wide as the ocean, deep as a puddle.
The_Almighty_Walrus@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Complaining about something free and optional is wild
TalkingFlower@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
You tell that to the chill players when people mention “improve combat”, but why do fans complain when it is free, right? It is wild. xD
KiloGex@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
The great thing is that you don’t have to interact with it if you don’t want to. And I’m not sure you can call a game who people have played for over a thousand hours shallow.
TalkingFlower@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Nah, the length of an artwork does not indicate depth, tons of TV shows lasting over 10 seasons and 42 mins per episodes and they are still shallow, still don’t pack a punch like the good old BBC Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy and Alec Guinness plays the role to perfection.
But remember, that’s where they spent their development time, instead of improving the original concept… Oh, wait, they still have the sandbox as the shield to widen the ocean as much as possible.