At this point manufacturers should just be giving me the vehicle for free.
Automakers Are Sharing Consumers’ Driving Behavior With Insurance Companies
Submitted 8 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
phoneymouse@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I will never buy a GM vehicle. There were others reasons not to, but this seals the deal.
feannag@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Not sure if you’ve seen this, but all cars are bad. It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 8 months ago
If you dont want to be digitally tracked, then you better figure out how a carburetor works and buy only old cars for the rest of your life.
cause every modern car has this shit, if not now, then soon.
FilterItOut@thelemmy.club 8 months ago
I think a carburetor is a bit much. There are plenty of fuel injected machines that were built before insane spying became the new normal.
grue@lemmy.world 8 months ago
There’s about a 20-year window when cars had fuel injection but no tracking. All my cars are from within that window.
cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
My 95 Integra was EFI and didn’t track me.
Socsa@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
I’m sure it’s only a matter of time before someone make a flipper zero plugin to sanitize canbus data.
BakerBagel@midwest.social 8 months ago
Literally EVERY car manufacturer is doing this. Nissan and Kia both explicitly claim access to all data about your sex life they can access. For all we know, they could be reading through your text messages and dating app profiles everytime your phone is connected to the car.
wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 8 months ago
Hate to break it to you, but you’ll essentially need to avoid all new cars. For example, Subaru has been collecting data on people fucking in their cars.
tal@lemmy.today 8 months ago
No, they just said that they reserved the right to obtain and sell data on user sexual activity in the privacy policy. There’s no reason to believe that they’ve actually done that or that it was specifically sexual activity in cars; the same policy could cover, say, driving to a motel for a tryst.
LesserAbe@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Needs legislation! When everybody’s doing it and people need to get around, there should be privacy by law
RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I wonder how selling the car impacts the data stream? If you could show that the automaker and LexisNexis aren’t properly handling the transition of the car’s owner from one to another – effectively penalizing the original owner for the actions of a subsequent owner – there might be a legal angle of attack to assert damages.
50MYT@aussie.zone 8 months ago
Data would surely be username x car modem I’d or something= unique id.
RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 8 months ago
You labor under the impression that they would only track & keep data if the user was logged in.
Who changed the username in the on-board OnStar system? Did you think to perform a full factory reset on the car’s electronic systems, before selling the car? CAN you?
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’m sure insurance is gonna stop caring as soon as they get a notice saying that the person sold the car.
RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’m an IT professional and I am not sure of that at all.
Raiderkev@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’m starting to think I won’t ever buy a new car n keep driving older, dumber cats. My current car is an 08, and anything beyond that seems to have been slowly enshittified.
warmaster@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I thought the same about Smart TV’s. Now there’s no escape. You can only block it’s network traffic.
Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Just wait till they pack in some 5g antennas
silence7@slrpnk.net 8 months ago
That won’t work at scale; cars wear out, and become expensive enough to maintain that people scrap them
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
Just keep 7 or 8 of the same model and fix it yourself. Pretty soon we’ll be able to fabricate every single part on these so even if the parts go out we will be able to keep them running
Moneo@lemmy.world 8 months ago
‘Cars = Freedom Crew’, where ya at?
silence7@slrpnk.net 8 months ago
Working to make the car payment, instead of zipping around on a paid-off bicycle
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
Plug every antenna port with a 50ohm dummy load There, got freedom of travel back
SecretSauces@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I wonder if there’s a way to disable that kind of reporting. Obviously, that’s not an acceptable answer to the issue. Sharing of information like that needs to be opt-in with full disclosure and not buried within pages of legalese.
But as a moderately tech savvy person, maybe there’s a way to disable it’s network connectivity so it can’t phone home anymore.
slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 8 months ago
Rip out the antenna.
0x0@programming.dev 8 months ago
For now, i assume “all” you have to to is find the car’s antennas and disable them. Once “no signal” == “car won’t start”, you’ll have to spoof the antenna signal. I’ll keep my '98 car for as long as i can thanks very much.
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 8 months ago
In my Subaru it’s a seperate box under the radio. It intercepts the front speakers and microphone from the radio, so with a custom harness I can bypass it. Obviously that varies by make, model, and trim.
