Goldholz
@Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- Comment on Sneaky Austrians 1 week ago:
The AfD isnt looking at them Martin Sellner, the nazi fuck, is litterly behind these whole “remigration” conventions and rethoric
- Comment on So who has Rome beat in total numbers do you think? 1 week ago:
China?
- Comment on Haudenosaunee was quite something 1 week ago:
Didnt see the “in the americas” my bad
- Comment on Haudenosaunee was quite something 1 week ago:
Venice…san marino…free citys
- Comment on Sneaky Austrians 1 week ago:
Even today its austrians building up the nazis and war enthusiasm in germany
- Comment on What do you know Nazis were wrong 1 week ago:
Tacitus, writing about germania while have never left italy
- Comment on Aged very poorly didn't it? 1 week ago:
RIP Kurt Eisner and what would have been perfect absolute democracy in all aspects of life
- Comment on B-but muh based king! 2 weeks ago:
“The glory of the german empire!” You mean the glory of no democracy, militarism that led to blind obedience, millions death, exploitation, poverty and “fuck you, should have been born rich”? Yeah checks out nazis
- Comment on don't @ me 2 weeks ago:
How did you study the bronze age collaps
- Comment on Granted the cartoons were low-effort and stupid but freaking out about it just proved their point 2 weeks ago:
Fanatics are the same everywhere and come in every flavor.
- Comment on Thank you for your attention to this matter. 3 weeks ago:
Yeah! The allies were closing in on germany! So even if it was a german false flag attack (which it obviousely wasnt), they had to attack poland, belgium, luxembourg, denmark, netherlands, norway and yugoslavia to defend against allied agression /j
OBVIOUSELY JOKING FOR THOSE THAT DONT GET IT!!
- Comment on “Peaceful ancient Mediterranean state” is an oxymoron, the difference was a skill issue 3 weeks ago:
Never one war of aggression always defense /j
- Comment on I’m on my last leg, gentlemen 3 weeks ago:
Thats not Sgt. Schulz of Stalag 13, that is Hitlers Personal Guard! All Sergants want to look like him.
- Comment on I’m on my last leg, gentlemen 3 weeks ago:
“I SAID THAT IN MY JOKY VOICE!!” - Hitler to his intern
- Comment on Fym you use leavened bread? 3 weeks ago:
HISTORY/THEOLOGIE IN LESSON!
The first schism of christianity was in 70 CE threw the great temple destruction in jerusalem. That also clearly split christianity from judeism and that btw is also why christians are the only abrahamic religion that allows eating of pork. Resulting into paulician christians, gnostic christians and jewish christians who kept lots of jewish customs. Gnostics belief that the spiritual is all that matters and all material is created by the devil and pure evil. Paulicians heavily emphisise jesus’ earthly presence and being human. Gnostics downplayed it.
Then was the schism at the council of Nicaea in 323 CE was about the essence of spirituality, holy spirit jesus and god all being one essence and co-eternal or 3 seperate entities with only god being eternal. This is the thing you are thinking about.
In 431 at the council of ephesus the roman parts of the faith split from the “nestorians” on the grounds of nestorians putting too much emphisis on the distinction between jesus’ divinity and humanity.
The great split of 451 CE at the council of chalcedon split the “oriental orthodox church” (coptics like in etheopia) was about the nature of jesus. Was jesus one, human and divine (this is oriental orthodox), or one person but had two natures.
But the great schism of 1054 was about politics, spiritual doctrine authority, ritual doctrine, whether the holy spirit was only from god or from jesus and god together and so much more.
- Comment on Fym you use leavened bread? 3 weeks ago:
Though there is not one orthodox church
- Comment on When the Americans achieved what they thought was impossible 3 weeks ago:
“Atomic science is jewish witchcraft!” - Nazis
- Comment on Bro started the Reformation because Heaven had a paywall. 4 weeks ago:
And now is with AI
- Comment on Excellent point... 4 weeks ago:
No we are talking about a world without the essential need to work to survive. But working for the society and not out of neccessaty
- Comment on Excellent point... 4 weeks ago:
You think technological progress only happens when profits are being generated or what is your thing?
- Comment on Excellent point... 4 weeks ago:
…you can code and learn coding by yourself
- Comment on History rabbit hole 4 weeks ago:
Me watching ARTE: constantly awake
- Comment on During the 17th century Europeans constructed cool but unpractical weapons to use as diplomatic gifts. 4 weeks ago:
Ironic to use Neuschwanstein in a meme about middle ages
- Comment on I get it, the Sabaton song was great, but it wasn't that cool 4 weeks ago:
Not just any: the last message it received: “i am a pole” polish sunk the bismark is such a nice thought to rub into
- Comment on Napoleon III and Napoleon I will never get along. 4 weeks ago:
Sometimes i wonder what Napoleon I would have said/wrote about Napoleon III’s reign
- Comment on I did a thing 4 weeks ago:
The answer that you seek is lots and lots of split inheritance. And for swabia lots and lots of city privilages
- Comment on Gold and silver hit records as investors hunt for safety 6 months ago:
Gen Z and Millenials hurdling from one crisis to the next, not having a steady and safe past, present OR future. Now soon an complete economic collaps like the world never saw not even in the 1920s.
History repeats <3 (why did i have to be born in '03)