EncryptKeeper

Hetzner recently skyrocketed the pricing of their VPS offerings.

Linode? You mean Akamai Connected Cloud?

Tell it to your Discord kitten

Yes, back to enjoying your Reddit moderating

No, no moral high ground or grandstanding…just reality

No it’s 100% grandstanding, sorry.

What I’m pointing out is that, at the end of the day, it’s not your lump of clay to mold even if you disagree with the way it’s being molded.

So ultimately you’re adding nothing to the conversation at all. Yes this is the behavior I’m describing lol. VERY reddit behavior.

Hmm seems everyone is living in the same reality is you though, so your comment has no substance or meaning other than some weird self-enlightened moral grandstanding.

Cool, nobody said you did.

Similarly, there’s no binding contract that says when you remove features from your software’s community edition in order to drive more profits without any added value, I’m disallowed from criticizing you for it.

I’m not a big fan of this sort of pseudo-philosophical contrarian fence-sitting.

I mean sure, he’s not technically wrong, but it also implies that while Developers have the freedom to perform these rug-pulls (they do), the author simultaneously wags their finger at the people who have freedom to react the way they have.

Developers (companies) are not entitled to be free from criticism or backlash for acting shitty.

“HugeNerd”

“Ok so that was a fucking lie”

Somebody once told me that Star Trek was just “People walking through doors and talking” and I could never argue that point.

I use Bookorbit not Kabota but this is usually done via OPDS. Kavita is the server and KoReader or a dedicated plugin on the kibo is the client.

How would it, or any software for that matter determine a given request is malicious before it does something malicious?

Try nostalgicpod.com

This is the selfhosted community. Not the Free, Open Source community.

I think you can infer the rules from the name here. The stuff you post must be related to software you can host on your own hardware. It need not be free, nor open source.

Now your point about spam from brand new accounts that are literally just ads on the other hand is valid.

Soviet Union TLD is an interesting choice lol

It is a skill much like maintaining a car yourself, or your own lawn/garden.

It’s pretty easy to get started, and there are certain ways of doing things that keep it pretty simple forever, at the cost of some flexibility.

But no matter how you do it, there will be a non-zero amount of work involved indefinitely. Just like you need your cars oil changed, your garden mulched and weeded, or your server patched and cleaned up once in awhile.

This was the peak of human civilization.

That’s why I switched to Emby and only sometimes regret it lol.

Jellyfin can’t even do smart collections of TV and movies

Since Nextcloud stores your actually data on the disk, it doesn’t actually matter all that much tbh

Yeah it definitely does not work in this case. Spent many hours online looking through threads of people with the same problems, but no real solution. I think it has something to do with Unraids MFS implementation. Might be a little older. Only way to get it to work is have a script run every 10 minutes to check for the drive and if it’s not mounted, mount it. Works well enough.

Im using UnRAID for storage and getting another Linux machine to mount a share in boot has been an exercise in futility so I get it.

Because this is the selfhosted community, not the FOSS community. That being said, yeah don’t use Plex.

You don’t need a VPN to trick Plex. Exposing the web ui to the world will likely show traffic coming from your router, which is internal.

This is not the case at all. That’s not how routing, nor port forwarding works. This will work on Jellyfin, but if you do it on Plex without paying, this will be blocked. You are still fundamentally misunderstanding how literally all of this works. And it’s getting to the point where I’m wondering if you’re actually this confidently ignorant, or if you’re just a troll, given the only comments on your account are pro-Plex and anti-Jellyfin.

Jellyfin is also very limiting based on your users devices. There is no Jellyfin app for Samsung TVs (without sideloading) or Playstation. Users there are shit out of luck.

Users there would be shit out of luck with Plex too, because neither of those platforms support Tailscale or any other VPN. More clients support Jellyfin than VPN apps, so if you’re not paying for Plex, then Jellyfin is less limiting than Plex.

The thing you’re failing to grasp is that Jellyfin is not nearly as simple as you’re making it out to be.

What you’ve failed to grasp is that Jellyfin is exactly as simple as I’ve made it out to be. You can forward a port, give your client an address to pop in, and remote streaming will work flawlessly, for free. You cannot do that same process with Plex for free. Only if you pay for it.

You’re saying two completely different incompatible things. In your last comment you said “You can just forward a port”. You can’t “just forward a port” or do any of the other things you suggested with Plex for free. Period.

The second thing you’re saying is using a VPN to trick Plex into thinking you’re local. You may be able to do that, but that’s entirely different from “just forwarding a port” or using a reverse proxy, or any of the other normal, easy ways to remotely stream over Jellyfin. It’s not only more work than sharing Jellyfin, but it’s also very limiting based on your users devices. For example, many people are streaming Plex, Emby, Jellyfin on RokuTVs. RokuTVs have an app for Jellyfin that can just connect directly, but it does not have a Tailscale client. So if you want to trick Plex into thinking they’re local, you’d now have to pay money to get them a new device, and then you’d have the configure the VPN on it, and troubleshoot that when it breaks. A lot of people are going to just opt for Jellyfin which is much easier and doesn’t require buying new hardware.

You can if you don’t pay.

No, you can’t.

The only thing they’re blocking is traffic through their servers. If you expose the port to your local instance, they have no control over it.

Once again, this is wrong. They are blocking traffic to your server even if you don’t go through theirs, unless you pay.

You cannot do what you’re suggesting if you don’t pay.

You can still just forward a port. Just expose the web ui port to the world, the same way Jellyfin does.

You can if you pay. I’m not sure what about this is so difficult for you to understand.

Ok so before when you said:

The work required to expose Jellyfin to the world is the same work to expose Plex.

What you actually meant was the work required to expose Jellyfin to the world is entirely different from the work you have to do to now expose Plex without paying. And the simplest solution of forwarding a port will no longer work for free, and anyone you share it with now also has to connect their device to Tailscale (if they even can on their device) even if they’re non-technical?

Where as with Jellyfin you can remotely stream without having to do ANY of that for free…

Are you starting to understand why this might make people just switch to Jellyfin?

You’ve misunderstood Plex’s announcement.

This change to Plex just charges for the relay servers, you can still do free remote streaming in the same way Jellyfin does.

This is not correct. The change to Plex affects all remote streaming, regardless of whether you’re using the relay or direct streaming.

To be clear,

• You have configured Plex for remote streaming without a relay - You will need to pay for Plex Pass or the Watch Pass
• You have configured Jellyfin for remote streaming the same way as you would with Plex - Free.

You can forward a port in your router like you would with Plex, or you can use a reverse proxy, or Tailscale Funnel if you want to get jazzy wit it.