Funny, when Europe does this, it’s called “socialism”.
U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector
Submitted 8 hours ago by cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/22/intel-goverment-equity-stake.html
Comments
SpontaneousCombustion@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
assembly@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Can you imagine the screams of, “COMMUNISM!!!” If Obama or Biden had done this. It’s all we would hear about for an entire election cycle. Fox “News” would play it nonstop.
anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 7 hours ago
Didn’t Obama do it for GM and a bunch of other companies as part of a bailout package for a period of time?
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 hours ago
Yes and no. In this context, it’s more of a shakedown-sorta thing.
woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
And when China and Arab states do it, it’s something to aspire.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Yes but contrary to China, USA doesn’t use government subsidies to promote their own industries, or state owned companies to spy on the rest of the world. 🤪
I hope Intel survives because a Chinese (mainland+Taiwan) monopoly will not be good, but I am so sick of American disinformation regarding China.
MdRuckus@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Seems like the government owning private industry might stray into the socialism thing thy hate. Why not do this with something more important like healthcare? Republicans are hypocrites.
blattrules@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
It’s only socialism when democrats do it.
devdoggy@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Or the rental market…
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Because healthcare would help you
seralth@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Healthcare could help, that’s good socialism. Intel is profits and power and control for the sake of it. That’s bad socialism.
That way when things fuck up they can point and go SEE SEE IT DOESNT WORK! WE TRIED IT AND IT MADE THINGS WORSE!!
and if it somehow does manage to help or improve things they can now claim they did something smart and take all the credit.
iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Yeah, but then poor people would use it.
Seleni@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
If you ask, they’ll tell you it’s different for ‘essential services’. It’s the same excuse they use for the farm handouts.
seaQueue@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Uhhh, so much for the free market Republicans spent decades championing
ronigami@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
They’ll run it into the ground regardless.
seaQueue@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Well, yeah, they always do. Republican admins always leave the economy in the shitter and saddle the nation up with debt so that the incoming Democratic admin has to spend all of their time bringing the economy back up to speed rather than implementing effective reform.
shalafi@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Didn’t the US do a similar thing to save our auto industry? Buying in? I’m hazy on the details, been a minute, but didn’t we cash out and profit?
Not saying this is the end game here, but still?
witten@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
According to a May 2011 report by the White House National Economic Council, however, the US government may have to write off about $14 billion of its $80 billion loan.
deathbird@mander.xyz 1 hour ago
Cool, now do Duke Energy. And Exelon. And Entergy. Etc. (Not that I trust this admin ofc, but if you want collective ownership…)
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 hours ago
So uh, Intel doesn’t get anything, and gives up 10% of their stock because they’ve just decided to retroactively alter the CHIPs act?
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 3 hours ago
No, not at all. The government bought shares in Intel. When you have shares in a company you own part of the company.
JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Just to clarify and add to what you said, equity shares are not stocks. The gov gets dividends and such, but it isn’t stock that is bought and sold on wall street. It’s all about profitability and not about speculation. If the company makes money, so does the gov. If it loses money, the gov loses money.
MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Fascism is a far-right, ultranationalist, and authoritarian political ideology that emerged in early 20th-century Europe, characterized by a totalitarian, one-party state, a charismatic leader, a fixation on national decline, and the suppression of individual rights and opposition groups. It combines elements of militarism, economic self-sufficiency, and mass mobilization, often through propaganda and violence, to achieve a vision of national purity and power.
MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Release the Trump/Epstein files
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
If tax payers are going to be investing into these businesses and they’re avoiding taxes taking a share of the company is better than nothing.
I mean, it’s socialism, but don’t tell their voters
deathbird@mander.xyz 1 hour ago
🤫
natecox@programming.dev 7 hours ago
And so the current Intel chipset I have will be the last I ever own.
TheRealKuni@piefed.social 5 hours ago
I feel like that should’ve already been a given when the 13th and 14th gen Core processors permanently kneecap themselves if they feel like it. But that’s just me.
Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Me too.
motor_spirit@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
small penis government 😤
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 hours ago
AyyyyyyyyMD
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 hours ago
us taking a stake in a failing company sums up america
blindbunny@lemmy.ml 2 hours ago
Remember we bailed out Harley Davidson. Twice.
BromSwolligans@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Wasn’t government cross-pollinating with industry a relevant component in 20th century definitions of fascism?
balder1991@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Next healthcare?
Grimy@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
I personally don’t think any of these big companies should be privately owned. Rare win for the pedo admin. Maybe we can get 10% of the epstein files next.
TommySoda@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Imagine bribing politicians to get tax breaks as those same politicians start to take more of a cut than the other side would have taxed you. I’m starting to think everyone that is rich and powerful are also incredibly stupid.
kalkulat@lemmy.world 31 minutes ago
Wow. Throw 16M people off health care, then invest the savings in corporations. HEy, Intel, how do you like your blood money?