partofthevoice
@partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
- Comment on Evidence That Humans Now Speak in a Chatbot-Influenced Dialect Is Getting Stronger 4 days ago:
Is “a nap” related at all to “a napkin?”
- Comment on Google's Agentic AI wipes user's entire HDD without permission in catastrophic failure 1 week ago:
An unstable desktop environment reintroduces market for anti-virus, backup, and restore. Particularly, with users who don’t understand this stuff and are more likely to shell out cash for it.
- Comment on The Algorithm That Detected a $610 Billion Fraud: How Machine Intelligence Exposed the AI Industry’s Circular Financing Scheme 1 week ago:
There will be fallout, for sure, as soon as they finish calculating what percentage of profit should be fined away.
- Comment on Leak confirms OpenAI is preparing ads on ChatGPT for public roll out 1 week ago:
You’re welcome to hold whatever abstract position you like, but the claim that context I’ve raised is “meaningless” misses the point. Meaning isn’t inherent in the universe—it’s created by observers—so dismissing context as meaningless is simply incoherent. Context is meaning.
I’m not here to debate metaphysics. I’m here to discuss the economic implications of current events: (1) China’s push to build a gold-backed, highly liquid, transferable settlement asset, (2) Russia’s claim that the U.S. may pursue similar moves that could undercut the dollar, (3) gold doubling per USD in the last two years and the long historical context that introduces, and (4) the everything bubble we’re in right now. The question is what these signals imply for the future, not whether signals “mean nothing.”
If you believe they point to a different outcome, offer a substantive alternative. Otherwise, insisting that everything is meaningless adds nothing to the discussion; it only reveals the limitations of your perspective, which I’m uninterested in. That, limited, world view is the safe “fantasy land” here…
- Comment on Leak confirms OpenAI is preparing ads on ChatGPT for public roll out 1 week ago:
In my fantasy world? Alright friend, you can take whatever high level position you want and forever repeat your incorrect points. As a matter of fact, however, there is no essence to meaning in the universe. Meaning is derived from the observer. So your point about the validation of meaning is fruitless: no such thing as a meaningless piece of context, unless you are so narrow minded in your fantasy land as to believe in such limitations. I would encourage the interested reader, not those of whom are only interested in preserving their shallow ideological pool, to consider for a moment that the world is far more complex than is immediately obvious.
As for you, on the other hand, I fail to understand why you’ve tethered my curiosity to the dispute of whether meaning is pervasive to all things—or not. Meaning is what you make of it, and you’ve clearly made nothing of it, and I clearly can not help you see beyond such boundaries, so I will (hopefully) end this discussion now. I am not interested in debating my philosophies with you anymore. That’s just not what I came here for.
My goal was to discuss the meaning of various macroeconomic market activities, alongside the (very real) efforts China is taking to develop their own gold-backed liquid, transferable, monetary-grade asset that can serve like a global banking/settlement medium. As well as, Russias claim that, the US is moving toward a similar move which would deface US currency.
This debate is about whether or not the completely valid and present signs actually point to anything. It’s not about the validity of signage. It’s not about whether meaning is inherent or not. Nor is about fantasy land ideology. It’s about economics. If you think the signs mean something other than what they suggest, be my guest and introduce a novel idea. Otherwise, like I said before, I don’t care whether you think the signs may or may not mean nothing.
“Nothing” doesn’t even make sense in this context. It’s akin a statement like “global warming means nothing.” Duh, you make the meaning. If all you can think of is “nothing,” it says more about you than the actual affairs of the world.
- Comment on IBM CEO says there is 'no way' spending trillions on AI data centers will pay off at today's infrastructure costs 1 week ago:
I heard ram pricing is high. There’s their use, an economic one.
- Comment on Leak confirms OpenAI is preparing ads on ChatGPT for public roll out 1 week ago:
Yes, I do see. You’re conflating what has no meaning to you with what has no meaning at all. They aren’t the same thing, though.
- Comment on Leak confirms OpenAI is preparing ads on ChatGPT for public roll out 1 week ago:
You’re confusing what I mean. Of course you can make fictitious meaning out of anything. But all meaning is created. No meaning is discovered. To say there is no meaning, it represents the depth of creativity rather than the depth of reality. Everything has meaning. Whether or not you think the meaning fictitious is another topic altogether.
