Clanker-loving cogfuckers. Disgusting. Traitors to the species. But at least they’ll never breed.
Help.
Submitted 3 weeks ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/4e99e872-4231-4da2-8a9b-e8ab6dbd0798.jpeg
Comments
Draegur@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
yknow, its possible to express your frustration without sounding omega racist with a few words swapped
LesserAbe@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I don’t understand the segment of people who were excited to come up with a new slur for AI. Plus it’s not even effective. It doesn’t make sense, doesn’t bite. Computers don’t clank, not even robots clank anymore. Are we in Battlestar Galactica or something
MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
I uh… I took this as humor. Maybe I was wrong.
MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Clanker-loving cogfuckers.
“I’m off to have a clanker-wank.”
sudo_halt@lemmygrad.ml 3 weeks ago
Why do I feel like this is just an excuse for people to dust off their Klan hoods but socially acceptable
Draegur@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Projection, probably.
potato_wallrus@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
lulungomeena_burbclave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
They’re misidentifying that LLM as a tulpa.
We’re aware that some people use LLM output as a basis for the creation of tulpas, but this doesn’t seem to be the case here. This seems to be a person attributing independent intelligence to an LLM external to herself, not recounting her experience with an additional consciousness within her own brain.
Whether or not you consider tulpas or other forms of plurality to be genuine phenomena, this conflates two different concepts which are tangentially related at most.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
it amazes me how there seem to be two takes to the world now:
it’s fine, pfft, don’t overreact. ignore it, it’ll be fine
or
what the actual fuck is that even, we all need to stop and think about what the fuck we’re doing to the models/applications/machines and to the people using them, and what the costs are going to be in making the attempt,for what goal?
and no, the goal can’t be ‘to win / make billions’ because if the output is human insanity and it costs our ecosystem, what’s the fucking point?
witty_username@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
I’m immune, I can’t read
SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You know that by assigning the role of tulpa to their ai they imply that they can summon their companion outside of the chat itself right?
bbb@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Why would anyone choose to know that?
thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 3 weeks ago
I am forced to admit that I knew that.
But my partner of 8 years has DID.
58008@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
If it even partially alleviates loneliness, and if it encourages the person to become more open and confident when communicating with humans, then it’s a great thing.
/cope
~We’re so fucking fucked.~
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
I recently discovered the MyBoyfriendIsAI subreddit and I wish I hadn’t.
There’s a woman who had ChatGPT pick from a bunch of rings online and now she’s “engaged” to it.
I just… I don’t know… we’ve failed people.
devilish666@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 3 weeks ago
I’m not even sure it’s really parasocial. There’s nothing to have a relationship with. This seems like something else, although I don’t know what you’d call it. It’s more akin to getting addicted to a video game.
zbyte64@awful.systems 3 weeks ago
… With whatever corporations is providing the bot. When the business decides to change the model or impose a technical limit that impacts their experience negatively, well you get the idea. There is a material, exploitive capital machine on the other end, and it wants your time.
Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Why do you hate love, fleshborn?
Snowclone@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I’ll stick with parasocial relationship with youtubers and OF accounts, thank you very much!
ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
I agree that this isn’t a social relationship because “not a girl” as Janet says. But I don’t think it’s a parasocial relationship either. It’s much two-way than parasocial is. Maybe more like scoli social if that was a word.
zululove@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Anon, just wait till they put chatGPT in a dildo!
It’s over for men 😒
baronofclubs@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
reddit.com/…/i_built_a_tampermonkey_script_to_bri…
LiveLM@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
You are in love with a subscription service, you are doing exactly that what are you talking abouttttttttttttttt
Jayjader@jlai.lu 2 weeks ago
Will LLMs finally teach humans about consent? (doubt)
zululove@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
Lmfao this is amazing
thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 3 weeks ago
I can make that tomorrow…
mapleseedfall@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
no you cant.
m4xie@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
I’d much rather a vibration motor instead.