PlayStation is erasing 1,318 seasons of Discovery shows from customer libraries | The change comes as Warner Bros. tries to add subscribers to Max, Discovery+ apps.::The change comes as Warner Bros. tries to add subscribers to Max, Discovery+ apps.
Fuck this shit.
If buying isn’t owning. Piracy isn’t stealing.
This is so anti consumer, I’m surprised the EU hasn’t stepped in to stop it yet
RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world 11 months ago
So they’re taking shows away from people who have already purchased them and moving the shows to other services in order to try to make potential customers subscribe to more services?
Fuck those guys, especially for ripping off people who already paid for the content.
Here we go again. Instead of being forced to subscribe to shitty bundles of cable channels in order to get the channel you do want, we’re being forced to subscribe to multiple shitty services to get the shows we want.
This industry is a one-trick pony. Literally giving the worst service they can to force people to subscribe to more services.
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Oh no, here I go pirating again!
pastaPersona@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Welp time to start mass-buying dvd box sets and ripping the files, screw not owning shit you paid for
CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 11 months ago
Don’t even waste your time and just go directly to the high seas. You’ll get all the same quality content several orders of magnitude faster.
AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world 11 months ago
They didn’t pay for the shows. They paid for access to the shows. That’s all anyone gets these days.
ultra@feddit.ro 11 months ago
meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
Agreed. Streaming services always seemed like gilded cages to me. You can only see what they allow you to see - piracy or old-school Netflix DVD delivery gives you all the options. The promise of being able to stream any content at any time, with the producers and people involved being able to get compensated fairly and justly, just isn’t reality with these ghouls running the show.
The model (in the current form, of artificially restricted licensing) seems like less a way to curate a media catalog, but more like a way to curate the subscribers and culture.
kaitco@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Netflix cancelled their DVD service in September. In an entirely unrelated move, I have recently cancelled my Netflix service…
brygphilomena@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Kind of.
You don’t have yearly contracts and it’s a lot easier to start and stop a particular service at any time.
It’s weird to see this take when I remember streaming started out that this was what was heralded. You could pick and choose what streaming services you wanted and you could change them easily. You didn’t have to buy the sport package or pay the built in royalties of sports teams if you didn’t watch sports.
RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world 11 months ago
For now. However, I’m going to pick at something you mentioned about switching when you want - sure, but most services offer a discount for a year’s subscription. I don’t think it’s an insignificant amount of people that might buy in on that. Switching becomes irrelevant when the service already has your money.
Also, services are separating popular shows, unbundling for lack of a better word, to other platforms to force people to subscribe to more services. Effectively that’s making you pay for shows you don’t want (like your sports reference) to get the shows you do.