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Unless its fiber optic you could probably just cut and splice.
vvv@programming.dev 8 months ago
on my car, there’s a fuse you can pull out, which theoretically cuts power to OnStar. check your car manual/forums about your model
pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 8 months ago
There is with my vehicle. In fact, such tracking was opt-in if you enabled the driving score feature.
I’d imagine this is mostly a case of someone not reading their ToS before enabling the car’s smart features.
ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Welp, time to disable OnStar…
silence7@slrpnk.net 8 months ago
A lot of car makers use a cellular connection collect this data. You need to disable that too.
ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
I agree it should be codified, but have no hope that our fascist leaning lawmakers won’t gladly accept $$ from insurance companies and automakers to do what they want to do anyways.
Magister@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Yep, all cars connected so you can pay $20/month for remote start and things like this. The only way to disable cellular connection in the car is to unplug the cell antenna from the module. You have to dig the information online to find where is the module and have to disassemble the dash to do so maybe? But it’s te only way. Even if you don’t pay, the connection will still work and manufacturer receives all info.
BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
This is one of the reasons I never want a car with it’s own internet connection. I’ll stick to plugging in my phone, where I’m very stingy with which apps even get location data, much less the “physical activity history” permission which allows this kind of continuous tracking (and which is usually needed because it uses Google’s algorithms / possibly neural nets to guess whether you’re driving or walking based on accelerometer / gyro / gps / magnetometer sensor fusion).
FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 8 months ago
The location tracking on my phone is in no way precise enough to determine this info.
BirdEnjoyer@kbin.social 8 months ago
This seems like such a wretched inevitably. I mean, I guess we're living it with phones, but it seems so unnecessary with cars.
Is there really no market for the same boring car, with minor efficiency tweaks, for, like, ever? I coulda lived with my 95' Accord forever if the parts hadn't been too expensive.
Do es the market really not want that, or do the manufacturers prevent it from happening?
Any Automancer please explain, I'm not car enough to understand.
silence7@slrpnk.net 8 months ago
Selling your data is a new revenue stream for automakers, and as a practical matter, you can’t avoid it.
BirdEnjoyer@kbin.social 8 months ago
Even before data sales, though, a baseline, universal car never happened. Was there never a market or was a market never allowed to form?
Or perhaps the tech in a car really does advance faster than I understand?
0x0@programming.dev 8 months ago
Do es the market really not want that, or do the manufacturers prevent it from happening?
Of course they don’t want that. Build-int obsolescence is a thing, has been for ages and not just in cars.
Redwastaken@lemmynsfw.com 8 months ago
My next question would be, does the Asian models have this same shit ?
If not importing would be a nice alternative
FilterItOut@thelemmy.club 8 months ago
I mean, as someone else pointed out in a comment here, they literally have it in the terms that they can track your sexual activity…
Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Ban the Chinese version of LexisNexis! If it works for social media it will work for the insurance industry!
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] 8 months ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:
LexisNexis is a New York-based global data broker with a “Risk Solutions” division that caters to the auto insurance industry and has traditionally kept tabs on car accidents and tickets.
But “drivers are historically reluctant to participate in these programs,” as Ford Motor put it in a patent application that describes what is happening instead: Car companies are collecting information directly from internet-connected vehicles for use by the insurance industry.
In recent years, automakers, including G.M., Honda, Kia and Hyundai, have started offering optional features in their connected-car apps that rate people’s driving.
In a recent promotional campaign, an Instagram influencer used Smart Driver in a competition with her husband to find out who could collect the most digital badges, such as “brake genius” and “limit hero.”
Neither the car companies nor the data brokers deny that they are engaged in this practice, though automakers say the main purpose of their driver feedback programs is to help people develop safer driving habits.
The other automakers all have optional driver-coaching features in their apps — Kia, Mitsubishi and Hyundai have “Driving Score,” while Honda and Acura have “Driver Feedback” — that, when turned on, collect information about people’s mileage, speed, braking and acceleration that is then shared with LexisNexis or Verisk, the companies said in response to questions from The New York Times.
The original article contains 2,347 words, the summary contains 222 words. Saved 91%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Akasazh@feddit.nl 8 months ago
I wonder if google does this with maps data
pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 8 months ago
Do you really have to wonder if a free Google service is collecting your data?
