Holy crap, people have been reposting takes on this interview for like three days and you can track the degradation of the actual content via the game of telephone in the headlines.
It's kinda depressing.
FWIW, having read the original interview everybody is reheating, the 18000 waters was a random example the Taco Bell exec WSJ interviewed used to explain that part of the issue is that people feel less guilty about messing with automated orders than when they're talking to a human. They are also not backing out from automated orders, which is why the headline is using "rethink".
The core of the issue is correct, though, the guy does spend a significant amount of time giving corpolese synonims of "it's a mess". "We've certainly learned a lot" has to be my favourite.
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
That’s what I want from a drive through. To be surprised or let down.
Dashi@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I mean to be fair… that’s the current drive through experience anyway isn’t it?
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Depends on the restaurant.
There’s one McDonald’s nearby that’s wrong like 80% of the time, but A&W is right almost always for me.
UnculturedSwine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
I can count on a human understanding that I didn’t in fact order 18,000 waters. After this AI f up, it takes a human to fix it. It will be this way until AGI happens if it happens at all.
deegeese@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
That would be funny coming from a customer, but from their CTO it does not inspire confidence.
Mac@mander.xyz 2 weeks ago
Luckily with widespread use of AI we can implement that everywhere!
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
A positive surprise is good though