- Comment on Leak confirms OpenAI is preparing ads on ChatGPT for public roll out 1 week ago:
Only woks until you find yourself in the same debt spiral that royally fucked Rome, Spain, Italy, …
- Comment on Leak confirms OpenAI is preparing ads on ChatGPT for public roll out 1 week ago:
They can be greedy, idiots, and still know how to come out on top of a failing empire. Everything means something because meaning is created, not discovered.
I really think there’s a lot more to this than use the eye.
- Comment on Leak confirms OpenAI is preparing ads on ChatGPT for public roll out 1 week ago:
Anyone else concerned that the AI bubble is actually an everything bubble, and more or less represents the devaluation of the US dollar? We have a lot of debt, we can’t necessarily keep raise interest rates to slow down spending (as that would make the debt’s impact far greater), and so they’re printing money onto the deficit. Meanwhile, you have the White House eye balling cryptocurrency, letting banks hold it alongside gold, … what does all of this mean?
- Comment on A Vibe Coded SaaS Killed My Team 2 weeks ago:
Vibe coding is a self perpetuating feedback loop of hallucinations. The more complex the project gets, the worse the problems. The agent reads its own prior code, which biases it to the prior approach. That bias just pushes issue further, buries them deeper, and you don’t find out until the product is done enough to actually look at it.
I knew a guy who wanted his vibe coding project to display the page count in a PDF. I showed him a super simple python script to do it, but it wasn’t usable for him because his shitty implementation was so unmanageable, so grotesquely over and under engineered at the same time, … he rather spent hours trying and failing to get the AI agent to implement my feature for him.
- Comment on GitHub - DioCrafts/OxiCloud: ☁️ OxiCloud server, efficient and secure way to save all your data 2 weeks ago:
These might be apples and oranges, but how does NextCloud compare to Seafile?
- Comment on OpenAI needs to raise at least $207bn by 2030 so it can continue to lose money, HSBC estimates 2 weeks ago:
I like mailsac. Any user handle and no signup.
- Comment on Rybbit - Open source Google Analytics replacement 2 weeks ago:
I was curious and, yeah, it seems like docker hub not requiring signature means many popular publishers don’t bother to sign. But that’s not to say it can’t be done. For example: github.com/sigstore/cosign
Today,
cosignhas been tested and works against […] Docker Hub - Comment on Rybbit - Open source Google Analytics replacement 2 weeks ago:
Again we’re talking past each other. I’m sure those results are available and I’m aware docker doesn’t verify signatures automatically, but I’m asking how that necessarily makes docker insecure in spite of best practices being implemented. It’s about pinning yourself to trusted digests and having a verification process (like time) before updates. Why would you need authorship verification in that case? If there’s a good answer to that, I’d consider alternatives too. I’m just saying I don’t think it’s inherently insecure over this, and at face value I wouldn’t call docker insecure over this. It boils back down to the classic: don’t download untrusted software.
- Comment on Rybbit - Open source Google Analytics replacement 2 weeks ago:
You’re making big claims on security here, like “cannot be done,” and each time you do I feel like we’re talking past each other a bit. I never claimed you can verify that the person who pushed the container had access to a private key file. I claimed you can verify the security of a container, specifically by auditing it and reviewing the publisher’s online presence. Best practices. Don’t upgrade right away, and pin digests to those which can be trusted.
When you pin a digest, you’re not going to get a container some malicious agent force pushed after the fact. You pinned the download to an immutable digest, so hot-swapping the container is out the window. What, as I understand, you’re concerned with is the scenario that a malicious actor (1) compromised the registry login beforehand, (2) you pinned the digest after hand, and (3) the attack is unnoticed by you and everyone else.
I’m trying to figure out under what conditions this would actually occur, and thus justifies the claim that
docker pullis insecure. In a work setting, I only see this being an issue if the process to test/upgrade existing ones is already an insecure process.Can you help me understand why I should believe that, even with best practices in place, Dockers own insecurities are unacceptable? Docker is used everywhere and I’m reluctant to believe everyone just doesn’t care about an unmanageable attack vector.
