According to a Stack Overflow survey from 2025, 84 percent of developers now use or plan to use AI tools, up from 76 percent a year earlier. This rapid adoption partly explains the decline in forum activity.
As someone who participated in the survey, I’d recommend everyone take anything regarding SO’s recent surveys with a truckfull of salt. The recent surveys have been unbelievable biased with tons of leading questions that force you to answer in specific ways. They’re basically completely worthless in terms of statistics.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 weeks ago
TBH asking questions on SO (and most similar platforms) fucking sucks, no surprise that users jump at the first opportunity at getting answers another way.
slate@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
Removed. Someone else already said this before. Also, please ensure you stick to the stlye guides next time, and be less ambiguous. SO could mean a plethora of things.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 weeks ago
Spoiler
last time this question was answered was for several years older software versions, and the old solutions don’t work anymore
Supervisor194@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
I was in the middle of making a reply like this but yours is better. Closed as duplicate.
thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
I will never forget the time I posted a question about why something wasn’t working as I expected, with a minimal example (≈ 10 lines of python, no external libraries) and a description of the expected behaviour and observed behaviour.
The first three-ish replies I got were instant comments that this in fact does work like I would expect, and that the observed behaviour I described wasn’t what the code would produce. A day later, some highly-rated user made a friendly note that I had a typo that just happened to trigger this very unexpected error.
Basically, I was thrashed by the first replies, when the people replying hadn’t even run the code. It felt extremely good to be able to reply to them that they were asshats for saying that the code didn’t do what I said it did when they hadn’t even run it.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 weeks ago
Damn, lol
Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 5 weeks ago
Yea it sucks, but quality is important so I get it.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 weeks ago
I do understand being rigorous about questions, and technical forums were even worse a lot of the time, but SO’s methods led to the site becoming severely outdated. They really should have introduced a mechanism to mark old content as outdated. It should have been obvious like 10 years ago that solutions often stop working come next major version or the programming language, framework or operating system.