I work at a big EU company, MS top partner / strategic account etc. We wanted to implement MS Dynamics CRM in one of our newer business lines, we barely got a reply to our official emails.
After some informal discussions, we were told that salespeople are now only incentivized to sell Copilot, so they don’t really bother with the rest.
If MS is overinvesting to ride the AI hype as a middle man, while letting their core business capabilities (Windows and Office) decline, they will be in trouble in the long term.
EnderMB@lemmy.world 4 months ago
All of big tech is really worried about this.
If the AI boom is a dud, I can see many of these companies reducing their output further. If someone comes along and competes in their primary offering, there’s a real concern that they’ll lose ground in ways that were unthinkable mere years ago. Someone could legitimately challenge Google on search right now, and someone could build a cheap shop that doesn’t sell Chinese tat and uses local suppliers to compete with Amazon. Tech really shat the bed during the last economic downturn.
empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 months ago
or more like their user experience was already so garbage, adding AI to it doesn’t make any noticeable change lol
yrmp@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I don’t use a single Meta product on purpose. I’m sure they scrape my data despite my best efforts to not be tracked online.
I still unfortunately order things from Amazon for the convenience, use Windows for gaming and at work, and occasionally use Google search with heavy boolean search, custom search engines, and browser extensions for filtering out the garbage. I also still use Google Maps and I have an Android based tv where I occasionally watch SmartTube.
Hell I even get Netflix included with my T-Mobile subscription. My wife watches that.
And for now, I have an iPhone SE until it dies and I make the switch to a Google phone or something.
Typing this out makes me wonder what I’m waiting for to find alternatives for this FAANG garbage, but I have no idea how Facebook still exists.
justaderp@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Monopolies don’t care about the user experience, only profit. The AI doesnt understand the former, only the latter. The continued degredation of the user experience is a likely indicator of an increase in revenue as function of successful application of AI.
thurstylark@lemm.ee 4 months ago
Do you possibly mean “The AI evangelists” or something similar?
Like, I could totally understand it in the “software will also include the biases of those who wrote it” kind of way (a la Amazon’s failed attempt at automating job candidate search). If the only incentive you’re given as a programmer is “make it make money”, then yeah, your AI is going to bias towards that end.
Just couldn’t tell on first reading
umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 months ago
its a function of paying their employees less for more work relatively speaking and extracting more profit from consumers through ads and enshitification in general
brianorca@lemmy.world 4 months ago
But that’s also a path for them to no longer be a monopoly, if the right competitor makes the right moves.
normanwall@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I fucking bing’d something the other day to get a better search result. What the fuck google.
Subverb@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Try Kagi. Paid search engines are the future in order to extract yourself from the enshittification of “free” search engines.
greenskye@lemm.ee 4 months ago
I’m not sure there could be any sort of legitimate threat to them, but I could definitely see a Netflix situation playing out. That is a popular upstart temporarily seems poised to take over, but then suffers from extreme levels of interference from bigger players who artificially hold the upstart down while they desperately catch up and then ultimately come at least equal while the Netflix equivalent is mostly a shell of what it could’ve been.
Never underestimate how much buckets and buckets of cash reserves can overcome even incredibly out of touch laziness when it comes to competing with any start ups. Apple in particular could probably afford to let competitors get a decade ahead and still be able to come back based on the ridiculous amount of cash they have to float their business along with.
Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Yeah competition won’t work in a market where some competitors have such massive amounts of wealth. This is a failure of unrestrained capitalism and it’s bad for consumers ultimately.
cm0002@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Not really, unfortunately, because of the sheer mass of the internet the infrastructure to just support the index of it requires massive funding. Even other giants like MS with Bing struggled with this. Short of a radical new way to run a search engine without a massive index, I just don’t see it happening.
greenskye@lemm.ee 4 months ago
It’s kind of curious to me about search because honestly my Internet world has only grown smaller and smaller. Where I used to use Google to find new websites, I feel like most of my searches on Google are now to search a handful of sites I already know. Ironically if Reddit had a better search function, a lot of my Google usage would fall off as I’d just go directly there, as it’s still the best place I’ve found for troubleshooting support and real reviews of lots of products. A competitor to Google wouldn’t really need to index the entire web for most people, but rather a relatively small number of website super giants like Amazon, Reddit, Wikipedia, etc.
Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 4 months ago
Kagi literally provides the same quality Google used to.
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Whaddya mean, “if”?
MataVatnik@lemmy.world 4 months ago
AI did boom, but people don’t realize the peak happened a year ago. Now all we have is latecomers with FOMO. It’s gonna be all incremental gains from here on.
Holzkohlen@feddit.de 4 months ago
And people will still say AI isn’t a bubble.
Womble@lemmy.world 4 months ago
There is a bubble in AI, AI isnt a bubble. In the same way there was a bubble in e-commercebthat lead to the dotcom crash. But that didnt mean there was nothing of value there, just that there wasnyo much money chasing hype.
Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml 4 months ago
I think it will hinge on one thing: Will AI provide an experience that is maybe worse, but still sufficient to keep the market share, at lower cost than putting in the proper effort? If so, it might still become a tragic “success”-story.
MonkderDritte@feddit.de 4 months ago
Summary: stick to open source if you want usability.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 months ago
How does that address web search and online shopping?
rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 4 months ago
No. They are still capable of pressure typical for oligopoly (censoring out mentions of their competition, tactically buying out things which could help that competition and shutting them down, defamation, lobbying for laws directed against their competition).
Unless that happens too fast for them to realize.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 months ago
slag?