- Comment on Rybbit - Open source Google Analytics replacement 2 weeks ago:
You’re talking about authorship. Sure. But if you verify the container yourself as secure and pin the digest, what’s the issue?
- Comment on Rybbit - Open source Google Analytics replacement 2 weeks ago:
What are you talking about, “yeah that’s the insecurity I’m talking about.”
I didn’t mention an insecurity and neither have you. Would you mind being a little more clear than “Docker pull is insecure?”
Frankly, I was expressing confidence in dockers security. It goes without saying though, any user can do insecure things like download from untrusted sources. That’s not dockers problem though, it’s the users.
- Comment on Rybbit - Open source Google Analytics replacement 2 weeks ago:
You can verify the checksum to ensure the contents pulled are exactly the same as what was published. You can also use a private container registry.
- Comment on Rybbit - Open source Google Analytics replacement 3 weeks ago:
Docker is a security risk? … excuse me, what? Can’t you just, idunno, secure the environment that docker runs in? Use rootless images? Use immutable images?
And, are you asking for something that runs on bare metal? Couldn’t you just install the ISO that the dockerfile uses, then convert the dockerfile logic to an sh script?
- Comment on Hyundai car requires $2000, app & internet access to fix your brakes - what the actual f 3 weeks ago:
Yes, that one exactly. Good call out, but let’s be honest. There’s a big difference between Android and the Linux we know and love. It’s not about using the Linux kernel. There is no widespread, polished, supported mobile Linux distribution comparable to iOS or Android in reach (at least nothing functional for use as a phone). GNU/Linux distros on phones would be a warm welcome.
- Comment on Hyundai car requires $2000, app & internet access to fix your brakes - what the actual f 3 weeks ago:
They’re still stuck on Linux for mobile.
- Comment on HP and Dell disable HEVC support built into their laptops’ CPUs 3 weeks ago:
It’s interesting how the tone of innovation changes. It starts out like “hey, I can do that better than my competitors!” and that’s all fine, doing something better creating market demand and cash influx. But eventually, the innovation looks for shortcuts around the its competitive roots… enshitification is the word. Cheaper parts, smaller quantities, subscriptions to hardware you buy but never own… There’s a shift from product/service innovation as means to financial growth to purely financially incentivized innovation.
It reminds me of Marx’s idea that concentration of capital naturally leads to the prominence of financial markets, an indicator of a capitalist economy reaching its “advanced” / crisis-prone phase. The similarity being: there’s an economic shift from industrial investment as means to financial growth to purely financial investment.
- Comment on Microsoft AI CEO pushes back against critics after recent Windows AI backlash — "the fact that people are unimpressed ... is mindblowing to me" 3 weeks ago:
Windows to let side loading third party AI onto their baby, with priority access to a bunch of APIs that might actually make them compete on their own OS? I wish.
- Comment on Microsoft AI CEO pushes back against critics after recent Windows AI backlash — "the fact that people are unimpressed ... is mindblowing to me" 3 weeks ago:
File search is fucking terrible on windows, dear lord.
- Comment on I wonder 3 weeks ago:
but we don’t think over too much longer
Are… are you a seagull?
- Comment on Sam Altman and husband reportedly working to genetically engineer babies from having hereditary disease 3 weeks ago:
If that were the case, wouldn’t the ones who didn’t get the genetic engineering be far more likely to reproduce and stride along with natural selection? I have a hard time seeing that event ever happening, short of the human population en mass deciding to engineer every baby on the planet before a single generation of which could have lived life and been studied for its effects.
- Comment on YSK: A simple trick to keep your bananas ripe for a lot longer. 4 weeks ago:
You need to wipe it in honey first, and cover the honey in cinnamon. Then take a toothpick and push it through the center of that. Then, kid you not, chocolate syrup. Put it in the freezer and it’ll last a millennium.
- Comment on Microsoft confirms Windows 11 is about to change massively, gets enormous backlash - Neowin 4 weeks ago:
PC gamers under 30 would be considered a significant minority compared to other <30yos?