Comment

Comment on Automakers Are Sharing Consumers’ Driving Behavior With Insurance Companies

Well it shouldn’t as I am an EU citizen. However I’m quite certain they should seek out to do so. I only mention it as someone should look into it, like the author of this article…

source

Sort:hotnew top

fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
What about being an EU citizens prevents from from collecting any data on you? They’re still able to collect a lot of data.

source
- Akasazh@feddit.nl ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  They should confirm to gdpr rules. Ofc they can collect data, but they certainly can’t sell that personalized info to my car insurer, fi.
  
  source
  - fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    pro.bloomberglaw.com/…/privacy-laws-us-vs-eu-gdpr…
    
    GDPR is opt out, so you wouldn’t get any benefit until you complain. Plus:
    
    (GDPR) excludes “pseudonymised” data
    
    source
    Akasazh@feddit.nl ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    
    GDPR is opt out, so you wouldn’t get any benefit until you complain. Plus:
    
    Not really I must consent to an unambigious statement before data may be processed.
    
    gdpr.eu/gdpr-consent-requirements/
    
    (GDPR) excludes “pseudonymised” data
    
    Thats a bit too broad of a statement:
    
    Anonymization and pseudonymization are still considered as “data processing” under the GDPR—therefore, companies must still comply with Article 5(1)(b)’s “purpose limitation” before attempting either data minimization technique.
    
    While truly “anonymized” data does not, by definition, fall within the scope of the GDPR, complying with the definition is so rigorous that a data controller should be extremely cautious before attempting to use anonymization as a way to circumvent the GDPR completely.
    
    Source: morganlewis.com/…/the-edata-guide-to-gdpr-anonymi…
    
    source