As evidence, the lawsuit cites unnamed “courageous whistleblowers” who allege that WhatsApp and Meta employees can request to view a user’s messages through a simple process, thus bypassing the app’s end-to-end encryption. “A worker need only send a ‘task’ (i.e., request via Meta’s internal system) to a Meta engineer with an explanation that they need access to WhatsApp messages for their job,” the lawsuit claims. “The Meta engineering team will then grant access – often without any scrutiny at all – and the worker’s workstation will then have a new window or widget available that can pull up any WhatsApp user’s messages based on the user’s User ID number, which is unique to a user but identical across all Meta products.”
“Once the Meta worker has this access, they can read users’ messages by opening the widget; no separate decryption step is required,” the 51-page complaint adds. “The WhatsApp messages appear in widgets commingled with widgets containing messages from unencrypted sources. Messages appear almost as soon as they are communicated – essentially, in real-time. Moreover, access is unlimited in temporal scope, with Meta workers able to access messages from the time users first activated their accounts, including those messages users believe they have deleted.” The lawsuit does not provide any technical details to back up the rather sensational claims.
just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
DUH
sexy_peach@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
No if this is proven it would be a real scandal and would bring a lot of users to better alternatives.
If it’s false that’s good too, since then WA has e2e encryption
MrSoup@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Most users of whatsapp don’t care about e2e. They hardly even know what it is.
just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s already a known risk, because WA uses centralized key management and servers, and always has regardless what Meta says. If you believe their bullshit, then I feel sad for you.
Also…you don’t think that LAWYERS willing to go up against Meta would have rock solid proof from these whistleblowers FIRST before filing a lawsuit?
C’mon now, buddy.
RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
What are the better alternatives, because it seems like the comment section is flooded with people (yourself includes) that don’t understand that most (probably all) e2e messaging apps are vulnerable to this attack as long as they trust a centralized server.
The issue isn’t an encryption one, it’s a trust one that requires you to trust the makers of the messaging app and the servers the apps connect to (and the method by which the app is distributed to you).
zeca@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
People wouldnt move. They know its not secure and they dont care enough.
Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Mark zuckerberg eats scandals for breakfast
sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org 2 weeks ago
we can’t lose!
pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
How would we know?
devfuuu@lemmy.world [bot] 2 weeks ago
It would not. People don’t care. People don’t care that meta is an evil corp. Encryption is not even close to the top 10 reasons people use that app. It’s just a random word normal users throw around because marketing told them it’s good.
Sunspear@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Shocked, I tell you
justanotheruser4@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That’s just another comment