Akasazh@feddit.nl 8 months ago
Well it shouldn’t as I am an EU citizen. However I’m quite certain they should seek out to do so. I only mention it as someone should look into it, like the author of this article…
Moneo@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Fuck Google but they don’t not sell your data with your name attached to it.
antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
I guess iOS needs to add privacy permissions about accelerometer. I wouldn’t have thought but there’s a perfect use case: Google Maps would like access to your accelerometer.
Blaster_M@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Disconnects modem from out of warranty car
What now, automakers?
hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 8 months ago
your car is bricked
Blaster_M@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Must be real fun having to explain to customers that their car stops working because they drove too fae away from the nearst cell tower.
anon6789@lemmy.world 8 months ago
This summary contains 489 words. I’m neither a bot nor open source, but the bot summary was poo.
mesamunefire@lemmy.world 8 months ago
A company that I worked for partnered/ worked with LN. They are legit. Some of the smartest people I know. They are a very old data warehouse (among many other things) company.
If you would like the same report done: consumer.risk.lexisnexis.com/consumer They make it very easy.
anon6789@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Is there anything you can do once you get the report?
This is the kinda thing that I’d probably be happier not knowing if there’s nothing I can do about it.
Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 8 months ago
It accounts for speeding… How? Cross reference location with local speed limits? Record times above an internally set speed?
bus_factor@lemmy.world 8 months ago
New Hondas with front cameras (used for adaptive cruise control and lane departure warnings) will read speed limit signs to display them in the dashboard.
It only parses the number, so if a US car is in Canada it will say the speed limit is 110 mph on the highway. If these GM cars do the same they’d probably think any Canadian car going for a weekend trip to the US did so at prison-worthy speeds.
anon6789@lemmy.world 8 months ago
It mentioned logging speeds above 80 mph.
That’s the highest speed limit I can find for the US, so if you’re 80+, it seems you are breaking the law regardless of location.
XeroxCool@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Based on the text of the article (speeding above 80mph)and my experience with an insurance app, it’s simply looking for anything over 80mph from calculated GPS speed. It doesn’t care about 75 in a 25, just that you don’t break the highest possible speed limit
XeroxCool@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I used an app version of driving tracking. It gave me an OK discount of around 5-10% just for participation but I didn’t like the fear of tripping it’s alarms - over 80mph and hard braking. Sure, 80mph should be easy enough to handle, but the packs of cars on my commute at the time would cause some interesting events where I’d slowly get up to 75 and still get passed. Come up on someone doing 70 and it’s easy to tip into the 80s to make a pass in a faster lane. But the real concern, for me, is that it made me brake softer. I genuinely got concerned I’d rear end someone to not upset the app. I was worried it’d be a subconscious thing that causes a hiccup in my response, making a bad situation worse. Why would I take the penalty for someone who cut me off?
Now, I think I’m a great driver. Lots of experience early on at a dealership, lots of small quick practice sessions for pushing limits to learn and stay honed, re-learning about attentiveness on a motorcycle, and so on. But I don’t trust the rest of the people out here on a good day, let alone worrying about their brake nanny. And I get it, hard braking to save yourself (not just being inattentive or aggressive) is still an indicator of crash liklihood, but fuck that.
anon6789@lemmy.world 8 months ago
This matches what my girlfriend’s experience seemed to be, a weirdness about trying to please the device that has no real awareness of the situation. Second guessing yourself in an emergency isn’t the best outcome.
gt24@lemmy.world 8 months ago
What happens if your specific vehicle has a sensor somewhat out of spec that keeps errantly triggering harsh braking? You wouldn’t know the sensor is activating, you wouldn’t know that the information is being fed to your insurance, and you wouldn’t know why your insurance is priced as it is. You have no transparency as to what is going on nor any realistic way of fixing the issue (because the vehicle runs fine after all and nobody can define what “harsh braking” even is).
Such a hypothetical situation is unlikely but even several dozen or hundred examples is a bit too much…
Also, since you are never directly informed that you are harshly braking or accelerating, you are unlikely to improve how you drive to avoid those things. If you had a notification that the braking action was a bit too harsh then you could strive to avoid that in the future… not so much if you are never told that in the first place.
Gork@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Also, what if you need to hard brake or hard accelerate in order to prevent a crash? There’s no way for them to determine that was the case.